Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Gendered Friendship Patterns on the Prevalence of Homophobia Among Belgian Late Adolescents

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to assess the determinants of homophobia among Belgian adolescents, a shortened version of the Homophobia scale (Wright et al., 1999) was included in a representative survey among Belgian adolescents (n = 4,870). Principal component analysis demonstrated that the scale was one-dimensional and internally coherent. The results showed that homophobia is still widespread among Belgian adolescents, despite various legal reforms in the country aiming to combat discrimination of gay women and men. A multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that boys, ethnic minorities, individuals with high levels of ethnocentrism and an instrumental worldview, Muslim minorities, and those with low levels of associational involvement scored significantly higher on the scale. While among boys an extensive friendship network was associated with higher levels of homophobia, the opposite phenomenon was found among girls. We discuss the possible relation between notions of masculinity within predominantly male adolescent friendship networks and social support for homophobia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altemeyer, R. (2006). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, R., & Fetner, T. (2008). Cohort differences in tolerance of homosexuality: Attitudinal change in Canada and the United States, 1981–2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, J., Struckman-Johnson, C., Quevillon, R., & Banka, S. (2008). Heterosexual men’s attitudes toward gay men: A hierarchical model including masculinity, openness, and theoretical explanations. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 9, 154–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauermeister, J. A., Morales, M. M., González-Rivera, M., & Seda, G. (2007). Sexual prejudice among Puerto Rican young adults. Journal of Homosexuality, 53, 135–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bereket, T., & Adam, B. (2008). Navigating Islam and same-sex liaisons among men in Turkey. Journal of Homosexuality, 55, 204–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernat, J., Calhoun, K., Adams, H., & Zeichner, A. (2001). Homophobia and physical aggression toward homosexual and heterosexual individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 179–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. (1998). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. (2009). Sexual prejudice. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice (pp. 439–465). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G., & González-Rivera, M. (2006). Attitudes toward homosexuality among U.S. residents of Mexican descent. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 122–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hesp, G., & Brooks, J. (2009). Heterosexism and homophobia on fraternity row: A case study of a college fraternity community. Journal of LGBT Youth, 6, 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M. (2003). Value congruence and convergence within voluntary associations. Political Behavior, 25, 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., Claes, E., Harell, E., Quintelier, E., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2010). Anti-gay sentiment among adolescents in Belgium and Canada: A comparative investigation into the role of gender and religion. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 384–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., Quintelier, E., Claes, E., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2009). Technical report for the Belgian Political Panel Survey (BPPS). Leuven: University of Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, E., Lubbers, M., & de Graaf, N. D. (2007). ‘Horrors of Holland’: Explaining attitude change towards euthanasia and homosexuals in the Netherlands, 1970–1998. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 451–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, R., Au, K., Chan, W., Cheung, L., Lam, C., Liu, H., et al. (2009). Homophobia in medical students of the University of Hong Kong. Sex Education, 9, 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. (1993). Fundamentalism, Christian orthodoxy, and intrinsic religious orientation as predictors of discriminatory attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32, 256–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M., & Whitley, B. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreager, D. (2007). Unnecessary roughness? School sports, peer networks, and male adolescent violence. American Sociological Review, 72, 705–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R., & Steinberg, L. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A., & White, J. (2009). The defense mechanisms of homophobic adolescent males. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 435–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lingiardi, V., Falanga, S., & D’Augelli, A. (2005). The evaluation of homophobia in an Italian sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 81–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, J. (2001). America’s liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973–1998. American Sociological Review, 66, 762–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louderback, J., & Whitley, B. (1997). Perceived erotic value of homosexuality and sex-role attitudes as mediators of sex differences in heterosexual college students’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, A., & Kehily, M. J. (1996). Playing it straight: Masculinities, homophobias and schooling. Journal of Gender Studies, 5, 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oransky, M., & Marecek, J. (2009). I’m not going to be a girl. Masculinity and emotions in boys’ friendships and peer groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 218–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2005). ‘Dude, you’re a fag’: Adolescent masculinity and the fag discourse. Sexualities, 8, 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, L., & Hooghe, M. (2003). The swing of the pendulum: The detraditionalisation of the regulation of sexuality and intimacy in Belgium (1973–2003). International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 31, 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Štulhofer, A., & Rimac, I. (2009). Determinants of homonegativity in Europe. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 24–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A meta-analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S., Webster, B., & Cheung, P. (2008). Measuring Hong Kong undergraduate students’ attitudes towards transpeople. Sex Roles, 59, 670–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L. W., Adams, H. E., & Bernat, J. (1999). Development and validation of the Homophobia scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Hooghe.

