Skip to main content
Log in

Bidirectional Relations Between Subjective Well-Being in School and Prosocial Behavior Among Elementary School-Aged Children: A Longitudinal Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child & Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The development of prosocial behavior is a significant aspect of children’s social well-being. From the perspective of positive psychology, subjective well-being (SWB) in school is likely a particularly relevant construct in elementary school-aged children’s prosocial development. Research on the relation between SWB in school and prosocial behavior among elementary school-aged children is limited and the relation remains to be clarified using more stringent, longer-term longitudinal methodology and analyses.

Objective

Our primary goal was to examine the longitudinal relations between SWB in school and prosocial behavior among elementary school-aged children in a longitudinal framework.

Method

A total of 634 Chinese elementary school-aged children (baseline Mage = 9.01) participated on three measurement occasions across 2 years at 12-month intervals. Data on children’s SWB in school and prosocial behavior was collected from participants’ self-reports. Longitudinal measurement invariance was tested for the scales. A series of three-wave autoregressive cross-lagged models were used to examine whether SWB in school predicted prosocial behavior or vice versa, and whether the pattern of relations between them was stable over time.

Results

Results revealed positive, bidirectional relations between SWB in school and prosocial behavior among elementary school-aged children, after controlling for gender, grade level, and parental education levels. This pattern of relations was stable over time.

Conclusions

The relation between SWB in school and prosocial behavior is positive and bidirectional among elementary school-aged children. These results suggest the importance of comprehensive social-emotional interventions in promoting the positive development of elementary school-aged children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afolabi, O. A. (2014). Psychosocial predictors of prosocial behavior among a sample of Nigerian undergraduates. European Scientific Journal,10, 241–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akin, A., Cetin, R., & Ozen, Y. (2017). The validity and reliability of Turkish version of the brief adolescents’ subjective well-being in school scale. Journal of European Education,6, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.18656/jee.15093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., et al. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,104, 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies,13, 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1985). Nicomachean ethics (T. Irwin, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work written ca. 350 B.C.).

  • Backman, Y. (2016). Circles of happiness: Students’ perceptions of bidirectional crossovers of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies,17, 1547–1563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9658-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. Y., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science,17, 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01705.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research,17, 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189017003004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputi, M., Lecce, S., Pagnin, A., & Banerjee, R. (2012). Longitudinal effects of theory of mind on later peer relations: The role of prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology,48, 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: Are reconceptualization and proposed new model. Journal of Management,25, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling,9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, T. (2015). Harmony and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,26, 1110–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.934882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y., & Chun, J. S. (2015). Workplace stress and job satisfaction among child protective service workers in South Korea: Focusing on the buffering effects of protective factors. Children and Youth Services Review,57, 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., Rogelberg, S. G., & Pitts, V. E. (2009). Workplace helping: Interactive effects of personality and momentary positive affect. Human Performance,22, 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280903120279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, M. W., Higgins-D’Alessandro, A., & Brown, P. M. (2013). The case for adding prosocial education to current education policy: Preparing students for the tests of life, not just a life of tests. Kedi Journal of Educational Policy,10, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, O. S., Rowland, L. A., Van Lissa, C. J., Zlotowitz, S., McAlaney, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2018). Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,76, 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry,11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNeve, J.-E., Diener, E., Tay, L., & Xuereb, C. (2013). The objective benefits of subjective well-being. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report 2013 (Vol. 2, pp. 54–79). New York: UN Sustainable Network Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research,31, 103–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Heintzelman, S. J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L. D., et al. (2017). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology,58, 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology (pp. 63–73). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behavior,2, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A. (1986). A social information processing model of social competence in children. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 18). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial Development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 646–718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In M. Lamb & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Socioemotional processes (7th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 610–656). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellett, A. J. (2009). Intentions to remain employed in child welfare: The role of human caring, self-efficacy beliefs, and professional organizational culture. Children and Youth Services Review,31, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elovainio, M., Pietikäinen, M., Luopa, P., Kivimäki, M., Ferrie, J. E., Jokela, J., et al. (2011). Organizational justice at school and its associations with pupils’ psychosocial school environment, health, and wellbeing. Social Science and Medicine,73, 1675–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz, A. (2012). A model for subjective well-being in adolescence: Need satisfaction and reasons for living. Social Indicators Research,107, 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9863-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, L. (2009). Development of primary school upper grade students’ prosocial behaviors questionnaire in Inner Mongolia and the relation with their self-esteem. Master’s thesis, Zhejiang Normal University, Zhejiang, China.

