Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Relationship Between the Genetic and Environmental Influences on Common Internalizing Psychiatric Disorders and Mental Well-Being

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the relationship between the genetic and environmental risk factors for common internalizing psychopathology (IP) and mental well-being (MWB), we examined detailed measures of emotional, social and psychological well-being, and a history of major depression (MD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and panic attacks in the last year, in 1,386 twins from same-sex pairs from the MIDUS national USA sample assessed in 1995 and then again in 2005. Statistical analyses were performed with the Mx program. In the 1995 data, the best fit model contained one substantially heritable common factor for MD, GAD and panic attacks, and one strongly heritable common factor for the three well-being measures. Genetic and environmental risk factors for IP accounted for, respectively, 50 and 5%, of the genetic and environmental influences on MWB. We then constructed, using 1995 and 2005 data, two common factors that reflected temporally stable influences on (i) MD and GAD, and (ii) on emotional and psychological well-being. Genetic and environmental risk factors for the stable liability to IP accounted for 41 and 29% of the stable genetic and environmental influences, respectively, on MWB. This study suggests that genetic risk factors for IP make up 41–50% of the genetic influences on MWB. The overlap of environmental risk factors is more modest. Although low levels of IP on average reflect a high genetic propensity for MWB, other independent genetic influences play an important role in producing good mental health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The well-being literature does not have a common set of terms for describing these dimensions. While many psychologist tend to refer to emotional well-being as “subjective well-being,” Keyes argues that all three dimensions of MWB are subjective assessments of well-being that are more clearly identified by whether the measures focus on feeling states (i.e., hedonia) toward one’s life or how well individuals see themselves functioning in their lives (i.e., eudaimonia), with the latter being distinguished in terms of whether the functioning is psychological (i.e., more private and personal) or social (i.e., more public and communal). For consistency with the past research, which involves the same model in this article, we employ Keyes’ terminology.

References

  • Andrews FM, Withey SB (1976) Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn NM (1969) The structure of psychological well-being. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril H (1965) The pattern of human concerns. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher MW, Lopez SJ, Preacher KJ (2009) The hierarchical structure of well-being. J Pers 77(4):1025–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurin G, Veroff J, Feld S (1960) Americans view their mental health. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettema JM, Neale MC, Kendler KS (2001) A review and meta-analysis of the genetic epidemiology of anxiety disorders. Am J Psychother 158(10):1568–1578

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler KS, Prescott CA, Myers J, Neale MC (2003) The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for common psychiatric and substance use disorders in men and women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60(9):929–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler KS, Gatz M, Gardner C, Pedersen N (2006) A Swedish national twin study of lifetime major depression. Am J Psychother 163(1):109–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler KS, Aggen S, Knudsen GP, Roysamb E, Neale M, Reichborn-Kjennerud T (2010) The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for syndromal and subsyndromal common DSM-IV axis I and all axis II personality disorders. Am J Psych 168(1):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler RC, Andrews G, Mroczek DK, Ustun B, Wittchen H-U (1998) The world health organization composite international diagnostic interview short form (CIDI-SF). Int J Meth Psych Res 7(4):171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler RC, DuPont RL, Berglund P, Wittchen HU (1999) Impairment in pure and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder and major depression at 12 months in two national surveys. Am J Psychother 156(12):1915–1923

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes CLM (1998) Social well-being. Soc Psychol Quart 61(2):121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes CLM (2002) The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. J Health Soc Behav 43(2):207–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes CLM (2005) Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. J Consult Clin Psychol 73(3):539–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes CLM (2007) Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing—A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. Am Psychol 62(2):95–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes CLM, Myers JM, Kendler KS (2010) The structure of the genetic and environmental influences on mental well-being. Am J Public Health 100(12):2379–2384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken D, Tellegen A (1996) Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychol Sci 7(3):186–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken DT, Bouchard TJ Jr, McGue M, Tellegen A (1990) The Minnesota twin family registry: some initial findings. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 39(1):35–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Markon KE, Krueger RF (2004) An empirical comparison of information-theoretic selection criteria for multivariate behavior genetic models. Behav Genet 34(6):593–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mroczek DK, Kolarz CM (1998) The effect of age on positive and negative affect: a developmental perspective on happiness. J Person Soc Psychol 75(5):1333–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neale MC, Eaves LJ, Kendler KS (1994) The power of the classical twin study to resolve variation in threshold traits. Behav Genet 24(3):239–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH (2003) Mx: Statistical Modeling. Dept. of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical School, Richmond

    Google Scholar 

  • Nes RB, Roysamb E, Tambs K, Harris JR, Reichborn-Kjennerud T (2006) Subjective well-being: genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change. Psychol Med 36(7):1033–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nes RB, Czajkowski N, Roysamb E, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Tambs K (2008) Well-being and ill-being: shared environments, shared genes? J Posit Psychol 3(4):253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott CA, Gottesman I (1993) Power limitations in detecting heterogeneity of genetic effects: the case of sex differences in alcoholism. Presented at the annual meeting of the society for research on psychopathology, Chicago, 23–26 October 1993

  • Robitschek C, Keyes CLM (2009) Keyes’s model of mental health with personal growth initiative as a parsimonious predictor. J Couns Psychol 56(2):321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roysamb E, Tambs K, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Neale MC, Harris JR (2003) Happiness and health: environmental and genetic contributions to the relationship between subjective well-being, perceived health, and somatic illness. J Person Soc Psychol 85(6):1136–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff CD, Keyes CL (1995) The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Person Soc Psychol 69(4):719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe JH, Posthuma D, Boomsma DI, de Geus EJ (2005) Heritability of life satisfaction in adults: a twin-family study. Psychol Med 35(11):1581–1588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan PF, Neale MC, Kendler KS (2000) Genetic epidemiology of major depression: review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychother 157(10):1552–1562

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by NIH grant MH068643. The 1995 phase of the study was supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Successful Midlife Development. The 2005 phase was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Aging (P01-AG020166) to conduct a longitudinal follow-up of the MIDUS (Midlife in the USA) investigation.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth S. Kendler.

Additional information

Edited by Michael Lyons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kendler, K.S., Myers, J.M., Maes, H.H. et al. The Relationship Between the Genetic and Environmental Influences on Common Internalizing Psychiatric Disorders and Mental Well-Being. Behav Genet 41, 641–650 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011-9466-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011-9466-1

Keywords

Navigation