Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Employee Cynicism: The Mediating Role of Organizational Trust

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines to what extent perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR) reduces employee cynicism, and whether trust plays a mediating role in the relationship between CSR and employee cynicism. Three distinct contributions beyond the existing literature are offered. First, the relationship between perceived CSR and employee cynicism is explored in greater detail than has previously been the case. Second, trust in the company leaders is positioned as a mediator of the relationship between CSR and employee cynicism. Third, we disaggregate the measure of CSR and explore the links between this and with employee cynicism. Our findings illustrate that the four distinct dimensions of CSR of Carroll (economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary) are indirectly linked to employee cynicism via organizational trust. In general terms, our findings will help company leaders to understand employees’ counterproductive reactions to an organization, the importance of CSR for internal stakeholders, and the need to engage in trust recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.uic.edu.hk/~kentsang/powerst/forbes-The%20Turnaround%20at%20Harley-Davidson.pdf.

  2. For discussion on mediating and intervening variables, see Hayes (2009) and Mathieu and Taylor (2006).

References

  • Adams, J., Tashchian, A., & Shore, T. (2001). Codes of ethics as signals for ethical behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(3), 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, S. L. (2002). Perceptions of integrity, competence and trust in senior management as determinants of cynicism toward change. Public Administration & Management, 7(4), 320–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49(11), 1395–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 8(5), 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K., Hatfield, J., & Carroll, A. (1983). Instrument development and application in CSR. Academy of Management Proceedings, 369–373.

  • Barbalet, J. M. (1996). Social emotions: Confidence, trust and loyalty. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 16(9/10), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T., Sakano, T., & Fujita, M. (1992). Roger, me, and my attitude: Film propaganda and cynicism toward corporate leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 768–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bews, N. F., & Rossouw, G. J. (2002). A role for business ethics in facilitating trustworthiness. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(4), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A., & Rubin, R. S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 733–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporation social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701–1719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, P., & Das, D. (2006). Locating behavioral cynicism at work: Construct issues and performance implications. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Employee health, coping and methodologies (research in occupational stress and well-being) (Vol. 5, pp. 233–266). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R., & Dean, J. W. (1999). Does organizational cynicism matter? Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes. In Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting of the Eastern Academy of Management, Philadelphia.

  • Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante, S. (2014). CSR, trust and the employer brand, CSR trends. In J. Reichel (Ed.), Beyond business as usual. Łódź: CSR Impact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(19), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaburu, D. S., Peng, A. C., Oh, I., Banks, G. C., & Lomelie, L. C. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrobot-Mason, D. L. (2003). Keeping the promise: Psychological contract violations for minority employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(1), 22–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. W., & Medley, D. M. (1954). Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 414–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Conway, N. (2004). The employment relationship through the lens of social exchange. In J. Coyle-Shapiro, L. Shore, S. Taylor & L. Tetrick (Eds.), The employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives (pp. 5–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The occupational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 302–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, I. (2000). The cynical manager. Management Learning, 31(3), 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K., & Ferrin, D. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sankar, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: Overcoming the trust barrier. Management Science, 57(9), 1528–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1992). The psychology of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Janovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, B., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Akremi, A., Gond, J.-P., Swaen, V., de Roeck, K., & Igalens, J. (2015). How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. Journal of Management, 0149206315569311.

  • Evans, W. R., Goodman, J. M., & Davis, D. D. (2011). The impact of perceived corporate citizenship on organizational cynicism, OCB, and employee deviance. Human Performance, 24, 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq, M., Farooq, O., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2014). Employees response to corporate social responsibility: Exploring the role of employees collectivist orientation. European Management Journal, 32, 916–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003). Working at a cynical distance: Implications for the power, subjectivity and resistance. Organisation, 10(1), 157–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, F. J. (2005). Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 737–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 215–245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, L., Ramos, A., Rosa, Á, Braga, A. C., & Sampaio, P. (2012). Impact of social responsibility programmes in stakeholder satisfaction: An empirical study of portuguese managers’ perceptions. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 9(5), 586–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frandsen, S. (2012). Organizational image, identification, and cynical distance: Prestigious professionals in a low-prestige organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 351–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits (pp. 122–126). New York: New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, C. A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, J. (2017). Common latent factor: Confirmatory factory analysis. Accessed March 15, 2018, from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/index.php?title=Confirmatory_Factor_Analysis&redirect=no#Common_Latent_Factor.

