Abstract
This study tested cross cultural measurement equivalence of three identity constructs by testing the factor invariance among participants from four nations. Data from measures of identity exploration, commitment, and distress were collected from university students in Mainland China (n = 85), Taiwan (n = 117), Japan (n = 117), and the United States (n = 223) using the Ego Identity Process Questionnaire (EIPQ) and the Identity Distress Scale (IDS). Invariance was not found for the Exploration subscale of the EIPQ, and only partial invariance was found for the Commitment subscale. The Identity Distress Scale did demonstrate invariance across all four samples. Differences varied by degree of Westernization (globalization) of the cultures under study. The results question the cross cultural validity of the EIPQ, particularly the identity exploration subscale. Results are discussed in terms of avenues for improving the cross cultural validity of assessments of identity constructs and implications for interventions that target identity processes to promote positive youth development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, G. R., Bennion, L., & Huh, K. (1989). Objective measure of ego identity status: A reference manual. Guelph, ON: Department of Family Studies, University of Guelph.
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.
Arnett, J. J. (2002). The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist, 57, 774–783.
Balistreri, E., Busch-Rossnagel, N. A., & Geisinger, K. F. (1995). Development and validation of the ego identity process questionnaire. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 179–192.
Berman, S. L., Kennerley, R. J., & Kennerley, M. A. (2008). Promoting positive adult identity development: A feasibility study of a university-based identity intervention program. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 8, 139–150.
Berman, S. L., Montgomery, M. J., & Kurtines, W. M. (2004). The development and validation of a measure of identity distress. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 4(1), 1–8.
Berman, S. L., Weems, C. F., & Petkus, V. (2009). The prevalence and incremental validity of identity problem symptoms in a high school sample. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 40, 183–195.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
Cloninger, S. (2008). Theories of personality: Understanding persons. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Côté, J. E., & Allahar, A. (1994). Generation on hold: Coming of age in the late twentieth century. Toronto: Stoddart.
Cross, S., Gore, J., & Morris, M. (2003). Relational-independent self-construal, self-concept consistency, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 933–944.
Dehon, C., Weems, C. F., Stickle, T. R., Costa, N. M., & Berman, S. L. (2005). A cross sectional evaluation of the factorial invariance of anxiety sensitivity in adolescents and young adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 799–810.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Ferrer-Wreder, L., Lorente, C., Kurtines, W., Briones, E., Bussel, J., Berman, S., et al. (2002). Promoting identity development in marginalized youth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17, 168–187.
Ferrer-Wreder, L., Montgomery, M. J., & Lorente, C. C. (2003). Identity promotion in adolescence. In T. Gullotta, J. Bloom, & G. Adams (Eds.), Encyclopedia of primary prevention and health promotion (pp. 600–607). Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Hernandez, L., Montgomery, M. J., & Kurtines, W. M. (2006). Identity distress and adjustment problems in at-risk adolescents. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 6, 27–33.
Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144.
Kline, R. B. (2006). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Kroger, J. (2007). Identity development: Adolescence through adulthood (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kurtines, W. M., Ferrer-Wreder, L., Berman, S. L., Lorente, C. C., Silverman, W. K., & Montgomery, M. J. (2008a). Promoting positive youth development: New directions in developmental theory, methods, and research. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 233–244.
Kurtines, W. M., Montgomery, M. J., Eichas, K., Ritchie, R., Garcia, A., Albrecht, R., et al. (2008b). Promoting positive identity development in troubled youth: A developmental intervention science outreach research approach. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 8, 125–138.
Lewis, H. (2003). Differences in ego identity among college students across age, ethnicity, and gender. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 3, 159–189.
Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76.
Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2006). Unpacking commitment and exploration: Validation of an integrative model of adolescent identity formation. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 361–378.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551–558.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2003). Culture, self, and the reality of the social. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 277–283.
Meilman, P. W. (1979). Cross-sectional age changes in ego identity status during adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 15, 230–231.
Ohnishi, H., Ibrahim, F. A., & Owen, S. V. (2001). Factor-analytic structures in the English and Japanese versions of the objective measure of ego-identity status (OMEIS). Current Psychology, 20, 250–259.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.
Parnjpe, A. C. (2010). Theories of self and cognition: Indian psychological perspectives. Psychology and Developing Societies, 22, 5–48.
Quintana, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1999). Implications of recent developments in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. Counseling Psychologist, 27, 485–527.
Rhee, E., Uleman, J. S., Lee, H. K., & Roman, R. J. (1995). Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 142–152.
Rotheram-Borus, M. J. (1989). Ethnic differences in adolescents’ identity status and associated behavior problems. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 361–374.
Schwartz, S. J., Adamson, L., Ferrer-Wreder, L., Dillon, F. R., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Identity status across contexts: Variations in measurement structure and mean levels among White American, Hispanic American, and Swedish emerging adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 61–76.
Schwartz, S. J., Kurtines, W. M., & Montgomery, M. J. (2005). A comparison of two approaches for facilitating identity exploration processes in emerging adults: An exploratory study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 309–345.
Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893–898.
Streitmatter, J. L. (1988). Ethnicity as a mediating variable of early adolescent identity development. Journal of Adolescence, 11, 335–346.
Stryker, S. (2003). Whither symbolic interaction? Reflections on a personal odyssey. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 95–109.
Tse, L. (1999). Finding a place to be: Ethnic identity exploration of Asian Americans. Adolescence, 34, 121–138.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.
Varela, R., Steele, R., & Benson, E. (2007). The contribution of ethnic minority status to adaptive style: A comparison of Mexican, Mexican American, and European American children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 26–33.
Yeh, C. J., & Huang, K. (1996). The collectivistic nature of ethnic identity development among Asian-American college students. Adolescence, 31, 645–661.
Ying, Y., & Lee, P. A. (1999). The development of ethnic identity in Asian-American adolescents: Status and outcome. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69, 194–208.
Zhou, H., Guo, Y., & Ke, S. (2008). The development of undergraduates’ self-identity process questionnaire. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16, 9–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berman, S.L., You, YF., Schwartz, S. et al. Identity Exploration, Commitment, and Distress: A Cross National Investigation in China, Taiwan, Japan, and the United States. Child Youth Care Forum 40, 65–75 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-010-9127-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-010-9127-1