Skip to main content
Log in

Heterosexual Women’s Causal Attributions Regarding Impairment in Sexual Function: Factor Structure and Associations with Well-Being

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theory and interventions for female sexual dysfunction typically emphasize the role of cognitions, including the perceived causes of impaired sexual function (causal attributions). Although causal attributions have been extensively studied in the context of mood disorders and relational distress, research in the area of sexual dysfunction has been limited. The current study explored the factor structure of women’s causal attributions regarding their impaired sexual function and the association between these attributions and multiple indicators of subjective well-being. Women in heterosexual relationships reporting current impairments in sexual function (N = 147) completed self-report scales assessing 13 distinct causal attributions, sexual function, and subjective well-being. Results suggested moderately reliable patterns of attributions regarding responsibility (e.g., self vs. partner), specificity to sexual activity, and the degree to which women could effectively address the causes of their difficulties. Beliefs that impaired sexual function was the fault of one’s self or one’s partner, caused by wider issues in the relationship, and difficult to effectively address were generally associated with lower well-being over and above severity of functional impairment. These findings support multiple theories of sexual dysfunction, and highlight the potential importance of cognitive factors in understanding and treating female sexual dysfunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96, 358–372. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Whitehouse, W. G., Hogan, M. E., Panzarella, C., & Rose, D. T. (2006). Prospective incidence of first onsets and recurrences of depression in individuals at high and low cognitive risk for depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 145–156. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.115.1.145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B. L. (1981). A comparison of systematic desensitization and directed masturbation in the treatment of primary orgasmic dysfunction in females. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 568–570. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.49.4.568.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Atlantis, E., & Sullivan, T. (2012). Bidirectional association between depression and sexual dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 1497–1507. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02709.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J., Loftus, J., & Long, J. S. (2003). Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 193–208. doi:10.1023/A:1023420431760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H. (1986). Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 140–148. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.54.2.140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1987). Cognitive models of depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1, 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S. (1995). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binik, Y. M., Reissing, E., Pukall, C., Flory, N., Payne, K. A., & Khalifé, S. (2002). The female sexual pain disorders: Genital pain or sexual dysfunction? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 425–429. doi:10.1023/A:1019892125163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 613–628. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brotto, L. A., Heiman, J. R., Goff, B., Greer, B., Lentz, G. M., Swisher, E., … Van Blaricom, A. (2008). A psychoeducational intervention for sexual dysfunction in women with gynecologic cancer. Archives of Sexual Behavior37, 317–329. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9196-x.

