Skip to main content
Log in

Therapist-Observer Concordance in Ratings of EBP Strategy Delivery: Challenges and Targeted Directions in Pursuing Pragmatic Measurement in Children’s Mental Health Services

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pragmatic measures of therapist delivery of evidence-based practice (EBP) are critical to assessing the impact of large-scale, multiple EBP implementation efforts. As an initial step in the development of pragmatic measurement, the current study examined the concordance between therapist and observer ratings of items assessing delivery of EBP strategies considered essential for common child EBP targets. Possible EBP-, session-, and therapist-levels factors associated with concordance were also explored. Therapists and independent observers rated the extensiveness of therapist (n = 103) EBP strategy delivery in 680 community psychotherapy sessions in which six EBPs were used. Concordance between therapist- and observer-report of the extensiveness of therapist EBP strategy use was at least fair (ICC ≥ .40) for approximately half of the items. Greater therapist-observer concordance was observed in sessions where a structured EBP was delivered and in sessions where therapists reported being able to carry out planned activities. Findings highlighted conditions that may improve or hinder therapists’ ability to report on their own EBP strategy delivery in a way that is consistent with independent observers. These results can help inform the development of pragmatic therapist-report measures of EBP strategy delivery and implementation efforts more broadly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the term “EBPs” throughout, inclusive of MAP, for ease of communication. We acknowledge that MAP differs from the other EBPs as it is an evidence management system, with a direct service component that coordinates multiple evidence sources, employs practices components drawn from over 700 evidence based treatments, and offers structured process management supports to guide clinical care for anxiety, trauma, depression, conduct problems in children 0–21 years old. In the LACDMH system, the MAP direct service model complements a diverse array of EBPs by allowing providers to select, review, adapt, or construct promising treatments as needed to match particular child characteristics based on the latest scientific findings (see Chorpita and Daleiden 2018).

References

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH100134).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole A. Stadnick.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Ann Garland is a co-author on this manuscript and an Associate Editor of Administration and Policy in Mental Health Services Research. Dr. Garland will not be involved in the review of this submission. The authors declare that they have no other conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study that involved human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Boards at the participating academic institutions and practice organizations, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 847 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brookman-Frazee, L., Stadnick, N.A., Lind, T. et al. Therapist-Observer Concordance in Ratings of EBP Strategy Delivery: Challenges and Targeted Directions in Pursuing Pragmatic Measurement in Children’s Mental Health Services. Adm Policy Ment Health 48, 155–170 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01054-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01054-x

Keywords

Navigation