Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development 3/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

Is Cyberbullying Related to Trait or State Anger?

Auteurs: Antonia Lonigro, Barry H. Schneider, Fiorenzo Laghi, Roberto Baiocco, Susanna Pallini, Thomas Brunner

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development | Uitgave 3/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Anger is a powerful emotion shared by victims and bullies in both physical and electronic forms of bullying. However, little is known about the specific roles of trait anger and state anger in involvement in bullying episodes. The purpose of this study was to verify which component of anger, trait or state, is more strongly related to physical and cyberbullying and victimization. Students between the ages 11–19 (N = 716, 392 female, 324 male) completed the state trait anger expression inventory-2 child and adolescent and a measure of victimization and bullying. Results for cyberbullying suggested a major vulnerability among bullies and victims to experience anger as a personality trait as well some links between state anger, cyberbullying and cybervictimization. Moreover, the outward, explosive expression of anger appears to be common among cyber and physical bullies. Implications for intervention programs are discussed.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Mishna F (2012) Bullying: a guide to research, intervention, and prevention. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef Mishna F (2012) Bullying: a guide to research, intervention, and prevention. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hinduja S, Patchin JW (2012) Cyberbullying: neither an epidemic nor a rarity. Eur J Dev Psychol 9:539–543CrossRef Hinduja S, Patchin JW (2012) Cyberbullying: neither an epidemic nor a rarity. Eur J Dev Psychol 9:539–543CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tokunaga RS (2010) Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Hum Behav 26:277–287CrossRef Tokunaga RS (2010) Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Hum Behav 26:277–287CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kowalski RM, Morgan CA, Limber SP (2012) Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying. Sch Psychol Intern 33:505–519CrossRef Kowalski RM, Morgan CA, Limber SP (2012) Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying. Sch Psychol Intern 33:505–519CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jackson M, Cassidy W, Brown K (2009) Out of the mouth of babes: students’ voice their opinions on cyber-bullying. Long Island Educ Rev 8:24–30 Jackson M, Cassidy W, Brown K (2009) Out of the mouth of babes: students’ voice their opinions on cyber-bullying. Long Island Educ Rev 8:24–30
6.
go back to reference Dooley JJ, Pyzalski J, Cross D (2009) Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: a theoretical and conceptual review. J Psych 217:182–188 Dooley JJ, Pyzalski J, Cross D (2009) Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: a theoretical and conceptual review. J Psych 217:182–188
7.
go back to reference Laftman SB, Modin B, Östberg V (2012) Cyberbullying and subjective health: a large-scale study of students in Stockholm, Sweden. Child Youth Serv Rev 35:112–119CrossRef Laftman SB, Modin B, Östberg V (2012) Cyberbullying and subjective health: a large-scale study of students in Stockholm, Sweden. Child Youth Serv Rev 35:112–119CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Campbell MA, Slee PT, Spears B, Butler D, Kift S (2013) Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. Sch Psychol Int 34:613–629CrossRef Campbell MA, Slee PT, Spears B, Butler D, Kift S (2013) Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. Sch Psychol Int 34:613–629CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Campbell MA, Cross D, Spears B, Slee P (2010) Cyberbullying-legal implications for schools. Occasional paper 118. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education Campbell MA, Cross D, Spears B, Slee P (2010) Cyberbullying-legal implications for schools. Occasional paper 118. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education
10.
go back to reference Cassidy W, Faucher C, Jackson M (2013) Cyberbullying among youth: a comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. Sch Psychol Int 34:575–612CrossRef Cassidy W, Faucher C, Jackson M (2013) Cyberbullying among youth: a comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. Sch Psychol Int 34:575–612CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mishna F, Khoury-Kassabri M, Gadalla T, Daciuk J (2012) Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: victims, bullies, and bully–victims. Child Youth Serv Rev 34:63–70CrossRef Mishna F, Khoury-Kassabri M, Gadalla T, Daciuk J (2012) Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: victims, bullies, and bully–victims. Child Youth Serv Rev 34:63–70CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Agatston P, Kowalski R, Limber S (2012) Youth views on cyberbullying. In: Patchin JW, Hinduja S (eds) Cyberbullying prevention and response: expert perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp 57–71 Agatston P, Kowalski R, Limber S (2012) Youth views on cyberbullying. In: Patchin JW, Hinduja S (eds) Cyberbullying prevention and response: expert perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp 57–71
13.