  • Brotto, L., & Luria, M. (2014). Sexual interest/arousal disorder in women. In Y. M. Binik & K. K. Hall (Eds.), Principles and practice of sex therapy (5th ed., pp. 17–41). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17–31. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A., & Turner, J. J. (1993). Models of cognitive mediation and moderation in child depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 271–281. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.102.2.271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durtschi, J. A., Fincham, F. D., Cui, M., Lorenz, F. O., & Conger, R. D. (2011). Dyadic processes in early marriage: Attributions, behavior, and marital quality. Family Relations, 60, 421–434. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00655.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fichten, C. S., Spector, I., & Libman, E. (1988). Client attributions for sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 14, 208–224. doi:10.1080/00926238808403919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: The relationship attribution measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 457–468. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572–583. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. D., Bennet, C., Fairley, C., & Dennerstein, L. (2006). What can prevalence studies tell us about female sexual difficulty and dysfunction? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 3, 589–595. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00241.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. D., Dennerstein, L., Bennett, C. M., Sidat, M., Gurrin, L. C., & Fairley, C. K. (2008). Risk factors for female sexual dysfunction in the general population: Exploring factors associated with low sexual function and sexual distress. Journal Of Sexual Medicine, 5, 1681–1693. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00838.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J. R. (2002). Psychologic treatments for female sexual dysfunction: Are they effective and do we need them? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 445–450. doi:10.1023/A:1019848310142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jodoin, M., Bergeron, S., Khalifé, S., Dupuis, M., Desrochers, G., & Leclerc, B. (2011). Attributions about pain as predictors of psychological symptomatology, sexual function, and dyadic adjustment in women with vestibulodynia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 87–97. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9647-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima, A., Ito, K., Sugawara, M., Sakai, A., Sugawara, K., & Kitamura, T. (2008). Characteristics of the Relationship Attribution Measure (RAM) with Japanese middle-aged couples. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 79, 365–371. doi:10.4992/jjpsy.79.365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1–27. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, J. F., & Eley, T. C. (2008). Attributional style as a risk marker of genetic effects for adolescent depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 849–859. doi:10.1037/a0013943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Palik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 537–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage & Family Living, 21, 251–255. doi:10.2307/348022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loose, V. E., Bridges, C. F., & Critelli, J. W. (1987). Weiner’s attribution theory and female orgasmic consistency. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 348–361. doi:10.1080/00224498709551372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., & Brent Donnellan, M. (2012). Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from four national panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 105, 323–331. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9783-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, M. P. (2001). Evaluation of a cognitive behavior therapy program for people with sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 27, 259–271. doi:10.1080/009262301750257119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meana, M., Binik, Y. M., Khalife, S., & Cohen, D. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of pain attributions in women with dyspareunia. Psychosomatics, 40, 497–502. doi:10.1016/S0033-318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. (2003). Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic disorder and in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 29, 39–46. doi:10.1080/713847100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C., & Trapnell, P. (2005). Development and validation of a five-factor sexual satisfaction and distress scale for women: The Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W). Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2, 66–81. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20107.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Metalsky, G. I., Halberstadt, L. J., & Abramson, L. Y. (1987). Vulnerability to depressive mood reactions: Toward a more powerful test of the diathesis–stress and causal mediation components of the reformulated theory of depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 386–393. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., & Dolezal, C. (2007). The Female Sexual Function Index: A methodological critique and suggestions for improvement. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 33, 217–224. doi:10.1080/00926230701267852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. E., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). Refining the association between attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 196–208. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.9.2.196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. R., King, M., Nazareth, I., & Wellings, K. (2011). Managing sexual difficulties: A qualitative investigation of coping strategies. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 325–333. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.494332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre, P. J., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2009). Questionnaire of cognitive schema activation in sexual context: A measure to assess cognitive schemas activated in unsuccessful sexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 425–437. doi:10.1080/00224490902792616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre, P. J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Gomes, F. A. (2006). Prevalence and comorbidity of sexual dysfunctions in a Portuguese clinical sample. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 32, 173–182. doi:10.1080/00926230500442334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donohue, W., Dopke, C. A., & Swingen, D. N. (1997). Psychotherapy for female sexual dysfunction: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 537–566. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00013-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regev, L., & Schmidt, J. (2008). Sensate focus. In W. T. O’Donohue, J. E. Fisher, W. T. O’Donohue, & J. E. Fisher (Eds.), Cognitive behavior therapy: Applying empirically supported techniques in your practice (2nd ed., pp. 486–492). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., Shabsigh, R., … D’Agostino, R. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208. doi:10.1080/009262300278597.

  • Scepkowski, L. A., Wiegel, M., Bach, A. K., Weisberg, R. B., Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (2004). Attributions for sexual situations in men with and without erectile disorder: Evidence from a sex-specific attributional style measure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 559–569. doi:10.1023/B:ASEB.0000044740.72588.08.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiloh, S., Rashuk-Rosenthal, D., & Yael, B. (2002). Illness causal attributions: An exploratory study of their structure and associations with other illness cognitions and perceptions of control. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 373–394. doi:10.1023/A:1015818532390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simkins-Bullock, J., Wildman, B. G., Bullock, W. A., & Sugrue, D. P. (1992). Etiological attributions, responsibility attributions, and marital adjustment in erectile dysfunction patients. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 18, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, K. E., & Meana, M. (2010). Why did passion wane? A qualitative study of married women’s attributions for declines in sexual desire. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 36, 360–380. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.498727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, K. R., & Meston, C. M. (2010). Differentiating components of sexual well-being in women: Are sexual satisfaction and sexual distress independent constructs? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 2458–2468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, K. R., & Meston, C. M. (2012). The young and the restless? Age as a moderator of the association between sexual desire and sexual distress in women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 38, 464–476. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2011.613096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, K. R., & Meston, C. M. (2015a). The conditional importance of sex: Exploring the association between sexual well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41, 25–38. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2013.811450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, K. R., & Meston, C. M. (2015b). Why is impaired sexual function distressing for women? The primacy of pleasure in female sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 728–737. doi:10.1111/jsm.12804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, K. R., Pulverman, C., & Meston, C. M. (2014). Assessing the association between childhood sexual abuse and adult sexual experiences in women with sexual difficulties. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 27, 274–282. doi:10.1002/jts.21923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, K. R., Toorabally, N., Lyons, L., & Meston, C.M. (in press). Further validation of the Female Sexual Function Index: Specificity and associations with clinical interview data. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy.