  • Ferguson, Y. L., Kasser, T., & Jahng, S. (2011). Differences in life satisfaction and school satisfaction among adolescents from three nations: The role of perceived autonomy support. Journal of Research on Adolescence,21, 649–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00698.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P., Dunn, E., & Granland, S. (2008). Are you being served…? An unobtrusive experiment of affective influences on helping in a department store. European Journal of Social Psychology,38, 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, R., Huebner, E. S., Tian, L., Park, N., O’Byrne, J., Schiff, M., et al. (2008). Cross-national adolescent multidimensional life satisfaction reports: Analyses of mean scores and response style differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9172-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Fuchs, I., Sharabany, R., & Eisenberg, N. (1989). Students’ interactive and noninteractive behaviors in the classroom: A comparison between two types of classrooms in the city and the kibbutz in Israel. Contemporary Educational Psychology,14, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(89)90003-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayawickreme, E., Forgeard, M. J. C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). The engine of well-being. Review of General Psychology,16, 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H. (2005). The relation among fit indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,12, 368–390. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, K., Tremblay, R. E., Lacourse, E., Nagin, D. S., & Vitaro, F. (2006). Trajectories of prosocial behavior and physical aggression in middle childhood: Links to adolescent school dropout and physical violence. Journal of Research on Adolescence,16, 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00500.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, V. N., & Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2014). Promotion of child prosocial behavior in the school context. In A. Castro Solano (Ed.), Positive Psychology in Latin America (pp. 1–13). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, S. S., & Gudiño, O. G. (2016). Academic and mental health outcomes of youth placed in out-of-home care: The role of school stability and engagement. Child and Youth Care Forum,45, 807–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9357-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 1–17). Hoboken, NJ, US: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., Brentano, C., Dowling, E. M., & Anderson, P. M. (2002). Positive youth development: Thriving as a basis of personhood and civil society. New Directions for Youth Development,95, 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association,83, 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Mei, J., Tian, L., & Huebner, E. S. (2016). Age and gender differences in the relation between school-related social support and subjective well-being in school among students. Social Indicators Research, 125, 1065–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0873-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Tian, L., Huebner, E. S., Zheng, X., & Li, Z. (2015). Preliminary development of the elementary school students’ subjective well-being in school scale. Social Indicators Research, 120, 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0614-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, R. F., & Huebner, E. S. (2014). Differential validity and global and domain-specific measures of life satisfaction in the context of schooling. Child Indicators Research, 7, 671–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9231-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Eisenberg, N., Thartori, E., Pastorelli, C., Uribe Tirado, L. M., Gerbino, M., et al. (2017). Longitudinal relations among positivity, perceived positive school climate, and prosocial behavior in Colombian adolescents. Child Development,88, 1100–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12863.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin,131, 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases well-being and vitality even without contact with the beneficiary: Causal and behavioral evidence. Motivation and Emotion,40, 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9552-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midlarsky, E. (1991). Helping as coping. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 238–264)., Prosocial behavior Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, R. O. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Back to basics. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,4, 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519709540081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. C. (1992). The pursuit of happiness. New York, NY: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. K., Porta, M. D. D., Bao, K. J., Lee, H. J. C., Choi, I., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). ‘It’s up to you’: Experimentally manipulated autonomy support for prosocial behavior improves well-being in two cultures over six weeks. The Journal of Positive Psychology,10, 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.983959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, E. K., Laible, D., Carlo, G., Steele, J. S., & McGinley, M. (2014). Do sensitive parents foster kind children, or vice versa? Bidirectional influences between children’s prosocial behavior and parental sensitivity. Developmental Psychology,50, 1808–1816. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499920.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okun, M. A., Braver, M. W., & Weir, R. M. (1990). Grade level differences in school satisfaction. Social Indicators Research,22, 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. G., & Perry, L. C. (1987). Applications of dodge’s social information processing model of social competence to the study of prosocial behavior in children. Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Tokyo, Japan.

