Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Additional Evidence Against Shared Environmental Contributions to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent meta-analysis “Burt (Psychol Bull 135:608–637, 2009)” indicated that shared environmental influences (C) do not contribute to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Unfortunately, the meta-analysis relied almost exclusively on classical twin studies. Although useful in many ways, some of the assumptions of the classical twin model (e.g., dominant genetic and shared environmental influences do not simultaneously influence the phenotype) can artifactually decrease estimates of C. There is thus a need to confirm that dominant genetic influences are not suppressing estimates of C on ADHD. The current study sought to do just this via the use of a nuclear twin family model, which allows researchers to simultaneously model and estimate dominant genetic and shared environmental influences. We examined two independent samples of child twins: 312 pairs from the Michigan State University Twin Registry and 854 pairs from the PrE School Twin Study in Sweden. Shared environmental influences were found to be statistically indistinguishable from zero and to account for less than 5 % of the variance. We conclude that the presence of dominant genetic influences does not account for the absence of C on ADHD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Wood et al. (2010) also noted that classical twin studies are limited by issues of low statistical power to detect shared environmental influences. While an important point, analyses in Burt (2010) indicated that low power was highly unlikely to explain the meta-analytic results of Burt (2009). Indeed, Burt (2009) had more than 80 % power to detect C as small as 5 %.

  2. Teacher reports of child ADHD were also collected in both samples. These informant-reports were correlated with mother and father reports of child ADHD (rs ranged from 0.24 to 0.35 across samples and informants), magnitudes that are fully consistent with typical cross-informant correlations (Achenbach et al. 1987). Unfortunately, teacher reports of child ADHD were not associated with maternal or paternal reports of their own ADHD in either sample (rs were 0.00 and 0.10, respectively, in sample one, both ns, and 0.02 and −0.01, respectively, in sample two, both ns). They are thus inappropriate for analysis using the nuclear twin family model, as additive genetic effects would be estimated to be zero under this scenario [an implausible result given the findings presented here, the results of prior twin and adoption studies (Burt 2009), and the meta-analytically confirmed association of specific candidate genes with ADHD (e.g., DAT1; Faraone and Khan 2006)]. Future studies should explore the role of informant effects on results obtained from the nuclear twin family model.

References

  • Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2003) Manual for ASEBA adult forms and profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach TM, McConaughy SH, Howell CT (1987) Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull 101:213–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1987) Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52:317–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker LA, Barton M, Raine A (2002) The Southern California Twin Register at the University of Southern California. Twin Res 5:456–459

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels M, van den Oord EJCG, Hudziak JJ, Rietveld MJH, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Boomsma DI (2004) Genetic and environmental mechanisms underlying stability and change in problem behaviors at ages 3, 7, 10, and 12. Dev Psychol 40:852–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt SA (2009) Rethinking environmental contributions to child and adolescent psychopathology: a meta-analysis of shared environmental influences. Psychol Bull 135:608–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt SA (2010) Are there shared environmental influences on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Reply to Wood, Buitelaar, Rijsdijk, Asherson, and Kuntsi (2010). Psychol Bull 136:341–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt SA, Barnes AR, McGue M, Iacono WG (2008) Parental divorce and adolescent delinquency: ruling out the impact of common genes. Dev Psychol 44:1668–1677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt SA, McGue M, Iacono WG (2010) Environmental contributions to the stability of antisocial behavior over time: are they shared or non-shared? J Abnorm Child Psychol 38:327–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos FX, Sharp WS, Gottesman RF, Greenstein DK, Giedd JN, Rapoport JL (2003) Anatomic brain abnormalities in monozygotic twins discordant for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 160:1693–1696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Z, Lichtenstein P, Asherson PJ, Larsson H (2012) A developmental twin study of attention problems: evidence for genetic stability and innovation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32(2):140–149

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPaul GJ, Anastopoulos AD, Power TJ, Reid R, Ikeda M, McGoey KE (1998) Parent ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Factor structure, normative data, and psychometric properties. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 20:83–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faraone SV, Khan SA (2006) Candidate gene studies of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 67(Supp 8):13–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart EL, Lahey BB, Loeber R, Hanson KS (1994) Criterion validity of informants in the diagnosis of disruptive behavior disorders in children: a preliminary study. J Consult Clin Psychol 62:410–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hay DA, McStephen M, Levy F, Pearsall-Jones J (2002) Recruitment and attrition in twin register studies of childhood behavior: the example of the Australian twin ADHD project. Twin Res 5:324–328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heath AC, Nyholt DR, Neuman R, Madden PA, Bucholz KK, Todd RD, Martin NG (2003) Zygosity diagnosis in the absence of genotypic data: an approach using latent class analysis. Twin Res 6:22–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks BM, South SC, DiRago AC, Iacono WG, McGue M (2009) Environmental adversity and increasing genetic risk for externalizing disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 66:640–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hultman CM, Torrång A, Tuvblad C, Cnattingius S, Larsson J-O, Lichtenstein P (2007) Birth weight and attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms in childhood and early adolescence: a prospective Swedish twin study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46:370–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humbad MN, Donnellan MB, Iacono WG, Burt SA (2010) The association of marital quality with personality and psychopathology: results from a very large sample of married couples. J Abnorm Psychol 119:151–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen PS, Rubio-Stipec M, Canino G, Bird HR, Duncan MK, Schwab-Stone ME, Lahey BB (1999) Parent and child contributions to diagnosis of mental disorder: are both informants always necessary? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 38:1569–1579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller MC, Coventry WL (2005) Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design. Twin Res Hum Gen 8:201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller MC, Medland SE (2008) Evaluation of the cascade model—a new extended twin family model. Paper presented at the Behavioral Genetics Association, Louisville

