Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The California Neighborhoods Data System: a new resource for examining the impact of neighborhood characteristics on cancer incidence and outcomes in populations

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on neighborhoods and health has been growing. However, studies have not investigated the association of specific neighborhood measures, including socioeconomic and built environments, with cancer incidence or outcomes. We developed the California Neighborhoods Data System (CNDS), an integrated system of small area-level measures of socioeconomic and built environments for California, which can be readily linked to individual-level geocoded records. The CNDS includes measures such as socioeconomic status, population density, racial residential segregation, ethnic enclaves, distance to hospitals, walkable destinations, and street connectivity. Linking the CNDS to geocoded cancer patient information from the California Cancer Registry, we demonstrate the variability of CNDS measures by neighborhood socioeconomic status and predominant race/ethnicity for the 7,049 California census tracts, as well as by patient race/ethnicity. The CNDS represents an efficient and cost-effective resource for cancer epidemiology and control. It expands our ability to understand the role of neighborhoods with regard to cancer incidence and outcomes. Used in conjunction with cancer registry data, these additional contextual measures enable the type of transdisciplinary, “cells-to-society” research that is now being recognized as necessary for addressing population disparities in cancer incidence and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaplan GA (2009) Hourglass Nation. In: School of Public Health (ed) Findings magazine. University of Michigan, Fall

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson RJ (2003) The impact of the built environment on health: an emerging field. Am J Public Health 93(9):1382–1384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Diez Roux AV (2003) The examination of neighborhood effects on health: conceptual and methodological issues related to the presence of multiple levels of organization. In: Kawachi I, Berkman LF (eds) Neighborhoods and Health. New York, Oxford University Press, pp 45–64

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnett E, Caspar M (2001) A definition of “social environment”. Am J Public Health 91(3):465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Srinivasan S, O’Fallon LR, Dearry A (2003) Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people: initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health. Am J Public Health 93(9):1446–1450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wikipedia. Built environment. In 2010

  7. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R (2003) Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: the public health disparities geocoding project (US). J Epidemiol Community Health 57(3):186–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berkman LF, Macintyre S (1997) The measurement of social class in health studies: old measures and new formulations. In: Kogevinas M, Pearce N, Susser M, Boffetta P (eds) Social inequalities and cancer. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, pp 51–64

    Google Scholar 

  9. Geronimus AT, Bound J (1998) Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: evidence from national samples. Am J Epidemiol 148(5):475–486

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Krieger N (1992) Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 82(5):703–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krieger N (2001) Socioeconomic data in cancer registries. Am J Public Health 91(1):156–157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gehlert S, Rebbeck T, Lurie N, Warnecke RB, Paskett E, Goodwin J (2007) Cells to society: overcoming health disparities. In: Institute NC (ed) Washington

  13. Warnecke RB, Oh A, Breen N, Gehlert S, Paskett E, Tucker KL, Lurie N, Rebbeck T, Goodwin J, Flack J, Srinivasan S, Kerner J, Heurtin-Roberts S, Abeles R, Tyson FL, Patmios G, Hiatt RA (2008) Approaching health disparities from a population perspective: the National Institutes of Health Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities. Am J Public Health 98(9):1608–1615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krieger N, Fee E (1994) Social class: the missing link in US health data. Int J Health Serv 24(1):25–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Haan M, Kaplan GA, Camacho T (1987) Poverty and health. Prospective evidence from the Alameda County study. Am J Epidemiol 125(6):989–998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Subramanian SV, Chen JT, Rehkopf DH, Waterman PD, Krieger N (2006) Comparing individual- and area-based socioeconomic measures for the surveillance of health disparities: a multilevel analysis of Massachusetts births, 1989–1991. Am J Epidemiol 164(9):823–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Winkleby M, Cubbin C, Ahn D (2006) Effect of cross-level interaction between individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on adult mortality rates. Am J Public Health 96(12):2145–2153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Winkleby MA, Cubbin C (2003) Influence of individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic status on mortality among black, Mexican-American, and white women and men in the United States. J Epidemiol Community Health 57(6):444–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yen IH, Kaplan GA (1999) Neighborhood social environment and risk of death: multilevel evidence from the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemiol 149(10):898–907