  • Qin, Y., Zhou, Y., Fan, F., Chen, S., Huang, R., Cai, R., et al. (2016). Developmental trajectories and predictors of prosocial behavior among adolescents exposed to the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Traumatic Stress,29, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (1997). Foreword. In R. Weissberg, T. P. Gullotta, R. L. Hampton, B. A. Ryan, & G. R. Adams (Eds.), Enhancing children’s wellness (Vol. 8, pp. 9–11). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saris, W. E. (1982). Different questions, different variables. In C. Fornell (Ed.), A second generation of multivariate analysis (Vol. 2, pp. 78–95). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. (2015). Positive and negative affect: Impact on empathy and prosocial behaviour among college going adolescents. The International Journal of Indian Psychology,2, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,76, 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snippe, E., Jeronimus, B. F., aan het Rot, M., Bos, E. H., de Jonge, P., & Wichers, M. (2018). The reciprocity of prosocial behavior and positive affect in daily life. Journal of Personality,86, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suldo, S. M., Bateman, L. P., & Gelley, C. D. (2014). Understanding and promoting school satisfaction in children and adolescents. In M. J. Furlong, R. Gilman, & E. S. Huebner (Eds.) Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 365–380). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,42, 131–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L. (2008). Developing scale for school well-being in adolescents. Psychological Development and Education, 24, 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L., Chu, S., & Huebner, E. S. (2016a). The chain of relations among gratitude, prosocial behavior and elementary school students’ school satisfaction: The role of school affect. Child Indicators Research, 9, 515–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9318-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L., Du, M., & Huebner, E. S. (2015a). The effect of gratitude on elementary school students’ subjective well-being in schools: The mediating role of prosocial behavior. Social Indicators Research, 122, 887-904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0712-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L., Wang, D., & Huebner, E. S. (2015b). Development and validation of the Brief Adolescents’ Subjective Well-Being in School Scale (BASWBSS). Social Indicators Research, 120, 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0603-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L., Zhang, L., Huebner, E. S., Zheng, X., & Liu, W. (2016b). The longitudinal relationship between school belonging and subjective well-being in school among elementary school students. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11, 1269–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9436-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyten, M., & Thijs, J. (2002). School satisfaction of elementary school children: The role of performance, peer relations, ethnicity and gender. Social Indicators Research,59, 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016279602893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118356258.ch7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. (2003). Study on relations among students’ prosocial behavior, peer relationships, Interpersonal trust, social desirability and self-esteem in the elementary and middle schools. Master’s thesis, Shanxi Normal University, Shanxi, China.

  • Wang, M., & Chen, H. (2000). Relations among primary schoolers’ academic achievement, prosocial behavior and peer acceptance/rejection. Psychological Development and Education. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2000.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. Z. (2011). Handbook of evaluating the effectiveness of psychological scale. Zheng Zhou: Zheng Zhou University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., & Huebner, E. S. (2015). Early adolescents’ personality and life satisfaction: A closer look at global vs. domain-specific satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,98, 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives,4, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management,17, 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Li, P., Fu, X., & Kou, Y. (2017). Orientations to happiness and subjective well-being in Chinese adolescents: The roles of prosocial behavior and internet addictive behavior. Journal of Happiness Studies,18, 1747–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9794-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. (2014). Happiness classroom construction from the perspective of positive psychology. Elementary and Secondary School Mental Health Education. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-2684.2014.20.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31971005), Humanities Social Sciences Research Planning Foundation from Ministry of Education, 2015 (No. 15YJA190003), the MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities, 2016 (No. 16JJD190002), and “13th Five-Year” Plan of Philosophy and Social Science Development in Guangzhou, 2018 (No. 2018GZGJ22).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lili Tian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Tian, L. & Huebner, E.S. Bidirectional Relations Between Subjective Well-Being in School and Prosocial Behavior Among Elementary School-Aged Children: A Longitudinal Study. Child Youth Care Forum 49, 77–95 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-019-09518-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-019-09518-4

Keywords

Navigation