Top

Gepubliceerd in:

22-11-2021 | Original Article

Profiles of Parents’ Preferences for Delivery Formats and Program Features of Parenting Interventions

Auteurs: Carolina Gonzalez, Alina Morawska, Divna M. Haslam

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development | Uitgave 3/2023

Abstract

Parents are the targeted consumers of parenting interventions but a small body of research has examined parental preferences for program characteristics to incorporate them in the adaptation and implementation of such programs. Furthermore, the relationship between parents’ preferences for program characteristics and their cognitions and behaviours has not yet been explored. This study aimed to identify profiles of parental preferences for delivery formats and program features of parenting interventions. Data from 6949 participants from the International Parenting Survey was analysed. Two-step cluster analyses were conducted to determine clusters of delivery formats and program features of parenting interventions. Preferences for delivery formats showed two clusters, a face-to-face cluster and a media-based cluster. In terms of program features, two clusters were also obtained, a personalised cluster and logistic cluster. While these clusters differed in some demographics, parents’ report of child emotional and behavioural problems and parent factors were the key differentiating variables.

vorige artikel Global Workforce Development in Father Engagement Competencies for Family-Based Interventions Using an Online Training Program: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study

volgende artikel After Experiencing a Tornado: Adolescents’ Longitudinal Trajectories in Posttraumatic Growth and Their Association with Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms

World Health Organization (2009) Preventing violence through the development of safe, stable and nurturing relationships between children and their parents and caregivers. World Health Organization, Geneva

Lundahl B, Risser HJ, Lovejoy MC (2006) A meta-analysis of parent training: moderators and follow-up effects. Clin Psychol Rev 26(1):86–104PubMedCrossRef

Metzler CW et al (2012) Using consumer preference information to increase the reach and impact of media-based parenting interventions in a public health approach to parenting support. Behav Ther 43(2):257–270PubMedCrossRef

Chacko A et al (2016) Engagement in behavioral parent training: review of the literature and implications for practice. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 19(3):204–215PubMedCrossRef

Spoth R et al (2007) Toward dissemination of evidence-based family interventions: maintenance of community-based partnership recruitment results and associated factors. J Fam Psychol 21(2):137–146PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Baker CN, Arnold DH, Meagher S (2011) Enrollment and attendance in a parent training prevention program for conduct problems. Prev Sci 12(2):126–138PubMedCrossRef

Sanders MR, Kirby JN (2012) Consumer engagement and the development, evaluation, and dissemination of evidence-based parenting programs. Behav Ther 43(2):236–250PubMedCrossRef

Chacko A et al (2008) A pilot study of the feasibility and efficacy of the Strategies to Enhance Positive Parenting (STEPP) Program for single mothers of children with ADHD. J Atten Disord 12(3):270–280PubMedCrossRef

Niec LN et al (2014) Working together to solve disparities: Latina/o parents’ contributions to the adaptation of a preventive intervention for childhood conduct problems. Psychol Serv 11(4):410–420PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

10.

Jago R et al (2013) Process evaluation of the Teamplay parenting intervention pilot: implications for recruitment, retention and course refinement. BMC Public Health 13(1):1–12CrossRef

11.

Haslam D, Patrick P, Kirby J (2015) Giving voice to working mothers: a consumer informed study to program design for working mothers. J Child Fam Stud 24(8):2463–2473CrossRef

12.

He Y et al (2016) A randomized preference trial to inform personalization of a parent training program implemented in community mental health clinics. Pract Policy Res 6(1):73–80

13.

He Y et al (2018) Do parent preferences for child conduct problem interventions impact parenting outcomes? A pilot study in community children’s mental health settings. J Marital Fam Ther 44(4):716–729PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

14.

Aalborg AE et al (2010) Implementation of adolescent family-based substance use prevention programmes in health care settings: comparisons across conditions and programmes. Health Educ J 71(1):53–61PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

15.

