Skip to main content
Log in

Endophenotype Approach to Developmental Psychopathology: Implications for Autism Research

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the utility of the endophenotype approach in the study of developmental psychopathology. It is argued that endophenotype research holds considerable promise for the study of gene-brain/cognition-behaviour pathways for developmental disorders. This paper outlines the criteria for determining useful endophenotypes. Possible endophenotypes for autism are discussed as an example of an area where endophenotype research on developmental disorders may be fruitful. It is concluded that although the endophenotype approach holds promise for the study of gene-brain/cognition-behaviour pathways, much work remains to be done in order to validate endophenotype measures. It is also noted that the changing nature of any developmental psychopathology poses a particular challenge to this type of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For simplicity’s sake, in this paper we use the singular term gene when referring to gene-behaviour/gene-psychopathology pathways. We note, however, that it is unlikely that most psychopathologies are associated with just a single gene.

  2. Note that we accept that there may be pre-behavioural phenotypes that are not heritable. However, as our paper largely advocates increasing the understanding of gene-behaviour pathways, demonstrating the involvement of genetic influences is crucial.

  3. It is also reasonable to assume direction of causality from behaviour to endophenotype, especially in the context of developmentally changing constructs. However, this relationship would still be limited by the genetic background of the individual. The genetic background probably influences the range of behaviours and individual engages in. It also limits the range of possible endophenotypes and the developmental change that can result from behaviour-endophenotype interactions.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. (DSM-IV). Washington DC, APA

    Google Scholar 

  • Asherson P, IMAGE Consortium (2004) Eur Child Adolescent Psychiat 13(Suppl 1):I50–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey A et al (1995) Autism as a strongly genetic disorder: evidence from a British twin study. Psychol Med 25:63–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I (2001) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiat Allied Disciplines 42(2):241–251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U (1985) Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"? Cognition 21(1):37–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore S-J, Frith CD (2000) Functional neuroimaging studies of Schizophrenia. In: Mazziotta JC, Toga AW, Frackowiak RSJ (eds) Brain mapping: the disorders. Academic Press

  • Blasi G, Mattay VS, Bertolino, Elvevag AB, Callicott JH, Das S, Kolachana BS, Egan MF, Goldberg TE, Weinberger DR (2005) Effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase val158met genotype on attentional control. J Neurosci: The Official J Soc Neurosci 25(20):5038–5045

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briskman J, Happé F, Frith U (2001) Exploring the cognitive phenotype of autism: weak “central coherence” in parents and siblings of children with autism: II. Real-life skills and preferences. J Child Psychol Psychiat 42(3):309–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruder GE, Keilp JG, Xu H, Shikhman M, Schori E, Gorman JM, Gilliam TC (2005) Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genotypes and working memory: associations with differing cognitive operations. Biol Psychiat 58(11):901–907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnette CP, Mundy PC, Meyer JA, Sutton SK, Vaughan AE, Charak D (2005) Weak central coherence and its relations to theory of mind and anxiety in autism. J Autism Develop Disorders 35(1):63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos FX, Sonuga-Barke EJ, Milham MP, Tannock R (2006) Characterizing cognition in ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction. Trends Cognitive Sci 10(3):117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli F, Frith C, Happe F, Frith U (2002) Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain 125:1839–1849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dapretto M, Davies MS, Pfeifer JH, Scott AA, Sigman M, Bookheimer SY, Iacoboni M (2006) Understanding emotions in others: mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nature Neurosci 9(1):28–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeGeus EJC, Boomsma DI (2001) A genetic neuroscience approach to human cognition. Eur Psychologist 6:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1987) The Intentional Stance. Bradford Books, MIT Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombonne E (2005) Epidemiology of autistic disorder and other pervasive developmental disorders. J Clin Psychiat 66(Suppl 10):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith U, Frith CD (2003) Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Phil Trans Roy Soc London. Series B, Biol Sci 358:459–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith U (2003) Autism: explaining the enigma. Blackwell

  • Frith CD, Frith U (2006) The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50(4):531–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottesman II, Gould TD (2003) The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiat 160(4):636–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottesman II, Shields J (1972) Schizophrenia and genetics: a twin vantage point. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Happé F, Briskman J, Frith U (2001) Exploring the cognitive phenotype of autism: weak "central coherence" in parents and siblings of children with autism: I. Experimental tests. J Child Psychol Psychiat 42(3):299–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happé F (1999) Autism: cognitive deficit or cognitive style? Trends in Cognitive Sci 3(6):216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happe F, Frith U (2006) The weak coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Develop Disorders 36(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hariri AR, Mattay VS, Tessitore A, Kolachana B, Fera F, Goldman D, Egan MF, Weinberger DR (2002) Serotonin transporter genetic variation and the response of the human amygdala. Science 297:400–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hariri AR, Weinberger DR (2003) Imaging genomics. Brit Med Bull 65:259–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C, Adlam A, Happe F, Jackson J, Taylor A, Caspi A (2000) Good test–retest reliability for standard and advanced false-belief tasks across a wide range of abilities. J Child Psychol Psychiat 41(4):483–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C, Jaffee SR, Happe F, Taylor A, Caspi A, Moffitt TE (2005) Origins of individual differences in theory of mind: from nature to nurture? Child Develop 76(2):356–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram JL, Stodgell CJ, Hyman SL, Figlewicz DA, Weitkamp LR, Rodier PM (2000) Discovery of allelic variants of HOXA1 and HOXB1: genetic susceptibility to autism spectrum disorders. Teratology 62(6):393–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe T, Baron-Cohen S (1999) A test of central coherence theory: linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome: is local coherence impaired? Cognition 71(2):149–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph RM, Tager-Flusberg H (2004) The relationship of theory of mind and executive functions to symptom type and severity in children with autism. Develop Psychopathol 16(1):137–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klin A, Jones W, Schultz R, Volkmar F, Cohen D (2002a) Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives General Psychiat 59(9):809–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klin A, Jones W, Schultz R, Volkmar F, Cohen D (2002b) Defining and quantifying the social phenotype in autism. Am J Psychiat 159(6):895–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuntsi J, Andreou P, Ma J, Borger NA, van den Meere J (2005) Testing assumptions for endophenotype studies in ADHD: Reliability and validity of tasks in a general population sample. BioMed Central Psychiat 5:40