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Diez Roux AV (2001) Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health 91(11):1783–1789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Diez Roux AV (2004) The study of group-level factors in epidemiology: rethinking variables, study designs, and analytical approaches. Epidemiol Rev 26:104–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Diez Roux AV (2004) Estimating neighborhood health effects: the challenges of causal inference in a complex world. Soc Sci Med 58(10):1953–1960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boardman JD (2004) Stress and physical health: the role of neighborhoods as mediating and moderating mechanisms. Soc Sci Med 58:2473–2483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Feldman PJ, Steptoe A (2004) How neighborhoods and physical functioning are related: the roles of neighborhood socioeconomic status, perceived neighborhood strain, and individual health risk factors. Ann Behav Med 27(2):91–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Foster S, Giles-Corti B (2008) The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity: an exploration of inconsistent findings. Prev Med 47(3):241–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leyden KM (2003) Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. Am J Public Health 93(9):1546–1551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Subramanian SV (2004) The relevance of multilevel statistical methods for identifying causal neighborhood effects. Soc Sci Med 58(10):1961–1967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sampson RJ (2003) Neighborhood-level context and health: lessons from sociology. In: KawachiI BLe (ed) Neighborhoods and health. New York, Oxford University Press, pp 132–146

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Kawachi I, Berkman LF (2003) Neighborhoods and health. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Lurie N, Dubowitz T (2007) Health disparities and access to health. JAMA 297(10):1118–1121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Williams DR, Collins C (2001) Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Rep 116:404–416

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Glaser SL, Clarke CA, Gomez SL, O’Malley CD, Purdie DM, West DW (2005) Cancer surveillance research: a vital subdiscipline of cancer epidemiology. Cancer Causes Control 16:1009–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Howe HL, Edwards BK, Young JL, Shen T, West DW, Hutton M, Correa CN (2003) A vision for cancer incidence surveillance in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 14(7):663–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lubitz JD, Mentnech RM, Kessler LG (1993) Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database. Med Care 31(8):732–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF (2002) Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care 40(8 Suppl):IV-3-18

    Google Scholar 

  36. Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Lin YD, Johnson NJ, Schwartz SM, Bernstein L, Chen VW, Goodman MT, Gomez SL, Graff JJ, Lynch CF, Lin CC, Edwards BK (2007) Quality of race, Hispanic ethnicity, and immigrant status in population-based cancer registry data: implications for health disparity studies. Cancer Causes Control 18:177–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Singh GK, Lin YD, Goodman MT, Lynch CF, Schwartz SM, Chen VW, Bernstein L, Gomez SL, Graff JJ, Lin CC, Johnson NJ, Edwards BK (2009) Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal mortality study. Cancer Causes Control 20(4):417–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chan JK, Gomez SL, O’Malley CD, Perkins CI, Clarke CA (2006) Validity of cancer registry medicaid status against enrollment files: implications for population-based studies of cancer outcomes. Med Care 44(10):952–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Reynolds P, Urayama KY, Von Behren J, Feusner J (2004) Birth characteristics and hepatoblastoma risk in young children. Cancer 100(5):1070–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Von Behren J, Reynolds P (2003) Birth characteristics and brain cancers in young children. Int J Epidemiol 32(2):248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Reynolds P, Von Behren J, Gunier RB, Goldberg DE, Harnly M, Hertz A (2005) Agricultural pesticide use and childhood cancer in California. Epidemiology 16(1):93–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Reynolds P, Von Behren J, Gunier RB, Goldberg DE, Hertz A (2004) Residential exposure to traffic in California and childhood cancer. Epidemiology 15(1):6–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Von Behren J, Reynolds P, Gunier RB, Rull RP, Hertz A, Urayama KY, Kronish D, Buffler PA (2008) Residential traffic density and childhood leukemia risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(9):2298–2301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ward MH, Colt JS, Metayer C, Gunier RB, Lubin J, Crouse V, Nishioka MG, Reynolds P, Buffler PA (2009) Residential exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides and risk of childhood leukemia. Environ Health Perspect 117(6):1007–1013

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Burns PB, Swanson GM (1991) The occupational cancer incidence surveillance study (OCISS): risk of lung cancer by usual occupation and industry in the Detroit metropolitan area. Am J Ind Med 19(5):655–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Swanson GM, Schwartz AG, Brown KL (1985) Population-based occupational cancer incidence surveillance. Utilization of the telephone interview. J Occup Med 27(6):439–444