Bannon WM, McKay MM (2005) Are barriers to service and parental preference match for service related to urban child mental health service use? Families Soc 86(1):30–35CrossRef

16.

Iacoviello BM et al (2007) Treatment preferences affect the therapeutic alliance: implications for randomized controlled trials. J Consult Clin Psychol 75(1):194–198PubMedCrossRef

17.

Kwan BM, Dimidjian S, Rizvi SL (2010) Treatment preference, engagement, and clinical improvement in pharmacotherapy versus psychotherapy for depression. Behav Res Ther 48(8):799–804PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

18.

Petra M, Kohl P (2010) Pathways triple P and the child welfare system: a promising fit. Child Youth Serv Rev 32(4):611–618PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

19.

Chacko A et al (2012) Evaluating a comprehensive strategy to improve engagement to group-based behavioral parent training for high-risk families of children with ADHD. J Abnorm Child Psychol 40(8):1351–1362PubMedCrossRef

20.

Gonzalez M et al (2019) The impact of the triple P seminar series on Canadian parents’ use of physical punishment, non-physical punishment and non-punitive responses. Behav Chang 36(2):102–120CrossRef

21.

Lefever JB et al (2013) Prediction of early engagement and completion of a home visitation parenting intervention for preventing child maltreatment. NHSA Dialog 16:1

22.

Haslam D, Sanders M, Sofronoff K (2013) Reducing work and family conflict in teachers: a randomised controlled trial of workplace triple P. Sch Ment Heal 5(2):70–82CrossRef

23.

Fossum S et al (2018) Parental and child factors associated with participation in a randomised control trial of an Internet-assisted parent training programme. Child Adolesc Mental Health 23(2):71–77CrossRef

24.

Lee CM et al (2014) The International Parenting Survey–Canada: exploring access to parenting services. Can Psychol 55(2):110–116CrossRef

25.

Matsumoto Y, Sofronoff K, Sanders MR (2009) Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in triple P-positive parenting program. J Child Fam Stud 18(3):274–283CrossRef

26.

Sanders MR et al (2011) Designing effective interventions for working parents: a web-based survey of parents in the UK workforce. J Children’s Serv 6(3):186–200CrossRef

27.

Fabiano G, Schatz N, Jerome S (2016) Parental preferences for early intervention programming examined using best–worst scaling methodology. Child Youth Care Forum 45(5):655–673CrossRef

28.

Mytton J et al (2014) Facilitators and barriers to engagement in parenting programs: a qualitative systematic review. Health Educ Behav 41(2):127–137PubMedCrossRef

29.

Koerting J et al (2013) Barriers to, and facilitators of, parenting programmes for childhood behaviour problems: a qualitative synthesis of studies of parents’ and professionals’ perceptions. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 22:11CrossRef

30.

Sheeran P, Webb TL (2016) The intention–behavior gap. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 10(9):503–518CrossRef

31.

Bloomquist M et al (2009) Understanding parent participation in a going-to-scale implementation trial of the Early Risers conduct problems prevention program. J Child Fam Stud 18(6):710–718CrossRef

32.

Johnston C, Park JL, Miller NV (2018) Parental cognitions: relations to parenting and child behavior. In: Sanders MR, Morawska A (eds) Handbook of parenting and child development across the lifespan. Springer, Cham, pp 395–414CrossRef

33.

Knerr W, Gardner F, Cluver L (2013) Improving positive parenting skills and reducing harsh and abusive parenting in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Prev Sci 14(4):352–363PubMedCrossRef

34.

Johnston C, Mah JWT, Regambal M (2010) Parenting cognitions and treatment beliefs as predictors of experience using behavioral parenting strategies in families of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behav Ther 41(4):491–504PubMedCrossRef

35.

Duppong-Hurley K et al (2014) Assessing parenting skills and attitudes: a review of the psychometrics of parenting measures. J Child Fam Stud 23(5):812–823CrossRef

36.