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb JA, Moore J, Bailey A, Monaco AP (2000) Autism: recent molecular genetic advances. Human Mol Genet 9(6):861–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb JA, Parr JR, Bailey AJ, Monaco AP (2002). Autism: in search of susceptibility genes. Neuromol Med 2(1):11–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez B, Leekam SR (2003) Do children with autism fail to process information in context? J Child Psychol Psychiat Allied Disciplines 44(2):285–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattay VS, Goldberg TE, Fera F, Hariri AR, Tessitore A, Egan MF, Kolachana B, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR (2003) Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100:6186–6191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Lindenberg A, Buckholtz JW, Kolachana B, Hariri AR, Pezawas L, Blasi G, Wabnitz A, Honea R, Verchinski B, Callicott JH, Egan M, Mattay V, Weinberger DR (2006a) Neural mechanisms of genetic risk for impulsivity and violence in humans. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103(16):6269–6274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Lindenberg A, Mervis CB, Faith Berman K (2006b) Neural mechanisms in Williams syndrome: a unique window to genetic influences on cognition and behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7:380–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Rutter M (2005) Strategy for investigating interactions between measured genes and measured environments. Archives General Psychiat 62(5):473–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morton J (2004) Developmental disorders: a causal modelling approach. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnishi T, Hashimoto R, Mori T, Nemoto K, Moriguchi Y, Iida H, Noguchi H, Nakabayashi T, Hori H, Ohmori M, Tsukue R, Anami K, Hirabayashi N, Harada S, Arima K, Saitoh O, Kunugi H (2006) The association between the Val158Met polymorphism of the catechol-O-methyl transferase gene and morphological abnormalities of the brain in chronic schizophrenia. Brain 129(Pt 2):399–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellicano E, Maybery M, Durkin K, Maley A (2006) Multiple cognitive capabilities/deficits in children with an autism spectrum disorder: “weak” central coherence and its relationship to theory of mind and executive control. Develop psychopathol 18(1):77–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin R, Owen MJ, McGuffin P (1994) The genetic basis of complex human behaviors. Science 264:1733–1739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin R (2005). Finding genes in child psychology and psychiatry: when are we going to be there? J Child Psychol Psychiat 46(10):1030–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Premack, Woodruff (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci 1:515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roffman JL, Weiss AP, Goff DC, Rauch SL, Weinberger DR (2006) Neuroimaging-genetic paradigms: a new approach to investigate the pathophysiology and treatment of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Harvard Rev Psychiat 14(2):78–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronald A, Happe F, Plomin R (2005) The genetic relationship between individual differences in social and nonsocial behaviours characteristic of autism. Develop Sci 8:444–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter M, Genetic studies of autism: from the 1970s into the millennium. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2000 28(1):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg H, Sullivan K (1994) A second look at second-order belief attribution in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 24(5):577–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tunbridge EM, Harrison PJ, Weinberger DR (2006). Catechol-o-Methyltransferase, Cognition, and Psychosis: Val(158)Met and Beyond. Biol Psychiatry 60(2):141–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JH, Waiter GD, Gilchrist A, Perrett DI, Murray AD, Whiten A (2006) Neural mechanisms of imitation and ‘mirror neuron’ functioning in autistic spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia 44(4):610–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer H, Perner J (1983) Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 13(1):103–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wing L, Potter D (2002) The epidemiology of autistic spectrum disorders: Is the Prevalence rising? Mental Retardation Develop Disabilities Res Rev 8(3):151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing L (1996) Autistic spectrum disorders. Brit Med J 312:327–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yirmiya N, Shulman C (1996) Seriation, conservation, and theory of mind abilities in individuals with autism, individuals with mental retardation, and normally developing children. Child Develop 67(5):2045–2059

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Essi Viding.

Additional information

Edited by Gene Fisch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viding, E., Blakemore, SJ. Endophenotype Approach to Developmental Psychopathology: Implications for Autism Research. Behav Genet 37, 51–60 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-006-9105-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-006-9105-4

Keywords

Navigation