Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated Family Assessment and Intervention Model: A Collaborative Approach to Support Multi-Challenged Families

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we describe the Integrated Family Assessment and Intervention Model (IFAIM), a multi-systemic, collaborative, strength-based, and family-focused in-home approach developed and implemented in Portugal. IFAIM is designed to assess and to support multi-challenged poor families, commonly known as multi-problem families, at psychosocial risk, with maltreated or neglected children. It integrates clinical, educational, social, community and forensic concerns, and practices under a systemic, narrative, and collaborative umbrella. IFAIM’s theoretical foundations and background, its main characteristics, stages of implementation, and research directions are described and a case illustration is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, T. (1993). See and hear, and be seen and heard. In S. Friedman (Ed.), The new language of change. Constructive collaboration in psychotherapy (pp. 303–322). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. McNamee & K. Gergen (Eds.), Social construction and the therapeutic process (pp. 25–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditti, J., Burton, L., & Neeves-Botelho, S. (2010). Maternal distress and parenting in the context of cumulative disadvantage. Family Process, 49(2), 142–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, C., & Wagner, D. (2000). The relative validity of actuarial and consensus-based risk assessment systems. Children and Youth Services Review, 22(11/12), 839–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R., Greeson, J. K. P., Guo, S., Green, R. L., Hurley, S., & Sisson, J. (2007). Changes in family functioning and child behavior following intensive in-home therapy. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 988–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benard, B. (2006). Using strengths-based practice to tap the resilience of families. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), Strengths perspective in social work practice (4th ed., pp. 197–220). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, I. K., & Kelly, S. (2000). Building solutions in child protective services. New York: Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Dean, S. (2002). Assessment as an intervention in the child and family forensic setting. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(3), 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunk, M., Hengeller, S. W., & Whelan, J. P. (1987). Comparison of multisystemic therapy and parent training in the brief treatment of child abuse and neglect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 171–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brymer, L. K., & Phillips, J. M. (2006). Contextual meanings in action: Integration of social work and family therapy in child protective services. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 25(2), 12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, K. S., Poindexter, L. M., Felix, E. D., & Naik-Polan, A. T. (2001). Clinical assessment of parents in child protection cases: An empirical analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 25(1), 93–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cancrini, L., De Gregorio, F., & Nocerino, S. (1997). Las famílias multiproblemáticas. In M. Coletti & J. L. Linares (Eds.), Las famílias multiproblemáticas [The multiproblem families] (pp. 45–82). Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. (2006). Family therapy. Concepts, process and practice (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirillo, S., & Di Blasio, P. (1992). Families that abuse. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comissão Nacional de Protecção de Crianças e Jovens em Risco [CNPCJR, National Comission for the Protection of At-risk Children, Youth]. (2009). Relatório anual de avaliação das actividades das comissões de protecção de crianças e jovens [Annual reporto of evaluation of the acticities of the comissions for protection of children and youth]. Lisboa: Comissão Nacional de Protecção de Crianças e Jovens em Risco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, J. (2000). Family treatment with child maltreatment using family preservation approaches. In J. Corcoran (Ed.), Evidence-based social work practice with families: A lifespan approach (pp. 76–123). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, P. B., & Henggeler, S. W. (1999). Engaging multiproblem families in treatment: Lessons learned throughout the development of multisystemic therapy. Family Process, 38, 265–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Czyszczon, G., & Lynch, M. (2010). Families in crisis: Resilience-based interventions and in-home family therapy. Retrieved from http://counselingoutfitters.com/vistas/vistas10/Article_17.pdf.