Nordstrom AH, Dumas JE, Gitter AH (2008) Parental attributions and perceived intervention benefits and obstacles as predictors of maternal engagement in a preventive parenting program. NHSA Dialog 11(1):1–24CrossRef

37.

Sanders MR et al (2014) Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS): Validation of a brief parent-report measure for use in assessment of parenting skills and family relationships. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 45(3):255–272PubMedCrossRef

38.

Sanders MR et al (2014) The triple P-positive parenting program: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clin Psychol Rev 34(4):337–357PubMedCrossRef

39.

Miller BA et al (2012) Parent and child characteristics related to chosen adolescent alcohol and drug prevention program. Health Educ Res 27(1):1–13PubMedCrossRef

40.

Cunningham C et al (2008) Modeling the information preferences of parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint experiment. J Abnorm Child Psychol 36(7):1123–1138PubMedCrossRef

41.

Wymbs FA et al (2016) Examining parents’ preferences for group and individual parent training for children with ADHD symptoms. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 45(5):614–631PubMedCrossRef

42.

Morawska A et al (2017) The International Parenting Survey: rationale, development, and potential applications. Comprehens Child Adolesc Nursing 2017:1–14

43.

Gonzalez C, Morawska A, Haslam DM (2021) A model of intention to participate in parenting interventions: the role of parent cognitions and behaviours. Behav Ther 52(3):761–773PubMedCrossRef

44.

Morawska A, Sanders MR (2010) Family Background Questionnaire. Parenting and Family Support Centre, Brisbane

45.

Farruggia S (2009) Parenting Belief Questionnaire. Unpublished manual. University of Auckland, Auckland

46.

Morawska A et al (2014) Child adjustment and parent efficacy scale: development and initial validation of a parent report measure. Aust Psychol 49(4):241–252CrossRef

47.

Kessler RC et al (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 32:959–976PubMedCrossRef

48.

Hair JF et al (2014) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson, Harlow

49.

Clatworthy J et al (2005) The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review. Br J Health Psychol 10(3):329–358PubMedCrossRef

50.

Beasley TM, Schumacker RE (1995) Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: post hoc and planned comparison procedures. J Exp Educ 64(1):79–93CrossRef

51.

García-Pérez MA, Núñez-Antón V (2003) Cellwise residual analysis in two-way contingency tables. Educ Psychol Measur 63(5):825–839CrossRef

52.

Bennett DA (2001) How can I deal with missing data in my study? Aust N Z J Public Health 25(5):464–469PubMedCrossRef

53.

Garvey C et al (2006) Measuring participation in a prevention trial with parents of young children. Res Nurs Health 29(3):212–222PubMedCrossRef

54.

Gorman-Smith D et al (2002) Predictors of participation in a family-focused preventive intervention for substance use. Psychol Addict Behav 16(14):S55–S64PubMedCrossRef

55.

Love SM et al (2016) Social media and gamification: engaging vulnerable parents in an online evidence-based parenting program. Child Abuse Negl 53:95–107PubMedCrossRef

56.

Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112(1):155–159PubMedCrossRef

57.

Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York

Titel: Profiles of Parents’ Preferences for Delivery Formats and Program Features of Parenting Interventions
Auteurs: Carolina Gonzalez
Alina Morawska
Divna M. Haslam
Publicatiedatum: 22-11-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development / Uitgave 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-021-01284-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2023

Policies are Needed to Increase the Reach and Impact of Evidence-Based Parenting Supports: A Call for a Population-Based Approach to Supporting Parents, Children, and Families

Examining the Mental Health Presentations of Treatment-Seeking Transgender and Gender Nonconforming (TGNC) Youth

The Use of Rumination and Reappraisal in Adolescents Daily Life: Links to Affect and Emotion Regulation Style

Treatment Implications of Sleep-Related Problems in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Global Workforce Development in Father Engagement Competencies for Family-Based Interventions Using an Online Training Program: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study

Bedtime Routines of Young Children, Parenting Stress, and Bedtime Resistance: Mediation Models