Abstract
Leonard Bickman’s article on the future of artificial intelligence (AI) in psychotherapy research paints an encouraging picture of the progress to be made in this field. We support his perspective, but we also offer some cautionary notes about the boost AI can provide. We suggest that AI is not likely to transform psychotherapy research or practice to the degree seen in pharmacology and medicine because the factors that contribute to treatment response in these realms differ so markedly from one another, and in ways that do not favor advances in psychotherapy. Despite this limitation, it seems likely that AI will have a beneficial impact, improving empirical analysis through data-driven model development, tools for addressing the limitations of traditional regression methods, and novel means of personalizing treatment. In addition, AI has the potential to augment the reach of the researcher and therapist by expanding our ability to gather data and deliver interventions beyond the confines of the lab or clinical office.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, G., Basu, A., Cuijpers, P., Craske, M. G., McEvoy, P., English, C. L., et al. (2018). Computer therapy for the anxiety and depression disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders,55, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.01.001.
Chung, Y., Addington, J., Bearden, C. E., Cadenhead, K., Cornblatt, B., Mathalon, D. H., … Walker, E. (2018). Use of machine learning to determine deviance in neuroanatomical maturity associated with future psychosis in youths at clinically high risk. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(9), 960–968. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1543.
DeRubeis, R. J. (2019). The history, current status, and possible future of precision mental health. Behaviour Research and Therapy,123, 103506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103506.
DeRubeis, R. J., Cohen, Z. D., Forand, N. R., Fournier, J. C., Gelfand, L. A., & Lorenzo-Luaces, L. (2014). The personalized advantage index: Translating research on prediction into individualized treatment recommendation. A demonstration. PLoS ONE,9(1), e83875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083875.
Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health,4(2), e19. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7785.
Gunduz, N., & Fokoué, E. (2015). Robust classification of high dimension low sample size data. http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.00592.
Kleiman, E. M., Turner, B. J., Fedor, S., Beale, E. E., Huffman, J. C., & Nock, M. K. (2017). Examination of real-time fluctuations in suicidal ideation and its risk factors: Results from two ecological momentary assessment studies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,126(6), 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000273.
Lorenzo-Luaces, L., DeRubeis, R., Van Straten, A., & Tiemens, B. (2017). A prognostic index (PI) as a moderator of outcomes in the treatment of depression: A proof of concept combining multiple variables to inform risk-stratified stepped care models. Journal of Affective Disorders,213, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.010.
Ng, M. Y., & Weisz, J. R. (2016). Building a science of personalized intervention for youth mental health. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,57(3), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12470.
Schleider, J. L., & Weisz, J. R. (2017). Little treatments, promising effects: Meta-analysis of single-session interventions for youth psychiatric problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,56, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.11.007.
van Bronswijk, S. C., DeRubeis, R. J., Lemmens, L. H., Peeters, F. P., Keefe, J. R., Cohen, Z. D., et al. (2019). Precision medicine for long-term depression outcomes using the personalized advantage index approach: Cognitive therapy or interpersonal psychotherapy? Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719003192.
Weisz, J. R., Kuppens, S., Ng, M. Y., Vaughn-Coaxum, R. A., Ugueto, A. M., Eckshtain, D., et al. (2019). Are psychotherapies for young people growing stronger? Tracking trends over time for youth anxiety, depression, ADHD, and conduct problems. Perspectives on Psychological Science,14(2), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/174569161880543.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Festschrift for Leonard Bickman Special Issue on The Future of Children's Mental Health Services.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horn, R.L., Weisz, J.R. Can Artificial Intelligence Improve Psychotherapy Research and Practice?. Adm Policy Ment Health 47, 852–855 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01056-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01056-9