go back to reference Marczak M, Coyne I (2010) Cyberbullying at school: good practice and legal aspects in the United Kingdom. Aust J Guid Couns 20:182–193CrossRef Marczak M, Coyne I (2010) Cyberbullying at school: good practice and legal aspects in the United Kingdom. Aust J Guid Couns 20:182–193CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Patchin JW, Hinduja S (2012) Cyberbullying: an update and synthesis of the research. In: Patchin JW, Hinduja S (eds) Cyberbullying prevention and response: expert perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp 13–35 Patchin JW, Hinduja S (2012) Cyberbullying: an update and synthesis of the research. In: Patchin JW, Hinduja S (eds) Cyberbullying prevention and response: expert perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp 13–35
15.
go back to reference Topcu C, Erdur-Baker O (2012) Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. Sch Psychol Int 33:550–561CrossRef Topcu C, Erdur-Baker O (2012) Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. Sch Psychol Int 33:550–561CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ortega R, Elipe P, Mora-Merchán JA, Genta ML, Brighi A, Guarini A, Tippett N (2012) The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims: a European cross-national study. Aggress Behav 38:342–356CrossRefPubMed Ortega R, Elipe P, Mora-Merchán JA, Genta ML, Brighi A, Guarini A, Tippett N (2012) The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims: a European cross-national study. Aggress Behav 38:342–356CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Izard CE (1971) The face of emotion. Appleton-Century-Crofts, East Norwalk Izard CE (1971) The face of emotion. Appleton-Century-Crofts, East Norwalk
18.
go back to reference Tomkins SS (1991) Affect imagery consciousness: Vol. III. The negative affects: Anger and fear. Springer, New York Tomkins SS (1991) Affect imagery consciousness: Vol. III. The negative affects: Anger and fear. Springer, New York
19.
20.
go back to reference Izard CE (1993) Four system for emotion activation: cognitive and noncognitive processes. Psychol Rev 68:90–100 Izard CE (1993) Four system for emotion activation: cognitive and noncognitive processes. Psychol Rev 68:90–100
21.
go back to reference Champion KL, Clay DL (2007) Individual differences in responses to provocation and frequent victimization by peers. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 37:205–220CrossRefPubMed Champion KL, Clay DL (2007) Individual differences in responses to provocation and frequent victimization by peers. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 37:205–220CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Candelaria AM, Fedewa AL, Ahn S (2012) The effects of anger management on children’s social and emotional outcomes: a meta-analysis. Sch Psychol Int 33:596–614CrossRef Candelaria AM, Fedewa AL, Ahn S (2012) The effects of anger management on children’s social and emotional outcomes: a meta-analysis. Sch Psychol Int 33:596–614CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Champion KM (2009) Victimization, anger, and gender: low anger and passive responses work. Am J Ortop 79:71–82CrossRef Champion KM (2009) Victimization, anger, and gender: low anger and passive responses work. Am J Ortop 79:71–82CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lovegrove PJ, Henry KL, Slater MD (2012) Examination of the predictors of latent class typologies of bullying involvement among middle school students. J Sch Violence 11:75–93CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Lovegrove PJ, Henry KL, Slater MD (2012) Examination of the predictors of latent class typologies of bullying involvement among middle school students. J Sch Violence 11:75–93CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
25.
