Abstract
Objective
This exploratory study assessed relationships among education, tolerance for ambiguity, and genetic testing awareness in light of implications for cancer genetics education.
Methods
Cross-sectional analyses were conducted from self-administered written survey data of a breast cancer risk communication trial, including 899 Women’s Health patients recruited from 2003 to 2005. The modifying effect of tolerance for ambiguity on the relationship between educational background and breast cancer genetic testing awareness was assessed through logistic regression.
Results
There was a statistically significant main effect of education (p < 0.05), but not tolerance for ambiguity, on genetic testing awareness. However, the relationship between education and awareness was stronger among those with high tolerance for ambiguity (p for interaction <0.05), even when controlling for age, race, and breast cancer family history. Among persons with high (>1 SD above the mean) and medium tolerance for ambiguity, the relationship between education and awareness was positive and significant (p = 0.048 and 0.002, respectively). Among participants with low tolerance for ambiguity, the association was not significant.
Conclusions
Educational background may predict awareness knowledge of breast cancer genetic testing only for those with higher tolerance for ambiguity. These findings could inform future intervention research concerning education about cancer genetic testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guttmacher AE, Collins FS (2003) Welcome to the genomic era. N Engl J Med 349:996–998. doi:10.1056/NEJMe038132
Botkin JR, Smith KR, Croyle RT et al (2003) Genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation: prophylactic surgery and screening behavior in women 2 years post testing. Am J Med Genet A 118:201–209. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.10102
Claes E, Evers-Kiebooms G, Decruyenaere M et al (2005) Surveillance behavior and prophylactic surgery after predictive testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Behav Med 31:93–105. doi:10.3200/BMED.31.3.93-106
Collins V, Meiser B, Gaff C, St John DJ, Halliday J (2005) Screening and preventive behaviors one year after predictive genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 104:273–281. doi:10.1002/cncr.21183
Hadley DW, Jenkins JF, Dimond E, de Carvalho M, Kirsch I, Palmer CG (2004) Colon cancer screening practices after genetic counseling and testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:39–44. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.06.128
Halbert CH, Lynch H, Lynch J et al (2004) Colon cancer screening practices following genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) mutations. Arch Intern Med 164:1881–1887. doi:10.1001/archinte.164.17.1881
Kinney AY, Simonsen SE, Baty BJ et al (2006) Risk reduction behaviors and provider communication following genetic counseling and BRCA1 mutation testing in an African American kindred. J Genet Couns 15:293–305. doi:10.1007/s10897-006-9026-7
Pylvanainen K, Kairaluoma M, Mecklin JP (2006) Compliance and satisfaction with long-term surveillance in Finnish HNPCC families. Fam Cancer 5:175–178. doi:10.1007/s10689-005-5442-3
Wagner A, van Kessel I, Kriege MG et al (2005) Long term follow-up of HNPCC gene mutation carriers: compliance with screening and satisfaction with counseling and screening procedures. Fam Cancer 4:295–300. doi:10.1007/s10689-005-0658-9
Watson M, Kash KM, Homewood J, Ebbs S, Murday V, Eeles R (2005) Does genetic counseling have any impact on management of breast cancer risk? Genet Test 9:167–174. doi:10.1089/gte.2005.9.167
Hall MJ, Olopade OI (2006) Disparities in genetic testing: thinking outside the BRCA box. J Clin Oncol 24:2197–2203. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.05.5889
Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York
Smerecnik CM, Mesters I, de Vries NK, de Vries H (2008) Educating the general public about multifactorial genetic disease: applying a theory-based framework to understand current public knowledge. Genet Med 10:251–258. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31816b4ffd
Bottorff JL, Ratner PA, Balneaves LG et al (2002) Women’s interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:89–95
Bruno M, Tommasi S, Stea B et al (2004) Awareness of breast cancer genetics and interest in predictive genetic testing: a survey of a southern Italian population. Ann Oncol 15(Suppl 1):I48–I54. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh658
Tambor ES, Rimer BK, Strigo TS (1997) Genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: awareness and interest among women in the general population. Am J Med Genet 68:43–49. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970110)68:1<43::AID-AJMG8>3.0.CO;2-Z
Mogilner A, Otten M, Cunningham JD, Brower ST (1998) Awareness and attitudes concerning BRCA gene testing. Ann Surg Oncol 5:607–612. doi:10.1007/BF02303830
Welkenhuysen M, Evers-Kiebooms G, Decruyenaere M, Claes E, Denayer L (2001) A community based study on intentions regarding predictive testing for hereditary breast cancer. J Med Genet 38:540–547. doi:10.1136/jmg.38.8.540