Appendix: Variables Included in the Multivariate Model

Appendix: Variables Included in the Multivariate Model

Gender

Boys = 0, Girls = 1

Boys: 50.1% (n = 2429), girls: 49.9% (n = 2417). Missing information: 24

Religious denomination

Dummy variables 1 = yes

24.6% non religious; 63.8% Catholic; 5.2% Muslim; 1.4% Protestant; 1.0% Orthodox Christian

Importance of Religion

How Important is Religion for You? (0–10 scale)

Mean: 3.57 (SD 3.10)

Associational Involvement

Membership of 16 different associations (0 = no, 1 = yes)

Mean: 1.55 memberships. Most frequently mentioned: Sports (42%), Music and culture (23%), Youth Associations (21%)

Number of Friends

How many good friends do you have? 7 categories, 0 to 15+

Average: 3.72 (SD 1.40). Average boys: 3.95 (SD 1.51); Average girls: 3.50 (SD 1.24)

Well-Being at School

Subjective Well-Being at School. 4 Likert Items. Strongest Item: “Other pupils in class take my feelings into consideration” (factor load .86)

Four items are one-dimensional: Eigenvalue 2.78, 69.5% explained variance. Cronbach’s alpha for four item: .85

News Broadcasts

Interest in News Broadcasts: Scale from 1 = Never to 5 = Every Day

Average 3.79 (SD 1.05)

Educational Goal

What do You think Will be Your final Educational Goal?

Not finish High School (5.4%); Finish High School (26.2%); Some college (47.0%) University (21.4%)

Education Mother

Educational Level of Your Mother: 1: Lower Secondary to 4: University

Average: 2.52 (SD 0.99)

Education Father

Educational Level of Your Father: 1: Lower Secondary to 4: University

Average: 2.59 (SD 1.10)

Books at Home

Number of books at home: 1: no books to 7: more than 500

Average: 4.06 (SD 1.59)

Postmaterialism

Preference for Postmaterialist Items: Freedom of Expression More Important than Law and Order, range 0–2

Average: 0.75 (SD 0.53)

Ethnocentrism

Hostile Attitude toward Ethnic Minorities. Three Items, Strongest Item: “Belgium has become a Worse Place to Live in because of the Presence of Migrants from Other Countries” (factor load .89)

Three items are one-dimensional: Eigenvalue 2.30, 76.8% explained variance. Cronbach’s alpha for three items: .85

Generalized Trust

Do You Think Most People can be Trusted (2 items, 0–10 scales)

Average: 8.63 (SD 3.59)

Instrumentalism

Instrumental Conception of Society: Six Items, Strongest Item: “You have to take of yourself, and not bother about others” (factor load .84)

Six items are one-dimensional: Eigenvalue 3.52, 58.7% explained variance. Cronbach’s alpha for six items: .86

Citizenship Status

Do you have Belgian citizenship status?

No: 4.7%; Yes: 95.3%

Born outside Belgium

Are you born outside Belgium? (added: Netherlands, France, Germany, Luxembourg)

No: 94.3%; Yes: 5.7%

Parents born outside Belgium

Is one of your parents born outside Belgium? (and neighboring countries)

No: 81.3%; one parent: 8.5%; both parents 10.2%

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hooghe, M. The Impact of Gendered Friendship Patterns on the Prevalence of Homophobia Among Belgian Late Adolescents. Arch Sex Behav 40, 543–550 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9635-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9635-y

Keywords

Navigation