go back to reference Spielberger CD, Reheiser EC, Sydeman SJ (1995) Measuring the experience, expression and control of anger. Compr Pediatr Nurs 18:207–232CrossRef Spielberger CD, Reheiser EC, Sydeman SJ (1995) Measuring the experience, expression and control of anger. Compr Pediatr Nurs 18:207–232CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Deffenbacher JL, Oetting ER, Thwaites GA, Lynch RS, Baker DA, Stark RS, Thacker S, Eiswerth-Cox L (1996) State-trait anger theory and the utility of the Trait anger Scale. J Couns Psychol 43:131–148CrossRef Deffenbacher JL, Oetting ER, Thwaites GA, Lynch RS, Baker DA, Stark RS, Thacker S, Eiswerth-Cox L (1996) State-trait anger theory and the utility of the Trait anger Scale. J Couns Psychol 43:131–148CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cassidy W, Jackson M, Brown K (2009) Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me? Students’ experiences with cyber-bullying. Sch Psychol Int 30:383–402CrossRef Cassidy W, Jackson M, Brown K (2009) Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me? Students’ experiences with cyber-bullying. Sch Psychol Int 30:383–402CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russel S, Tippett N (2008) Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 49:376–384CrossRef Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russel S, Tippett N (2008) Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 49:376–384CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Brunner TM, Spielberger CD (1979) State-trait anger expression inventory-2 child and adolescent (STAXI-2 C/A). PAR, Lutz Brunner TM, Spielberger CD (1979) State-trait anger expression inventory-2 child and adolescent (STAXI-2 C/A). PAR, Lutz
30.
go back to reference Besevegis E, Dalla M, Gari A, Karademas CE (2008) The adaptation of state-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI-II) in the Greek language. Psychology 15:171–188 Besevegis E, Dalla M, Gari A, Karademas CE (2008) The adaptation of state-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI-II) in the Greek language. Psychology 15:171–188
31.
go back to reference Culhane SE, Morera OF (2010) Reliability and validity of the Novaco Anger Scale and provocation inventory (NAS-PI) and state-trait anger expression inventory-2 (STAXI-2) in Hispanic and non-hispanic white student samples. Hisp J Behav Sci 32:586–606CrossRef Culhane SE, Morera OF (2010) Reliability and validity of the Novaco Anger Scale and provocation inventory (NAS-PI) and state-trait anger expression inventory-2 (STAXI-2) in Hispanic and non-hispanic white student samples. Hisp J Behav Sci 32:586–606CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mendoza O, Pozo H, Bello C (2010) Validation of the Mexican version of the State-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI-2). Acta Colom Psicologia 13:107–117 Mendoza O, Pozo H, Bello C (2010) Validation of the Mexican version of the State-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI-2). Acta Colom Psicologia 13:107–117
33.
go back to reference Deschênes SS, Dugas MJ, Fracalanza K, Koerner N (2012) The role of anger in generalized anxiety disorder. Cogn Behav Ther 41:261–271CrossRefPubMed Deschênes SS, Dugas MJ, Fracalanza K, Koerner N (2012) The role of anger in generalized anxiety disorder. Cogn Behav Ther 41:261–271CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Sukhodolsky DG, Golub A, Cromwell EN (2001) Development and validation of the Anger Scale rumination. Pers Individ Differ 31:689–800CrossRef Sukhodolsky DG, Golub A, Cromwell EN (2001) Development and validation of the Anger Scale rumination. Pers Individ Differ 31:689–800CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Camodeca M, Goossens FA (2005) Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 46:186–197CrossRef Camodeca M, Goossens FA (2005) Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 46:186–197CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Gansle K (2005) The effectiveness of school-based anger interventions and programs: a meta-analysis. J Sch Psychol 43:321–341CrossRef Gansle K (2005) The effectiveness of school-based anger interventions and programs: a meta-analysis. J Sch Psychol 43:321–341CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sutton J, Smith PK, Swettwnham JS (1999) Bullying and theory of mind: a critique of the “Social Skills Deficit” view of antisocial behavior. Soc Dev 8:117–127CrossRef Sutton J, Smith PK, Swettwnham JS (1999) Bullying and theory of mind: a critique of the “Social