  • Keller MC, Medland SE, Duncan LE (2010) Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models. Behav Genet 40:377–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler RC, Adler L, Ames M, Demler O, Faraone S, Hiripi E, Spencer T (2005) The World Health Organization adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychol Med 35:245–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klahr AM, McGue M, Iacono WG, Burt SA (2011) The association between parent–child conflict and adolescent conduct problems over time: results from a longitudinal adoption study. J Abnorm Psychol 120:46–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klump KL, Burt SA (2006) The Michigan State University Twin Registry (MSUTR): genetic, environmental, and neurobiological influences on behavior across development. Twin Res Hum Genet 9:971–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson H, Lichtenstein P, Larsson J-O (2006) Genetic contributions to the development of ADHD-subtypes from childhood to adolescence. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45:973–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehn H, Derks EM, Hudziak JJ, Heutink P, van Beijsterveldt TC, Boomsma DI (2007) Attention problems and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in discordant and concordant monozygotic twins: evidence of environmental mediators. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein P, Tuvblad C, Larsson H, Carlstrom E (2007) The Swedish twin study of child and adolescent development: the TCHAD-study. Twin Res Hum Genet 10:67–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin NG, Eaves LJ, Kearsey MJ, Davies P (1978) The power of the classical twin study. Heredity 40:97–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGue M, Bouchard TJJ (1984) Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behav Genet 14:325–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2006) Mplus user’s guide. Muthén and Muthén, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Narusyte J, Neiderhiser JM, Andershed A-K, D’Onofrio BM, Reiss D, Spotts EL, Lichtenstein P (2011) Parental criticism and externalizing behavior problems in adolescents—the role of environment and genotype–environment correlation. J Abnorm Psychol 120:365–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH (2003) Mx: statistical modeling, 6th edn. Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond

  • Nikolas M, Burt SA (2010) Genetic and environmental influences on ADHD symptom dimensions of inattention and hyperactivity: a meta-analysis. J Abnorm Psychol 119:1–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters H, Van Gestel S, Vlietinck R, Derom C, Derom R (1998) Validation of a telephone zygosity questionnaire in twins of known zygosity. Behav Genet 28(3):159–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin R, Daniels D (1987) Why are children in the same family so different from one another? Behav Brain Sci 10:1–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin R, DeFries JC, McClearn GE, McGruffin P (2008) Behavioral genetics, 5th edn. Worth Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftery AE (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol Methodol 25:111–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saviouk V, Hottenga J–J, Slagboom EP, Distel MA, de Geus EJC, Willemsen G, Boomsma DI (2011) ADHD in Dutch adults: heritability and linkage study. Am J Med Genet B 156:352–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sclove LS (1987) Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika 53(3):333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J Roy Stat Soc B 64(4):583–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkheimer E (2000) Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 13:160–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkheimer E, Waldron M (2000) Nonshared environment: a theoretical, methodological, and quantitative review. Psychol Bull 126:78–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuvblad C, Grann M, Lichtenstein P (2006) Heritability for adolescent antisocial behavior differs with socioeconomic status: gene–environment interaction. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47:734–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuvblad C, Narusyte J, Grann M, Sarnecki J, Lichtenstein P (2011) The genetic and environmental etiology of antisocial behavior from childhood to emerging adulthood. Behav Genet 41:629–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood AC, Buitelaar JK, Rijsdijk F, Asherson P, Kuntsi J (2010) Rethinking shared environment as a source of variance underlying attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms: comment on Burt (2009). Psychol Bull 136:331–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sample one was supported by R01-MH081813 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health. Sample two was supported by grants from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research and from the Swedish Research Council. The authors thank all participating twins and their families.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Alexandra Burt.

Additional information

Edited by Valerie Knopik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burt, S.A., Larsson, H., Lichtenstein, P. et al. Additional Evidence Against Shared Environmental Contributions to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems. Behav Genet 42, 711–721 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-012-9545-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-012-9545-y

Keywords

Navigation