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Clarke CA, Miller T, Chang ET, Yin D, Cockburn M, Gomez SL (2010) Racial and social class gradients in life expectancy in contemporary California. Soc Sci Med 70(9):1373–1380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Yin R, Coull BA (2006) Race/ethnicity and changing US socioeconomic gradients in breast cancer incidence: California and Massachusetts, 1978–2002 (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17(2):217–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R (2002) Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol 156(5):471–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu L, Cozen W, Bernstein L, Ross RK, Deapen D (2001) Changing relationship between socioeconomic status and prostate cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(9):705–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE (1997) Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 18:341–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Krieger N, Zierler S, Hogan JW, Waterman PD, Chen J, Lemieux K, Gjelsvik A (2003) Geocoding and measurement of neighborhood socioeconomic position. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  53. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Subramanian SV (2003) Race/ethnicity, gender, and monitoring socioeconomic gradients in health: a comparison of area-based socioeconomic measures–the public health disparities geocoding project. Am J Public Health 93(10):1655–1671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Yost K, Perkins C, Cohen R, Morris C, Wright W (2001) Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control 12(8):703–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Chang ET, Shema SJ, Wakelee HA, Clarke CA, Gomez SL (2009) Uncovering disparities in survival after non-small-cell lung cancer among Asian/Pacific Islander ethnic populations in California. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(8):2248–2255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gomez SL, Clarke CA, Shema SJ, Chang ET, Keegan TH, Glaser SL (2010) Disparities in breast cancer survival among Asian women by ethnicity and immigrant status: a population-based study. Am J Public Health 100(5):861–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gomez SL, Glaser SL (2005) Quality of cancer registry birthplace data for Hispanics living in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 16(6):713–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gomez SL, Glaser SL (2006) Misclassification of race/ethnicity in a population-based cancer registry. Cancer Causes Control 17:771–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Gomez SL, Glaser SL, Kelsey JL, Lee MM (2004) Bias in completeness of birthplace data for Asian groups in a population-based cancer registry (United States). Cancer Causes Control 15(3):243–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Rhoads KF, Ackerson LK, Jha AK, Dudley RA (2008) Quality of colon cancer outcomes in hospitals with a high percentage of Medicaid patients. J Am Coll Surg 207(2):197–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Feuer EJ, Huang L, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Lewis DR, Eisner MP, Stinchcomb DG, Edwards BK (2009) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2006, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/, based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site. In: Institute NC (ed) Bethesda

  62. Great Circle Distance Calculations (2007) In: Data Analysis Tools: The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR)

  63. Takaki R (1989) Strangers from a different shore: a History of Asian Americans. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  64. Chung TL-N (2010) Asian American Health: discrepancies, convergence, and enclave-specific trends. In: Abesamis-Mendoza N, Ho-Asjoe H, Bateman WB (eds) Handbook of Asian American Health: taking notice and taking action. Greenwood Publishing Group, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  65. Robert SA, Strombom I, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM, McElroy JA, Newcomb PA, Remington PL (2004) Socioeconomic risk factors for breast cancer: distinguishing individual- and community-level effects. Epidemiology 15(4):442–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sanderson M, Coker AL, Perez A, Du XL, Peltz G, Fadden MK (2006) A multilevel analysis of socioeconomic status and prostate cancer risk. Ann Epidemiol 16(12):901–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Webster TF, Hoffman K, Weinberg J, Vieira V, Aschengrau A (2008) Community- and individual-level socioeconomic status and breast cancer risk: multilevel modeling on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Environ Health Perspect 116(8):1125–1129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Datta GD, Colditz GA, Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L (2006) Individual-, neighborhood-, and state-level socioeconomic predictors of cervical carcinoma screening among US black women: a multilevel analysis. Cancer 106(3):664–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Robert SA (1999) Socioeconomic position and health: the independent contribution of community socioeconomic context. Annu Rev Sociol 25:489–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Warner ET, Gomez SL (2010) Impact of neighborhood racial composition and metropolitan residential segregation on disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and survival between black and white women in California. J Commun Health

