ABSTRACT
This study examined mental health and attachment problems in children in foster care. This study also obtained data concerning the validity of the Randolph Attachment Disorder Questionnaire (RADQ). Children were selected according to length of time in placement and age and screened for mental health symptoms using the Child Behavior Checklist and the RADQ. The findings showed that children in foster care have reported symptoms within the range typical of children not involved in foster care. The conclusion is that the RADQ has limited usefulness due to its lack of specificity with implications for treatment of children in foster care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T.M. Achenbach L.A. Rescorla (2001) Manual for the ASEBA School-age forms and profiles University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families Burlington, VT
InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.) American Psychiatric Association Washington, DC
R.F. Hanson E.G. Spratt (2000) ArticleTitleReactive attachment disorder: What we know about the disorder and implications for treatment Child Maltreatment 5 IssueID2 137–145
K.G. Moss (1997) Integrating attachment theory into special needs adoption Beech Brook Cleveland
Reber, K. (1996). Children at risk for reactive attachment disorder: Assessment diagnosis and treatment. In Progress: Family systems research and therapy (Vol. 5), (pp. 83–98). Encino, CA: Phillips Graduate Institute.
M.M. Richters F.R. Volkmar (1994) Reactive attachment disorder of infancy or early childhood M. Lewis (Eds) Child and adolescent psychiatry: A comprehensive textbook (2th ed.). Williams and Wilkins Baltimore, MD 498–502
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cappelletty, G.G., Brown, M.M. & Shumate, S.E. Correlates of the Randolph Attachment Disorder Questionnaire (RADQ) in a Sample of Children in Foster Placement. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 22, 71–84 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-005-2556-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-005-2556-2