Wideroff L, Vadaparampil ST, Breen N, Croyle RT, Freedman AN (2003) Awareness of genetic testing for increased cancer risk in the year 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Community Genet 6:147–156. doi:10.1159/000078162
Ludman EJ, Curry SJ, Hoffman E, Taplin S (1999) Women’s knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Eff Clin Pract 2:158–162
Gwyn K, Vernon SW, Conoley PM (2003) Intention to pursue genetic testing for breast cancer among women due for screening mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:96–102
Budner S (1962) Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. J Pers 30:29–50. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x
Frenkel-Brunswik E (1948) Tolerance toward ambiguity as a personality variable. Am Psychol 3:268
Prosen SS (1980) Ambiguity intolerance. In: Woody RH (ed) Encyclopedia of clinical assessment. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 463–472
Quillin JM, Lyckholm LJ (2006) A principle-based approach to ethical issues in predictive genetic testing for breast cancer. Breast Dis 27:137–148
Murray TH (1997) Genetic exceptionalism and future diaries: is genetic information different from other medical information? In: Rothstein MA (ed) Genetic secrets: protecting privacy and confidentiality in the genetic era. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 60–73
Guttmacher AE, Porteous ME, McInerney JD (2007) Educating health-care professionals about genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet 8:151–157. doi:10.1038/nrg2007
Schor R, Pilpel D, Benbassat J (2000) Tolerance of uncertainty of medical students and practicing physicians. Med Care 38:272–280. doi:10.1097/00005650-200003000-00004
Chase GA, Geller G, Havstad SL, Holtzman NA, Bassett SS (2002) Physicians’ propensity to offer genetic testing for Alzheimer’s disease: results from a survey. Genet Med 4:297–303. doi:10.1097/00125817-200207000-00008
Geller G, Tambor ES, Chase GA, Holtzman NA (1993) Measuring physicians’ tolerance for ambiguity and its relationship to their reported practices regarding genetic testing. Med Care 31:989–1001. doi:10.1097/00005650-199311000-00002
Bodurtha JN, Quillin JM, Borzelleca JB et al (2007) Recruiting diverse representative women to a randomized controlled trial as a practice model for cancer risk communication. J Natl Med Assoc 99(8):917–922
Tambor ES, Bernhardt BA, Chase GA et al (1994) Offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening to an HMO population: factors associated with utilization. Am J Hum Genet 55:626–637
Meischke H, Bowen D, Kuniyuki A (2001) Awareness of genetic testing for breast cancer risk among women with a family history of breast cancer: effect of women’s information sources on their awareness. Cancer Detect Prev 25:319–327
Dugas MJ, Buhr K, Ladouceur R (2004) The role of intolerance of uncertainty in etiology and maintenance. In: Heimberg RG, Turk CL, Mennin DS (eds) Generalized anxiety disorder: advances in research and practice. Guilford Press, New York, pp 143–163
Buhr K, Dugas MJ (2002) The intolerance of uncertainty scale: psychometric properties of the English version. Behav Res Ther 40:931–945. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00092-4
O’Neill SC, DeMarco T, Peshkin BN et al (2006) Tolerance for uncertainty and perceived risk among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 test results. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 142:251–259. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30104
Buhr K, Dugas MJ (2006) Investigating the construct validity of intolerance of uncertainty and its unique relationship with worry. J Anxiety Disord 20:222–236. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.12.004
Sorrentino RM, Roney CJR (2000) The uncertain mind: individual differences in facing the unknown. Psychology Press, Philadelphia
Skirton H (2001) The client’s perspective of genetic counseling—a grounded theory study. J Genet Couns 10:311–329. doi:10.1023/A:1016677110500
Webster DM, Kruglanski AW (1994) Individual differences in need for cognitive disclosure. J Pers Soc Psychol 67:1049–1062. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
Mishel MH (1981) The measurement of uncertainty in illness. Nurs Res 30:258–263. doi:10.1097/00006199-198109000-00002
Mishel MH, Padilla G, Grant M, Sorenson DS (1991) Uncertainty in Illness theory: a replication of the mediating effects of mastery and coping. Nurs Res 40:236–240
Lipkus IM, Hollands JG (1999) The visual communication of risk. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (25):149–163
Latimer AE, Katulak NA, Mowad L, Salovey P (2005) Motivating cancer prevention and early detection behaviors using psychologically tailored messages. J Health Commun 10(Suppl 1):137–155. doi:10.1080/10810730500263364
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute, R01 CA94213.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quillin, J.M., Silberg, J., Jones, R.M. et al. Tolerance for ambiguity could influence awareness of breast cancer genetic testing and inform health education. Cancer Causes Control 19, 1227–1232 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9193-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9193-y