Abstract
Sexual concurrency may increase risk for HIV/STIs among youth. Attitudes about gender roles, including power balances within sexual partnerships, could be a driver. We examined this association among Baltimore youth (N = 352), aged 15–24. Data were collected from February, 2011 to May, 2013. We examined whether index concurrency in male-reported partnerships (N = 221) and sex partner’s concurrency in female-reported partnerships (N = 241) were associated with youth’s attitudes towards relationship power. Males with more equitable beliefs about power were less likely to report index concurrency. Females with more equitable beliefs were more likely to report sex partner’s concurrency. The relationship was significant in main and casual partnerships among females and main partnerships among males. The strongest associations were detected among middle-socioeconomic status (SES) males and low-SES and African American females. Implementing interventions that recognize the complex relationship between socioeconomic context, partner dynamics, gender, and sexual behavior is an important step towards reducing HIV/STI risk among youth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Potterat JJ, Zimmerman-Rogers H, Muth SQ, et al. Chiamydia transmission: concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(12):1331–9.
Rosenberg MD, Gurvey JE, Adler N, Dunlop MBV, Ellen JM. Concurrent sex partners and risk for sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26(4):208–12.
Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS. 1997;11(5):641.
Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and transmission dynamics in networks. Soc Netw. 1995;17(3–4):299–318.
Gorbach PM, Drumright LN, Holmes KK. Discord, discordance, and concurrency: comparing individual and partnership-level analyses of new partnerships of young adults at risk of sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(1):7–12.
McCreesh N, O’Brien K, Nsubuga RN, et al. Exploring the potential impact of a reduction in partnership concurrency on HIV incidence in rural Uganda: a modeling study. Sexually Transm Dis. 2012;39(6):407–13.
Morris M, Kurth AE, Hamilton DT, Moody J, Wakefield S. Concurrent partnerships and HIV prevalence disparities by race: linking science and public health practice. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(6):1023–31.
Kerrigan D, Andrinopoulos K, Chung S, Glass B, Ellen J. Gender ideologies, socioeconomic opportunities, and HIV/STI-related vulnerability among female, African-American adolescents. J Urban Health. 2008;85(5):717–26.
O’Sullivan LF, Hoffman S, Harrison A, Dolezal C. Men, multiple sexual partners, and young adults’ sexual relationships: understanding the role of gender in the study of risk. J Urban Health. 2006;83(4):695–708.
Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL, Ku LC. Masculinity ideology: its impact on adolescent males’ heterosexual relationships. J Soc Issues. 1993;49(3):11–29.
Santana MC, Raj A, Decker MR, La Marche A, Silverman JG. Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. J Urban Health. 2006;83(4):575–85.
Schoeneberger M, Logan T, Leukefeld C. Gender roles, HIV risk behaviors, and perceptions of using female condoms among college students. Popul Res Policy Rev. 1999;18(1–2):119–36.
Shearer CL, Hosterman SJ, Gillen MM, Lefkowitz ES. Are traditional gender role attitudes associated with risky sexual behavior and condom-related beliefs? Sex Roles. 2005;52(5–6):311–24.
Carey MP, Senn TE, Seward DX, Vanable PA. Urban African-American men speak out on sexual partner concurrency: findings from a qualitative study. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(1):38–47.
Kerrigan D, Andrinopoulos K, Johnson R, Parham P, Thomas T, Ellen JM. Staying strong: gender ideologies among African-American adolescents and the implications for HIV/STI prevention. J Sex Res. 2007;44(2):172–80.
Senn T, Scott-Sheldon L, Seward D, Wright E, Carey M. Sexual partner concurrency of urban male and female STD clinic patients: a qualitative study. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(4):775–84.
Towner SL, Dolcini MM, Harper GW. Romantic Relationship dynamics of urban african american adolescents: patterns of monogamy, commitment, and trust. Youth Soc. 2012.
Nunn A, Dickman S, Cornwall A, et al. Concurrent sexual partnerships among African American women in Philadelphia: results from a qualitative study. Sex Health. 2012;9(3):288–96.
Nunn A, Dickman S, Cornwall A, et al. Social, structural and behavioral drivers of concurrent partnerships among African American men in Philadelphia. AIDS Care. 2011;23(11):1392–9.
Ellen JM, Cahn S, Eyre SL, Boyer CB. Types of adolescent sexual relationships and associated perceptions about condom use. J Adolescent Health. 1996;18(6):417–21.
Katz BP, Fortenberry JD, Zimet GD, Blythe MJ, Orr DP. Partner-specific relationship characteristics and condom use among young people with sexually transmitted diseases. J Sex Res. 2000;37(1):69–75.
Lescano CM, Vazquez EA, Brown LK, Litvin EB, Pugatch D. Condom use with “casual” and “main” partners: what’s in a name? J Adolescent Health. 2006;39(3):443-e1–e7.
Whitehead TL. Urban low-income African American men, HIV/AIDS, and gender identity. Med Anthropol Q. 1997;11(4):411–47.