  • Dallos, R., & Urry, A. (1999). Abandoning our parents and grandparents: Does social construction mean the end of systemic therapy? Journal of Family Therapy, 21(2), 161–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2000). Framework for the assessment of children in need and their families. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J., & Beaton, J. M. (2000). Family therapists, community, and civic renewal. Family Process, 39(2), 149–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elkaïm, M. (1985). From general laws to singularities. Family Process, 24, 151–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, G. (1995). Assessing treatability. In P. Reder & C. Lucey (Eds.), Assessment of parenting. Psychiatric and psychological contributions (pp. 102–117). Hove: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, H., & Frankel, S. (2007). Family therapy, family practice, and child and family poverty: Historical perspectives and recent developments. Journal of Family Social Work, 10(4), 43–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, M. E., & McElwain, A. D. (2008). Marriage and family therapy with low-income clients: Professional, ethical and clinical issues. Contemporary Family Therapy, 30, 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., & Smith, L. A. (1992). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: An effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 953–961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogue, A., Liddle, H. A., Becker, D., & Johnson-Leckrone, J. (2002). Family-based prevention counseling for high-risk young adolescents: Immediate outcomes. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, M. F. (1998). Introduction. In M. F. Hoyt (Ed.), The handbook of constructive therapies: Innovative approaches from leading practitioners (pp. 1–26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. Y., Greene, G. J., Hsu, K., Solovey, A., Grove, D., Fraser, J. S., et al. (2009). Utilizing family strengths and resilience: Integrative family and systems treatment with children and adolescents with severe emotional and behavioral problems. Family Process, 48(3), 395–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, H. (2004). Family-based therapies for adolescent alcohol and drug use: Research contributions and future research needs. Addiction, 99(2), 76–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, G. (2001). Effective interventions for child abuse and neglect. An evidence-based approach to planning and evaluating interventions. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, W. C. (2007). Collaborative therapy with multi-stressed families (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo, A. T., & Alarcão, M. (2010). From multi-problem to multi-challenged families: A Multiple Challenges Integrative Model. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Melo, A. T., & Alarcão, M. (2011a). Training professionals in community settings: Change processes and outcomes in a child protection context. Manuscript submitted to publication.

  • Melo, A. T., & Alarcão, M. (2011b). Implementation of a community-based family-centered program in Portugal: A multiple case study evaluation. Manuscript submitted to publication.

  • Munro, E. (2008). Effective child protection (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzoli, M. S., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing, circularity, neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, P., & Lucey, C. (Eds.). (1995). Assessment of parenting. Psychiatric and psychological contributions. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relvas, A. P. (1996). A co-construção da hipótese sistémica em terapia familiar [The co-construction of systemic hypothesis in family therapy]. Análise Psicológica, 4(XIV), 563–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, P. (2008). Amplifying deviations in family interactions: Guidelines for trainees in post-milan family therapy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 29(1), 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojano, R. (2004). The practice of community family therapy. Family Process, 43(1), 59–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saleebey, D. (2002). The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessions, P., & Lightburn, A. (2006). What is community-based clinical practice? Traditions and transformations. In A. Lightburn & P. Sessions (Eds.), Handbook of community-based clinical practice (pp. 3–18). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharlin, S. A., & Shamai, M. (2000). Therapeutic intervention with poor, unorganized families. From distress to hope. New York: The Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluzki, C. E. (1992). Transformations: A blueprint for narrative changes in therapy. Family Process, 31(3), 217–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, L., & Eusébio, C. (2005). When multi-problem poor individual’s values meet practitioners’ values. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15(5), 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, L., Ribeiro, C., & Rodrigues, S. (2007). Are practitioners incorporating a strengths-focused approach when working with multi-problem poor families? Journal of Community Applied Social Psychology, 17, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D. H., Davis, S. D., & Lebow, J. L. (2009). Common factors in couple and family therapy. The overlooked foundation for effective practice. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, T. (2002). Collaborative “expertise”: After the discursive turn. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 12(2), 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomm, K. (1987). Interventive interviewing: Part II. Reflexive questioning as a means to enable self-healing. Family Process, 26(2), 167–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, A. (Coord.) (2008). Estudo de diagnóstico e de avaliação das comissões de protecção de crianças e jovens [Diagnostic and evaluation study of the comissions of protection of children and youth]. Lisboa: Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia, Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa.

  • Turnell, A., & Edwards, S. (1999). Signs of safety. A solution and safety oriented approach to child protection casework. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetere, A., & Dallos, R. (2003). Working systemically with families. Formulation, intervention and evaluation. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, F. (2006a). Strengthening family resilience (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, T. (2006b). Two sides of the same coin: Ambiguity and complexity in child protection work. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 25(2), 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (2007). Maps of narrative practice. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present work was supported by a doctoral scholarship (SFRH/BD/39912/2007) attributed to the first author by the Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Teixeira de Melo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teixeira de Melo, A., Alarcão, M. Integrated Family Assessment and Intervention Model: A Collaborative Approach to Support Multi-Challenged Families. Contemp Fam Ther 33, 400–416 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-011-9168-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-011-9168-0

Keywords

Navigation