  • ter Kuile, M. M., Both, S., & van Lankveld, J. M. (2010). Cognitive behavioral therapy for sexual dysfunctions in women. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 33, 595–610. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2010.04.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trudel, G., Marchand, A., Ravart, M., Aubin, S., Turgeon, L., & Fortier, P. (2001). The effect of a cognitive-behavioral group treatment program on hypoactive sexual desire in women. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 16, 145–164. doi:10.1080/14681990120040078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, E., & Ogden, J. (2010). Experiencing vaginismus—Sufferers’ beliefs about causes and effects. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 434–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. B., Brown, T. A., Wincze, J. P., & Barlow, D. H. (2001). Causal attributions and male sexual arousal: The impact of attributions for a bogus erectile difficulty on sexual arousal, cognitions, and affect. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 324–334. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.110.2.324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. L., & Perry, B. A. (1979). Assessment and treatment of marital dysfunction. Eugene, OR: Oregon Marital Studies Program.

  • Wiegel, M., Meston, C., & Rosen, R. (2005). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): Cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31, 1–20. doi:10.1080/00926230590475206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegel, M., Scekowski, L. A., & Barlow, D. H. (2005). Cognitive and affective processes in female sexual dysfunctions. In I. Goldstein, C. M. Meston, S. L. Davis, & A. M. Traish (Eds.), Women’s sexual function and dysfunction: Study, diagnosis, and treatment (pp. 85–92). New York: Informa Healthcare.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyle R. Stephenson.

Appendix: The Sexual Dysfunction Attributions Scale

Appendix: The Sexual Dysfunction Attributions Scale

For the following scale, we are defining sexual difficulties as problems you have experienced with sexual functioning. Sexual functioning has four primary areas:

Sexual desire: a feeling that includes wanting to have a sexual experience, feeling receptive to a partner’s sexual initiation, and thinking or fantasizing about sex.

Sample difficulty: feeling low or no desire to engage in sexual activity

Sexual arousal: a feeling that includes both physical and mental aspects of sexual excitement. It may include feelings or warmth or tingling in the genitals, or vaginal lubrication. It may also include feeling “into it “or “turned on” during sexual activity.

Sample difficulty: a lack of genital lubrication, or, not feeling turned on during sex.

Orgasm: the frequency and ease with which you experience climax or orgasm during sexual activity

Sample difficulty: lack of orgasm, or taking too long to climax

Sexual pain: pain or discomfort during sexual activity.

Sample difficulty: a sharp pain felt during vaginal penetration.

While many women are bothered by issues not included in the list above, we would like you to focus on difficulties in these four areas when answering the following questions.

Sexual difficulties can be caused by many factors related to the individual, the relationship, external concerns (work, children, etc.), or the wider culture. While it is usually difficult to identify one specific cause of a sexual difficulty, most people have an opinion as to what causes their sexual difficulties. Please answer the questions below regarding what you see as causing your sexual difficulties. These responses will be based on your opinion only; there are no right or wrong answers.

Anchor points are specified below each item.

1. Something about me physically causes my sexual difficulties (e.g., my own physical/medical issues).

1 – Strongly disagree

6 – Strongly agree

2. Something about me personally causes my sexual difficulties (e.g., the type of person I am, the mood I am in).

1 – Strongly disagree

6 – Strongly agree

3. Something about my partner causes my sexual difficulties (e.g., the type of person he/she is, the mood he/she is in, his/her physical/medical issues).

1 – Strongly disagree

6 – Strongly agree

4. Outside circumstances cause my sexual difficulties (e.g., lack of privacy, social pressures).

1 – Strongly disagree

6 – Strongly agree

5. The cause of my sexual difficulties is specific to sexual activity.

1 – Strongly disagree

6 – Strongly agree

6. The cause of my sexual difficulties affects many areas of my relationship.

1 – Strongly disagree

6 – Strongly agree

7. How stable are the causes of your sexual difficulties?

1 – Causes will never again be present

6 – Causes will always be present

8. To what extent do you have control over the causes of your sexual difficulties?

1 – I have no control

6 – I have complete control

9. To what extent does your partner have control over the causes of your sexual difficulties?

1 – He/she has no control

6 – He/she has complete control

10. To what extent does your partner purposefully affect your sexual functioning?

1 – Not at all

6 – Very much

11. Is your partner’s intent generally positive (he/she trying to help) or negative (he/she trying to be detrimental)?

1 – Negative

6 – Positive

12. Does your partner deserve to be blamed for your sexual difficulties?

1 – Deserves no blame

6 – Deserves all blame

13. Do you deserve to be blamed for your sexual difficulties?

1 – Deserve no blame

6 – Deserve all blame

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stephenson, K.R., Meston, C.M. Heterosexual Women’s Causal Attributions Regarding Impairment in Sexual Function: Factor Structure and Associations with Well-Being. Arch Sex Behav 45, 1989–2001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0741-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0741-3

Keywords

Navigation