Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

“A Bad Combination”: Lived Experiences of Youth Involved in the Foster Care and Juvenile Justice Systems

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Youth with involvement in foster care and the juvenile justice system, often called dual-status youth, are at increased risk for negative outcomes as they transition into adulthood, including homelessness, and involvement in the adult criminal justice system. Increase of interest in the phenomenon of youth dual involvement within the last decade, reveals focus on challenges associated with the dual-status population, the importance of multi-system collaboration, and foster care factors contributing to juvenile delinquency. This study aims to build on the current literature, through exploration of how dually-involved youth make sense of their experiences in the juvenile justice and foster care systems; and what youth believe are their unique challenges of being in two systems? This phenomenological study engaged ten individuals in Houston, Texas, between the ages of 18 and 24 years old, and previously involved in the juvenile justice and foster care systems. Research subjects participated in-depth, semi-structured, and audio-recorded interviews, disclosing their experiences in two systems. Interviews were transcribed and entered in the qualitative analytical program, Atlas.ti, where common themes of participant responses were extracted. Accounts from participants highlighted three key experiences: (1) experiences of and leading to dual involvement, (2) traumatic experiences, and (3) absence of normalcy. Study results are categorized based on their pathways to dual-involvement. This current study offers rich insights into how dually-involved youth make sense of their experiences in the foster care and juvenile justice systems. Implications for enhanced service provision among child welfare and juvenile justice professionals are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, S., & Barnett, M. E. (2015). The crossover youth practice model (CYPM): CYPM in Brief: Improving educational outcomes for crossover youth. Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy Center for Juvenile Justice Reform. Retrieved from https://cjjr.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/CYPM-In-Brief-Educational-Outcomes.pdf.

  • Abbott, S., & Barnett, M. E. (2018) The crossover youth practice model (CYPM): The protective potential of prosocial activities: A review of the literature and recommendations for child-serving agencies. Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy Center for Juvenile Justice Reform. Retrieved from https://cjjr.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/CYPM-In-Brief-Prosocial.pdf.

  • Abrams, L. S., Shannon, S. K., & Sangalang, C. (2008). Transition services for incarcerated youth: A mixed methods evaluation study. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(5), 522–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baglivio, M., Wolff, K., Piquero, A., Bilchik, S., Jackowski, K., Greenwald, M., et al. (2016). Maltreatment, child welfare, and recidivism in a sample of deep-end crossover youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(4), 625–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0407-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R. P. (1990). On their own: The experiences of youth after foster care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 7(5), 419–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, M. M. (2001). Understanding life experiences through a phenomenological approach to research. AORN Journal, 73(4), 830–832.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, Y. L., Ryan, J. P., & Herz, D. C. (2011). Allegations of maltreatment and delinquency: Does risk of juvenile arrest vary substantiation status? Children and Youth Services Review, 33(6), 855–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M., Haight, W., Choi, W. S., Hong, S., & Piescher, K. (2019). A prospective, longitudinal study of risk factors for early onset of delinquency among maltreated youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 102, 222–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, M. E., Piliavin, I., Grogan-Kaylor, A., & Nesmith, A. (2001). Foster youth transitions to adulthood: A longitudinal view of youth leaving care. Child Welfare, 80(6), 685.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing from five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. J., & Diversi, M. (2012). Aging out: Youths’ perspectives on foster care and the transition to independence. Qualitative Social Work, 12(5), 587–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierkhising, C. B., Herz, D., Hirsch, R. A., & Abbott, S. (2019). System backgrounds, psychosocial characteristics, and service access among dually involved youth: A Los Angeles case study. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 17(3), 309–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durdella, N. (2017). Qualitative dissertation methodology: A guide for research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, S. (2016). Improving multisystem collaboration for crossover youth. Advocates’ Forum, 1, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, J., Hawes, J., Westbrooks, A., & Henderson, C. (2018). Crossover youth and gender: What are the challenges of girls involved in both the foster care and juvenile justice systems? Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geenen, S., & Powers, L. E. (2007). “Tomorrow is another problem”: The experiences of youth in foster care during their transition into adulthood. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 1085–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haight, W. L., Bidwell, L. N., Marshall, J. M., & Khatiwoda, P. (2014). Implementing the Crossover Youth Practice Model in diverse contexts: Child welfare and juvenile justice professionals’ experiences of multisystem collaborations. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halemba, G., Siegel, G. C., Lord, R. D., & Zawacki, S. (2004). Arizona dual jurisdiction study. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, D. G., & Wood, C. (2011). Infusing qualitative traditions in counseling research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(3), 288–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, D. C., & Dierkhising, C. B. (2018). OJJDP dual system youth design study: Summary of findings and recommendations for pursuing a national estimate of dual system youth: Final technical report.

  • Herz, D. C., Dierkhising, C. B., Raithel, J., Schretzman, M., Guiltinan, S., George, R. M., et al. (2019). Dual-system youth and their pathways: A comparison of incidence, characteristics and system experiences using linked administrative data. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(12), 2432–2450.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herz, D. C., & Fontaine, A. M. (2013). Final data report for the crossover youth practice model, aggregate report, 2010/2011 cases (pp. 7–8). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Public Policy Institute, Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, D., Lee, P., Lutz, L., Stewart, M., Tuell, J., & Wiig, J. (2012). Addressing the needs of multi-system youth: Strengthening the connection between child welfare and juvenile justice. Washington, DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, D. C., & Ryan, J. P. (2008a). Exploring the characteristics and outcomes of 241.1 youth crossing over from dependency to delinquency in Los Angeles County. Center for Families, Children and the Courts Research Update, pp. 1–13. Retrieved from https://cjjr.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/CYPM.

