Abstract
Receiving an HIV-positive test result is associated with reduced condomless anal sex (CAS), but little is known about negative test results. The recent development of the Inventory of Reactions to Testing HIV Negative confirmed that there are diverse reactions to receiving a negative test result, which have implications for risk behaviour. The goals of the current study were to validate the measure in a sample of young men who have sex with men who recently tested HIV-negative (N = 1113) and to examine its associations with CAS. Factor analysis identified four factors, three of which were the same as the original factors (Reinforced Safety, Luck, and Invulnerability) and one that was novel (Reinforced Risk). Construct validity was demonstrated with associations between subscales and constructs from the IMB model of HIV prevention. Lower Reinforced Safety and higher Luck and Reinforced Risk were associated with more CAS. Associations between Reinforced Safety and Luck with CAS were stronger for those who reported more lifetime HIV tests. Findings highlight the importance of reactions to testing HIV-negative and suggest that they become more important with repeated testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CDC. HIV surveillance report, 2011. Atlanta: Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013.
CDC. HIV among gay and bisexual men. CDC National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention; 2015.
Weinhardt LS, Carey MP, Johnson BT, Bickham NL. Effects of HIV counseling and testing on sexual risk behavior: a meta-analytic review of published research, 1985–1997. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1397–405.
Turner AN, Miller WC, Padian NS, Kaufman JS, Behets FM, Chipato T, et al. Unprotected sex following HIV testing among women in Uganda and Zimbabwe: short- and long-term comparisons with pre-test behaviour. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(4):997–1007.
Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen RS. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39(4):446–53.
Denison JA, O’Reilly KR, Schmid GP, Kennedy CE, Sweat MD. HIV voluntary counseling and testing and behavioral risk reduction in developing countries: a meta-analysis, 1990–2005. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(3):363–73.
Sherr L, Lopman B, Kakowa M, Dube S, Chawira G, Nyamukapa C, et al. Voluntary counselling and testing: uptake, impact on sexual behaviour, and HIV incidence in a rural Zimbabwean cohort. AIDS. 2007;21(7):851–60.
Rosenberg NE, Pettifor AE, De Bruyn G, Westreich D, Delany-Moretlwe S, Behets F, et al. HIV testing and counseling leads to immediate consistent condom use among South African stable HIV-discordant couples. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62(2):226–33.
Perry SW, Jacobsberg LB, Fishman B, Weiler PH, Gold JW, Frances AJ. Psychological responses to serological testing for HIV. AIDS. 1990;4(2):145–52.
Moulton JM, Stempel RR, Bacchetti P, Temoshok L, Moss AR. Results of a one year longitudinal study of HIV antibody test notification from the San Francisco general hospital cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1991;4(8):787–94.
Otten MW Jr, Zaidi AA, Wroten JE, Witte JJ, Peterman TA. Changes in sexually transmitted disease rates after HIV testing and posttest counseling, Miami, 1988–1989. Am J Public Health. 1993;83(4):529–33.
Leaity S, Sherr L, Wells H, Evans A, Miller R, Johnson M, et al. Repeat HIV testing: high-risk behaviour or risk reduction strategy? AIDS. 2000;14(5):547–52.
Norton J, Elford J, Sherr L, Miller R, Johnson MA. Repeat HIV testers at a London same-day testing clinic. AIDS. 1997;11(6):773–81.
MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA, Secura GM, Bartholow BN, McFarland W, Shehan D, et al. Repeat HIV testing, risk behaviors, and HIV seroconversion among young men who have sex with men: a call to monitor and improve the practice of prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;29(1):76–85.
Helleringer S, Reniers G. Study designs fail to represent the intricate effects of HIV testing and counselling on condom use and HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(1):255–6.
Mustanski B, Rendina HJ, Greene GJ, Sullivan PS, Parsons JT. Testing negative means I’m lucky, making good choices, or immune: diverse reactions to HIV test results are associated with risk behaviors. Ann Behav Med. 2014;48(3):371–83.
Fisher WA, Fisher JD, Harman J. The information-motivation-behavioral skills model: a general social psychological approach to understanding and promoting health behavior. Soc Psychol Found Health Illn. 2003;13(1):82–106.
Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, Lyss SB, et al. (2006) Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep.;55(RR-14):1-17; quiz CE1-4.
Carey MP, Schroder KE. Development and psychometric evaluation of the brief HIV Knowledge Questionnaire. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14(2):172–82.
Mustanski B, Garofalo R, Monahan C, Gratzer B, Andrews R. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an online HIV prevention program for diverse young men who have sex with men: the keep it up! intervention. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(9):2999–3012.
Carey MP, Morrison-Beedy D, Johnson BT. The HIV-knowledge questionnaire: development and evaluation of a reliable, valid, and practical self-administered questionnaire. AIDS Behav. 1997;1(1):61–74.
Kalichman SC, Picciano JF, Roffman RA. Motivation to reduce HIV risk behaviors in the context of the information, motivation and behavioral skills (IMB) model of HIV prevention. J Health Psychol. 2008;13(5):680–9.
Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. p. 136–62.
Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 1980;88:588–606.
Bentler PM. On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:400–4.
CDC. HIV and AIDS among gay and bisexual men. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2010.
Metsch LR, Feaster DJ, Gooden L, Schackman BR, Matheson T, Das M, et al. Effect of risk-reduction counseling with rapid HIV testing on risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections: the AWARE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(16):1701–10.
Dilley JW, Woods WJ, Loeb L, Nelson K, Sheon N, Mullan J, et al. Brief cognitive counseling with HIV testing to reduce sexual risk among men who have sex with men: results from a randomized controlled trial using paraprofessional counselors. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(5):569–77.
Dilley JW, Woods WJ, Sabatino J, Lihatsh T, Adler B, Casey S, et al. Changing sexual behavior among gay male repeat testers for HIV: a randomized, controlled trial of a single-session intervention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;30(2):177–86.
CDC. HIV risk reduction tool 2015. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/hivrisk/.
CDC. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States—2014: a clinical practice guideline. In: Services DoHaH, editor. 2014.
van der Aalst CM, van Klaveren RJ, van den Bergh KA, Willemsen MC, de Koning HJ. The impact of a lung cancer computed tomography screening result on smoking abstinence. Eur Respir J. 2011;37(6):1466–73.
Acknowledgments
We thank all of the participants for their contributions to this study.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse through Grant #R01DA035145-01 awarded to Brian Mustanski.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Brian A. Feinstein declares that he has no conflict of interest. Brent A. Johnson declares that he has no conflict of interest. Jeffrey T. Parsons declares that he has no conflict of interest. Brian Mustanski declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feinstein, B.A., Johnson, B.A., Parsons, J.T. et al. Reactions to Testing HIV Negative: Measurement and Associations with Sexual Risk Behaviour Among Young MSM Who Recently Tested HIV Negative. AIDS Behav 21, 1467–1477 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1525-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1525-4