  • Gilbert, J. A., & Tang, T. L. P. (1998). An examination of organizational trust antecedents. Public Personnel Management, 27(3), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavas, A., & Godwin, L. (2013). Is the perception of ‘goodness’ good enough? Exploring the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee organizational identification. Journal Business Ethics, 114, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J.-P., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate social performance disoriented: Saving the lost paradigm? Business and Society, 49(4), 677–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, S., & Herrbach, O. (2009). Organizational trust and social exchange: What if taking good care of employees were profitable? Industrial Relations, 64(1), 6–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S. D., Alge, B. J., Brown, M. E., Jackson, C. L., & Dunford, B. B. (2013). Ethical leadership: Assessing the value of a multifoci social exchange perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S. D., Dunford, B. B., Alge, B. J., & Jackson, C. L. (2016). Corporate social responsibility, ethical leadership, and trust propensity: A multi-experience model of perceived ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 649–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S. D., Dunford, B. B., Boss, A. D., Boss, R. W., & Angermeier, I. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and the benefits of employee trust: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrbach, O., Mignonac, K., & Gatignon, A. L. (2004). Exploring the role of perceived external prestige in managers’ turnover intentions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(8), 1390–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. (1987). One more time: How do you motivate employees? (pp. 5–16). Boston: Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, N., & Jepsen, D. M. (2009). Career stage and generational differences in psychological contracts. Career Development International, 14(3), 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, K. (1993). The social context of organizational justice: Cultural, intergroup, and structural effects on justice behaviors and perceptions. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness inhuman resources management (pp. 21–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. (2003). The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 627–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, D., & Mirvis, P. (1989). The cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusion. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A., Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., & Martinuzzi, A. (2006). Empirical findings on business-society relations in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(1), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 370–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., Wiethoff, C., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2005). What is the role of trust in organizational justice? In Handbook of organizational justice (247–270). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limerick, D., & Cunnington, B. (1993). Managing the new organisation: A blueprint for networks and strategic alliances. Chatswood: Business and Professional Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 455–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1031–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 874–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., & Ritchie, J. B. (1971). Participative management: Quality vs. quantity. California Management Review, 13, 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo, S., & Shi, J. (2017). Linking ethical leadership to employee burnout, workplace deviance and performance: Testing the mediating roles of trust in leader and surface acting. Journal of Business Ethics, 144, 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., Aguinis, H., Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S. (2013). Extending corporate social responsibility research to the human resource management and organizational behavior domains: A look to the future. Personnel Psychology, 66, 805–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S., Borman, W., & Schmit, M. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustain, M. (2014). Overcoming cynicism: William James and the metaphysics of engagement. New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naus, F., Van Iterson, A., & Roe, R. (2007). Organizational cynicism: Extending the exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect model of employees’ responses to adverse conditions in the workplace. Human Relations, 60(5), 683–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neves, P. (2012). Organizational cynicism: Spillover effects on supervisor–subordinate relationships and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 965–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhan, R. C. (1999). Increasing affective organizational commitment in public organizations: The key role of interpersonal trust. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19, 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, M. (2003). From paternalism to cynicism: Narratives of a newspaper company. Human Relations, 56(6), 685–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osveh, E., Singaravello, K., & Boerhannoeddin, A. (2015). Linkage between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Mediation effect of organizational identification. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 5(3), 174–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özler, D. E., Atalay, C. (2011). A research to determine the relationship between organizational cynicism and burnout levels of employees in health sector. Business and Management Review, 1(4), 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Lee, H., & Kim, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers’ perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persais, E. (2007). La RSE est-elle une question de convention? Revue Française de Gestion, 172(3), 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business and Society, 43(3), 296–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D., Rhoads, A., & Vaught, B. C. (2001). Ethical beliefs of business professionals: A study of gender, age and external factors. Journal of Business, 31(3), 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, M. (2014). Business success beyond the short term: CEO perspectives on sustainability. In 17th annual global CEO survey summary: sustainability, CEO survey insights.

  • Pugh, S. D., Skarlicki, D. P., & Passell, B. S. (2003). After the fall: Layoff victims’ trust and cynicism in re-employment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(2), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A crossdiscipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 537–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance–corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 540–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shum, P. K., & Yam, S. L. (2011). Ethics and law: Guiding the invisible hand to correct corporate social responsibility externalities. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 549–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1994). Using self-report questions in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaen, V., & Chumpitaz, R. C. (2008). Impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 23(4), 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 862–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Ngo, H. (2016). Ethical leadership behavior and employee justice perceptions: The mediating role of trust in organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Serrano Archimi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author A declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Author B declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Author C declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Author D declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study that involved human participants were carried out in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serrano Archimi, C., Reynaud, E., Yasin, H.M. et al. How Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Employee Cynicism: The Mediating Role of Organizational Trust. J Bus Ethics 151, 907–921 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3882-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3882-6

Keywords

Navigation