  71. Pickett KE, Pearl M (2001) Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health 55(2):111–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Subramanian SV, Chen JT, Rehkopf DH, Waterman PD, Krieger N (2005) Racial disparities in context: a multilevel analysis of neighborhood variations in poverty and excess mortality among black populations in Massachusetts. Am J Public Health 95(2):260–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Yen IH, Syme SL (1999) The social environment and health: a discussion of the epidemiologic literature. Annu Rev Public Health 20:287–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. MacIntyre S, MacIver S, Sooman A (1993) Area, class, and health: should we be focusing on places or people? J Soc Polic 22:213–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Gee GC, Payne-Sturges DC (2004) Environmental health disparities: a framework integrating psychosocial and environmental concepts. Environ Health Perspect 112(17):1645–1653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Oakes JM (2004) The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology. Soc Sci Med 58(10):1929–1952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Keegan THM, Hurley S, Goldberg D, Nelson DO, Reynolds P, Bernstein L, Horn-Ross PL, Gomez SL. The association between neighborhood characteristics and body size and physical activity in the California teachers study cohort. Am J Public Health (in press)

  78. Smith G, Gidlow C, Davey R, Foster C (2010) What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study of English adults’ definitions of their local walking neighbourhoods. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7:34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hubbard AE, Ahern J, Fleischer NL, Van der Laan M, Lippman SA, Jewell N, Bruckner T, Satariano WA (2010) To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health. Epidemiology 21(4):467–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. RAND. RAND California Community Statistics, http://ca.rand.org/stats/community/community.html. Accessed 30 Sep 09

  81. State of California Department of Justice. http://ag.ca.gov/crime.php. Accessed 29 Sep 2009

  82. Census 2000 Summary File 3—California. In: US Census Bureau, 2002

  83. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Subramanian SV (2005) Painting a truer picture of US socioeconomic and racial/ethnic health inequalities: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health 95(2):312–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Lee C, Moudon AV (2006) The 3Ds + R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transp Res Part D 11:204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes (2000) In: United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/RuralUrbanCommutingAreaCodes/

  86. Data Core Library Collection: Segregation Indices Data Series (2000) In: Rand’s Center for Population Health and Health Disparities (CPHHD)

  87. Acevedo-Garcia D, Lochner KA, Osypuk TL, Subramanian SV (2003) Future directions in residential segregation and health research: a multilevel approach. Am J Public Health 93(2):215–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Gee GC, Ro A, Shariff-Marco S, Chae D (2009) Racial discrimination and health among Asian Americans: evidence, assessment, and directions for future research. Epidemiol Rev 31:130–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Data Core Library Collection (2000) Street Connectivity Data Series. In: Rand’s Center for Population Health and Health Disparities (CPHHD)

  90. Pendola R, Gen S (2007) BMI, auto use, and the urban environment in San Francisco. Health Place 13(2):551–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. The Annual Utilization Report of Hospitals (2001) In: Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development

  92. ReferenceUSA-Business Data (2004) In: University of Texas at Austin. Available at: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/indexes/titles.html?id=305

  93. ArcGIS Business Analyst Online In: Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). Available at: http://www.esri.com/data/esri_data/business.html, 2004 and 2006

  94. Hoehner CM, Schootman M (2010) Concordance of commercial data sources for neighborhood-effects studies. J Urban Health 87(4):713–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Lee C, Vernez Moudon A (2006) Correlates of walking for transportation or recreation purposes. J Phys Act Health 3(Suppl 1):S77–S98

    Google Scholar 

  96. Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Garvin C, Rd DB, Schmid TL, Weathers RD (2007) Attributes of environments supporting walking. Am J Health Promot 21(5):448–459

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Jane Pham, Ms. June Kristine Winters, Mr. Andrew Hertz, and Dr. Myles Cockburn for their help with aspects of the work related to this manuscript. This study was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (R03 CA117324), and by a Rapid Response Surveillance Study from the SEER program under a modification to contract N01-PC-35136 awarded to the Cancer Prevention Institute of California. The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Health Services as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885; the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program under contract N01-PC-35136 awarded to the Cancer Prevention Institute of California, contract N01-PC-35139 awarded to the University of Southern California, and contract N02-PC-15105 awarded to the Public Health Institute; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Program of Cancer Registries, under agreement #U55/CCR921930-02 awarded to the Public Health Institute. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and endorsement by the State of California, Department of Health Services, the National Cancer Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or their contractors and subcontractors is not intended nor should be inferred.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scarlett Lin Gomez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gomez, S.L., Glaser, S.L., McClure, L.A. et al. The California Neighborhoods Data System: a new resource for examining the impact of neighborhood characteristics on cancer incidence and outcomes in populations. Cancer Causes Control 22, 631–647 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-011-9736-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-011-9736-5

Keywords

Navigation