Skills Deficit” view of antisocial behavior. Soc Dev 8:117–127CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Garner PW, Hinton HT (2010) Emotional display rules and emotion self-regulation: association with bullying and victimization in community-based after school programs. J Community Appl Soc 20:480–496CrossRef Garner PW, Hinton HT (2010) Emotional display rules and emotion self-regulation: association with bullying and victimization in community-based after school programs. J Community Appl Soc 20:480–496CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Nishina A, Juvonen J, Witkow M (2005) Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will make me feel sick: the psychosocial, somatic, and scholastic consequences of peer harassment. J Clin Child Adoles Psychol Psychiatr 34:37–48CrossRef Nishina A, Juvonen J, Witkow M (2005) Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will make me feel sick: the psychosocial, somatic, and scholastic consequences of peer harassment. J Clin Child Adoles Psychol Psychiatr 34:37–48CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Poulin F, Boivin M (2000) Reactive and proactive aggression: evidence for two–factor model. Psychol Assess 12:115–122CrossRefPubMed Poulin F, Boivin M (2000) Reactive and proactive aggression: evidence for two–factor model. Psychol Assess 12:115–122CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Salmivalli C, Nieminen E (2002) Proactive and reactive aggression in bullies, victims, and bully–victims. Aggress Behav 28:30–44CrossRef Salmivalli C, Nieminen E (2002) Proactive and reactive aggression in bullies, victims, and bully–victims. Aggress Behav 28:30–44CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Knight GP, Guthrie IK, Page MC, Fabes RA (2002) Emotional arousal and gender differences in aggression: a meta-analysis. Aggress Behav 28:366–393CrossRef Knight GP, Guthrie IK, Page MC, Fabes RA (2002) Emotional arousal and gender differences in aggression: a meta-analysis. Aggress Behav 28:366–393CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Amichai-Hamburger Y (2013) Youth internet and wellbeing. Comput Hum Behav 29:1–2CrossRef Amichai-Hamburger Y (2013) Youth internet and wellbeing. Comput Hum Behav 29:1–2CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. Horizon 9:1–6 Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. Horizon 9:1–6
46.
go back to reference Pozzoli T, Ang RP, Gini G (2012) Bystanders’ reactions to bullying: a cross-cultural analysis of personal correlates among Italian and Singaporean students. Soc Dev 21:86–703CrossRef Pozzoli T, Ang RP, Gini G (2012) Bystanders’ reactions to bullying: a cross-cultural analysis of personal correlates among Italian and Singaporean students. Soc Dev 21:86–703CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Farrington DP, Ttofi MM (2009) How to reduce school bullying. Vict Off 4:321–326CrossRef Farrington DP, Ttofi MM (2009) How to reduce school bullying. Vict Off 4:321–326CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Smith JD, Schneider BH, Smith PK, Ananiadou K (2004) The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: a synthesis of evaluation research. Sch Psychol Rev 33:547–560 Smith JD, Schneider BH, Smith PK, Ananiadou K (2004) The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: a synthesis of evaluation research. Sch Psychol Rev 33:547–560
49.
go back to reference Sahin M (2012) An investigation into the efficiency of empathy training program on preventing bullying in primary schools. Child Youth Serv Rev 34:1325–1330CrossRef Sahin M (2012) An investigation into the efficiency of empathy training program on preventing bullying in primary schools. Child Youth Serv Rev 34:1325–1330CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Laghi F, Pallini S, D’Alessio M, Baiocco R (2011) Development and validation of the efficacious self-presentation Scale. J Gen Psychol 172:209–219CrossRef Laghi F, Pallini S, D’Alessio M, Baiocco R (2011) Development and validation of the efficacious self-presentation Scale. J Gen Psychol 172:209–219CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Is Cyberbullying Related to Trait or State Anger?
Auteurs
Antonia Lonigro
Barry H. Schneider
Fiorenzo Laghi
Roberto Baiocco
Susanna Pallini
Thomas Brunner
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development / Uitgave 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-014-0484-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2015

Child Psychiatry & Human Development 3/2015 Naar de uitgave