Secor-Turner M, Sieving R, Garwick A. Social messages, social context and teen sexual health: voices of urban African American youth. Am J Health Behav. 2011;35(2):162–74.
Tsui EK, Leonard L, Lenoir C, Ellen JM. Poverty and sexual concurrency: a case study of STI risk. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008;19(3):758–77.
Rosengard C, Adler NE, Gurvey JE, Ellen JM. Adolescent partner-type experience: psychosocial and behavioral differences. Perspect Sex Repro Health. 2005;37(3):141–7.
Hebert LE, Lilleston PS, Jennings JM, Sherman SG. Individual, partner, and partnership level correlates of anal sex among youth in Baltimore City. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(3):619–29.
Sherman SG, Gielen AC, McDonnell KA. Brief report: power and attitudes in relationships (PAIR) among a sample of low-income, African-American women: implications for HIV/AIDS prevention. Sex Roles. 2000;42(3):283–94.
Connell R. Gender and power: society, the person, and sexual politics. Redwood City: Stanford University Press; 1987.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw; 1994.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station: StataCorp LP.; 2009.
Lenoir CD, Adler NE, Borzekowski DLG, Tschann JM, Ellen JM. What you don’t know can hurt you: perceptions of sex-partner concurrency and partner-reported behavior. J Adolescent Health. 2006;38(3):179–85.
Polk S, Ellen JM, Chung SE, Huettner S, Jennings JM. Discordance between adolescent real and ideal sex partners and association with sexually transmitted infection risk behaviors. J Adolescent Health. 2011;48(6):604–9.
Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL, Ku LC. Masculinity ideology and its correlates. In: Oskamp S, Costanzo M, editors. Gender issues in social psychology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1993.
Kerrigan D, Telles P, Torres H, Overs C, Castle C. Community development and HIV/STI-related vulnerability among female sex workers in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(1):137.
Leech TG. Everything’s better in moderation: young women’s gender role attitudes and risky sexual behavior. J Adolescent Health. 2010;46(5):437–43.
Arnett JJ. Conceptions of the transition to adulthood among emerging adults in American ethnic groups. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2003;2003(100):63–76.
Epstein H, Morris M. Concurrent partnerships and HIV: an inconvenient truth. J Int AIDS Soc. 2011;14(1):13.
Ellen JM, Adler N, Gurvey JE, Millstein SG, Tschann J. Adolescent condom use and perceptions of risk for sexually transmitted diseases: a prospective study. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(12):756–62.
Matson PA, Adler NE, Millstein SG, Tschann JM, Ellen JM. Developmental changes in condom use among urban adolescent females: influence of partner context. J Adolescent Health. 2011;48(4):386–90.
Gorbach PM, Stoner BP, Aral SO, Whittington WL, Holmes KK. “ It Takes a Village”: understanding concurrent sexual partnerships in Seattle, Washington. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(8):453.
Hess KL, Gorbach PM, Manhart LE, Stoner BP, Martin DH, Holmes KK. Risk behaviours by type of concurrency among young people in three STI clinics in the United States. Sex Health. 2012;9(3):280–7.
Reed SJ, Bangi A, Sheon N, et al. Influences on sexual partnering among African American adolescents with concurrent sexual relationships. Res Hum Dev. 2012;9(1):78–101.
Neaigus A, Jenness SM, Hagan H, Murrill CS, Wendel T. Reciprocal sex partner concurrency and STDs among heterosexuals at high-risk of HIV infection. J Urban Health. 2013;90(5):902–14.
Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ. Contextual factors and the black-white disparity in heterosexual HIV transmission. Epidemiology. 2002;13(6):707–12.
Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson F, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR, Fullilove RE. Concurrent sexual partnerships among African Americans in the rural south. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14(3):155–60.
UNAIDS Reference Group on Estimates, Modelling, and Projections: Working Group on Measuring Concurrent Sexual Partnerships. HIV: consensus indicators are needed for concurrency. Lancet. 2010;375(9715):621–2.
Matson PA, Chung SE, Ellen JM. When they break up and get back together: length of adolescent romantic relationships and partner concurrency. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(4):281–5.
Nelson SJ, Manhart LE, Gorbach PM, et al. Measuring sex partner concurrency: it’s what’s missing that counts. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34(10):801–7.
Barker G, Ricardo C, Nascimento M, Olukoya A, Santos C. Questioning gender norms with men to improve health outcomes: evidence of impact. Glob Public Health. 2010;5(5):539–53.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the support of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD R01HD057789; PI Sherman) and the Johns Hopkins Center for AIDS Research (JHU CFAR; NIAID 1P30AI094189; PI Chaisson) for funding this study. P.S. Lilleston gratefully acknowledges doctoral support through the National Institutes of Health under Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award T32A1050056 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. J.M. Jennings was supported for this work by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (K01 DA022298-01A1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lilleston, P.S., Hebert, L.E., Jennings, J.M. et al. Attitudes Towards Power in Relationships and Sexual Concurrency Within Heterosexual Youth Partnerships in Baltimore, MD. AIDS Behav 19, 2280–2290 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1105-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1105-z