  • Herz, D. C., & Ryan, J. P. (2008b). Bridging two worlds: Youth involved in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. A policy guide for improving outcomes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Public Policy Institute, Center for Juvenile Justice Reform. Retrieved from https://cjjr.georgetown.edu/resources/publications/.

  • Herz, D. C., Ryan, J. P., & Bilchik, S. (2010). Challenges facing crossover youth: An examination of juvenile-justice decision making and recidivism. Family Court Review, 48(2), 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, R. A., Dierkhising, C. B., & Herz, D. C. (2018). Educational risk, recidivism, and service access among youth involved in both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Children and Youth Services Review, 85, 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockenberry, S., & Puzzanchera, C. (2017). The national juvenile court data archive. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice, and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H., & Rhoden, M. A. (2017). The effectiveness of service integration: Studying the crossover youth practice model. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dc47/64dd24b654550c666788ebb81368f4bc762c.pdf.

  • Huang, H., Ryan, J. P., Sappleton, A., & Chiu, Y. L. (2015). Crossover youth post arrest: Placement status and recidivism. Children and Youth Services Review, 57, 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J., & Kammerer, N. (2009). Adolescents’ perspectives on placement moves and congregate settings: Complex and cumulative instabilities in out-of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(2), 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonson-Reid, M., & Barth, R. P. (2000). From maltreatment report to juvenile incarceration: The role of child welfare services. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(4), 505–520.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolivoski, K. M., Shook, J. J., Goodkind, S., & Kim, K. H. (2014). Developmental trajectories and predictors of juvenile detention, placement, and jail among youth with out-of-home child welfare placement. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 5(2), 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kools, S. M. (1997). Adolescent identity development in foster care. Family Relations, 46(3), 263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Villagrana, M. (2015). Differences in risk and protective factors between crossover and non-crossover youth in juvenile justice. Children and Youth Services Review, 58, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. M., & Haight, W. L. (2014). Understanding racial disproportionality affecting African American Youth who cross over from the child welfare to the juvenile justice system: Communication, power, race and social class. Children and Youth Services Review, 42, 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Higgins, A., Sebba, J., & Gardner, F. (2017). What are the factors associated with educational achievement for children in kinship or foster care: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 198–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onifade, E., Barnes, A., Campbell, C., Anderson, V., Petersen, J., & Davidson, W. (2014). Juvenile offenders and experiences of neglect: The validity of the YLS/CMI with dual-status youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piescher, K., Colburn, G., LaLiberte, T., & Hong, S. (2014). Child protective services and the achievement gap. Children and Youth Services Review, 47, 408–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. P., Herz, D., Hernandez, P. M., & Marshall, J. M. (2007). Maltreatment and delinquency: Investigating child welfare bias in juvenile justice processing. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(8), 1035–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. P., Marshall, J. M., Herz, D., & Hernandez, P. M. (2008). Juvenile delinquency in child welfare: Investigating group home effects. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(9), 1088–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. P., & Testa, M. F. (2005). Child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency: Investigating the role of placement and placement instability. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarri, R. C., Stoffregen, E., & Ryan, J. P. (2016). Running away from child welfare placements: Justice system entry risk. Children and Youth Services Review, 67, 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siennick, S. E., & Staff, J. (2008). Explaining the educational deficits of delinquent youths. Criminology, 46(3), 609–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Horton, S. Y. (2017). Providing age-appropriate activities for youth in foster care: Policy implementation process in three states. Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, S., & Zibulsky, J. (2015). Maltreatment, academic difficulty, and systems-involved youth: Current evidence and opportunities. Psychology in the Schools, 52(1), 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott, T., & Gustavsson, N. (2010). Balancing permanency and stability for youth in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(4), 619–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strolin-Goltzman, J., Kollar, S., & Trinkle, J. (2010). Listening to the voices of children in foster care: Youths speak out about child welfare workforce turnover and selection. Social Work, 55(1), 47–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2005). Research in organizations: Foundations and methods in inquiry. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unrau, Y. A., Seita, J. R., & Putney, K. S. (2008). Former foster youth remember multiple placement moves: A journey of loss and hope. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(11), 1256–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.03.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M. A., & Jaggers, J. W. (2017). Addressing the needs crossover youth: What key professionals are saying. Children and Youth Services Review, 75, 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. M., Spohn, R., Chenane, J., & Juliano, N. (2017). The importance of interagency collaboration for crossover youth: A research note. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15(4), 481–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, L. (2014). Closing the crossover gap: Amending fostering connections to provide independent living services for foster youth who crossover to the justice system. Family Court Review, 52(2), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., McCuish, E. C., & Corrado, R. R. (2017). Foster care beyond placement: Offending outcomes in emerging adulthood. Journal of Criminal Justice, 53, 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Work, College for Health, Community, & Policy, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

    Sherri Y. Simmons-Horton

Authors
  1. Sherri Y. Simmons-Horton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherri Y. Simmons-Horton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards of the Prairie View A&M University Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research Involving Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by the author.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simmons-Horton, S.Y. “A Bad Combination”: Lived Experiences of Youth Involved in the Foster Care and Juvenile Justice Systems. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 38, 583–597 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00693-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00693-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation