Skip to main content
Log in

Karma-Yoga: The Indian Model of Moral Development

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive model of moral development must encompass moral sensitivity, moral reasoning, moral motivation, and moral character. Western models of moral development have often failed to show validity outside the culture of their origin. We propose Karma-Yoga, the technique of intelligent action discussed in the Bhagawad Gita as an Indian model for moral development. Karma-Yoga is conceptualized as made up of three dimensions viz. duty-orientation, indifference to rewards, and equanimity. Based on survey results from 459 respondents from two large Indian organizations, we show that the dimensions of Karma-Yoga are related to moral sensitivity, moral motivation, and moral character.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, M., & Dalal, A. K. (1993). Beliefs about the world and recovery from myocardial infarction. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersoff, D. M., & Miller, J. G. (1993). Culture, context, and the development of moral accountability judgments. Developmental Psychology, 29, 664–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinmayananda, S. (1989). The Bhagavad Geeta: Chapter I & II. Mumbai: Central Chinmaya Mission Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connors, J., & Heaven, P. C. L. (1990). Belief in a just world and attitudes toward AIDS sufferers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 559–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T, Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W. C. (1985). Kohlberg’s stages of moral development. In Theories of development (pp. 118–136). Prentice Hall. Retreived on October 17, 2006 from http://faculty.plts.edu/gpence/html/kohlberg.htm

  • Dalal, A. K., & Pande, N. (1988). Psychological recovery of accident victims with temporary and permanent disability. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. (1991). A history of Indian philosophy (Vol. 1). Delhi: Motilal Banarasidas. (Original work published 1922).

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1994). Moral development and its measurement across cultures. In W. J. Lonner & R. Melpass (Eds.), Psychology and culture. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferns, I., & Thom, D. P. (2001). Moral development of black and white South African adolescents: Evidence against cultural universality in Kohlberg’s theory. South African Journal of Psychology, 31, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, G., Cameron, C. A., Xu, F., Heyman, G., & Lee, K. (2007). Cross-cultural differences in children’s choices, categorizations, and evaluations of truths and lies. Developmental Psychology, 43, 278–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (2001). The gospel of selfless action. (M. Desai, Trans.). Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House. (Original work published 1946).

  • Ghanananda, S. (1958). The dawn of Indian philosophy. In S. Radhakrishnan, H. Bhattacharyya, R. C. Majumdar, S. K. Chatterji, H. Kabir, S. K. De, et al. (Series Eds.) & S. K. Chatterji, N. Dutt, A. D. Pusalker, & N. K. Bose (Vol. Eds.), The cultural heritage of India: Vol. 1. The early phases (2nd ed., pp. 333–344). Kolkata, India: The Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture.

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafer, C. L., & Begue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, V. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., Akoh, H., & Miura, K. (1990). Credit and blame among American and Japanese children: Normative, cultural, and individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 442–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, S., Edwards, C. P., & Super, C. A. (1981). Social roles and moral reasoning: A case study in a rural African community. Developmental Psychology, 17, 595–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M. (1992). The “Big Five” personality variables- Construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Personality Item Pool. (2001). A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. Retrieved August 18, 2005, from http://ipip.ori.org/.

  • Judge, T. A., Martocchio, J. J., & Thoresen, C. J. (1997). Five-factor model of personality and employee absence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 745–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N., & Mendonca, M. (1996). Ethical dimensions of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M., & Mayhew, M. J. (2002). Moral judgment development in higher education: Insights from the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, V. R. (2001). Value systems of transformational leaders. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 22, 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, V. R. (2003). Modernization without demolishing cultural roots: The role of transformational leadership. In J. Gifford & G. Zezulka-Mailloux (Eds.), Culture and the State, Volume 4 (Alternative Interventions) (pp. 164–173). Edmonton: Canada Research Chairs Humanities Studio, University of Alberta,.

  • Mahadevan, T. M. P. (1958). The religio-philosophic culture of India. In S. Radhakrishnan, H. Bhattacharyya, R. C. Majumdar, S. K. Chatterji, H. Kabir, S. K. De, et al. (Series Eds.) & S. K. Chatterji, N. Dutt, A. D. Pusalker, & N. K. Bose (Vol. Eds.), The cultural heritage of India: Vol. 1. The early phases (2nd ed., pp. 163–181). Kolkata, India: The Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture.

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (1985). Updating Norman’s “adequacy taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and its questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. (2007). Retrieved May 18, 2007, from http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/

  • Miller, J. G., & Bersoff, D. M. (1992). Culture and moral judgment: How are conflicts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G., Bersoff, D. M., & Harwood, R. L. (1990). Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: Moral imperatives or personal decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulla, Z. R., & Krishnan, V. R. (2006). Karma Yoga: A conceptualization and validation of the Indian philosophy of work. Journal of Indian Psychology, 24(1/2), 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla, Z. R., & Krishnan, V. R. (2007). Karma-Yoga: Construct validation using value systems and emotional intelligence. South Asian Journal of Management, 14(4), 116–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla, Z. R., & Krishnan, V. R. (2008). Karma-Yoga, the Indian work ideal, and its relationship with empathy. Psychology and Developing Societies, 20(1), 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulla, Z. R., & Krishnan, V. R. (2011). Is Karma-Yoga possible? Can we be hardworking without being ambitious? Great Lakes Herald, 5(2), 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., Getz, I., Rest, J. R., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Individual moral judgment and cultural ideologies. Developmental Psychology, 35, 478–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., & Rest, J. R. (1995). The four components of acting morally. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewitz (Eds.), Moral behavior and moral development: An introduction (pp. 385–400). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisan, M. (1987). Moral norms and social conventions: A cross-cultural comparison. Developmental Psychology, 23, 719–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhavananda, S. (1960). The spiritual heritage of India. Hollywood, CA: Vedanta Society of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan, S. (1926). The Hindu view of life. HarperCollins Publishers India.

  • Radhakrishnan, S. (1940). Indian philosophy: Vol. 1. London: George Allen & Unwin.

  • Radhakrishnan, S. (1948/1993). The Bhagvadgita. HarperCollins. Publishers India.

  • Rahim, A. (1981). Organizational behavior courses for graduate students in business administration: Views from the tower and battlefield. Psychological Reports, 49, 583–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1975). Longitudinal study of the Defining Issues Test of moral judgment: A strategy for analyzing developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 11, 738–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1990). Manual for the defining issues test-third edition. Center for the Study of Ethical Development, University of Minnesota. (Original published in 1979).

  • Rest, J. R., Cooper, D., Coder, R., Masanz, J., & Anderson, D. (1974). Judging the important issues in moral dilemmas—An objective measure of development. Development Psychology, 10, 491–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999a). A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT and schema theory. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 291–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., & Thoma, S. J. (1999b). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 644–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., & Thoma, S. J. (1985). Relation of moral judgment development to formal education. Developmental Psychology, 21, 709–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., Thoma, S. J., & Edwards, L. (1997a). Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., Thoma, S. J., Narvaez, D., & Bebeau, M. J. (1997b). Alchemy and beyond: Indexing the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 498–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–90). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1990). Culture and moral development. In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology. Essays on comparative human development, (pp. 130–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “Big Three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity), and the “Big Three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J. B. P., Singh, S., Gupta, P., Srivastava, K. B. L., Sinha, R. B. N., Srivastava, S., et al. (2010). An exploration of the Indian mindset. Psychological Studies, 55, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snarey, J. R. (1985). Cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: A critical review of Kohlbergian research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 202–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snarey, J., & Lydens, L. (1990). Worker equality and adult development: The Kibbutz as a developmental model. Psychology and Aging, 5, 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snarey, J. R., Reimer, J., & Kohlberg, L. (1985). Development of social-moral reasoning among Kibbutz adolescents: A longitudinal cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology, 21, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., Smetana, J. G., & Kim, S. Y. (1987). Korean children’s conceptions of moral and conventional transgressions. Developmental Psychology, 23, 577–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. L., Carson, K. P., & Cardy, R. L. (1996). The joint effects of conscientiousness and self-leadership training on employee self-directed behavior in a service setting. Personnel Psychology, 49, 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. J., Rest, J. R., & Davison, M. L. (1991). Describing and testing a moderator of the moral judgment and action relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tietjen, A. M., & Walker, L. J. (1985). Moral reasoning and leadership among men in a Papua New Guinea society. Developmental Psychology, 21, 982–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilak, B. G. (2000). Srimad Bhagavadgita-Rahasya, (B. S. Sukhantar, Trans.). Poona: Kesari Press. (Original work published 1915).

  • Turner, N., Barling, J., Epitropaki, O., Butcher, V., & Milner, C. (2002). Transformational leadership and moral reasoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 304–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivekananda, S. (1972). The complete works of Swami Vivekananda (eight volumes). Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C. B., Bushnell, N., & Regnemer, J. L. (1978). Moral development in Bahamian school children: A 3-year examination of Kohlberg’s stages of moral development. Developmental Psychology, 14, 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zubin R. Mulla.

Appendix

Appendix

Scale for Karma-Yoga (duty-orientation)

  1. 1.

    I am aware of my obligations to others.

  2. 2.

    I feel it is my duty to contribute to others.

  3. 3.

    I hesitate to do what is expected of me (negatively scored).

  4. 4.

    I willingly do whatever task is assigned to me.

  5. 5.

    I gladly perform all duties, which are allotted to me.

  6. 6.

    Once I agree to do a task, I make sure that I complete it.

Scale for Karma-Yoga (indifference to rewards)

  1. 1.

    I expect to be rewarded for whatever work I do (negatively scored).

  2. 2.

    While working, I keep thinking about what I will get in return (negatively scored).

  3. 3.

    I work only when I see that there is some personal benefit for me (negatively scored).

  4. 4.

    I cannot work when I know that I will not get anything in return for my efforts (negatively scored).

  5. 5.

    When I am given a task, I first think about how I will benefit from it (negatively scored).

  6. 6.

    When I do something well, I expect recognition from others (negatively scored).

Scale for Karma-Yoga (equanimity)

  1. 1.

    I am neutral toward success and failure.

  2. 2.

    Compared to others, I get less depressed if I fail on a task.

  3. 3.

    Compared to others, I get less excited by my success.

  4. 4.

    I can work well only when my environment is comfortable (negatively scored).

  5. 5.

    I do not get distracted by physical discomforts when I am working.

  6. 6.

    I can remain concentrated on my work even if I am uncomfortable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulla, Z.R., Krishnan, V.R. Karma-Yoga: The Indian Model of Moral Development. J Bus Ethics 123, 339–351 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1842-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1842-8

Keywords

Navigation