Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unannounced Telephone-Based Pill Counts: A Valid and Feasible Method for Monitoring Adherence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phone-based unannounced pill counts to measure medication adherence are much more practical and less expensive than home-based unannounced pill counts, but their validity has not been widely assessed. We examined the validity of phone versus home-based pill counts using a simplified protocol streamlined for studies embedded in clinical care settings. A total of 100 paired counts were used to compare concordance between unannounced phone and home-based pill counts using interclass correlations. Discrepancy analyses using χ2 tests compared demographic and clinical characteristics across patients who were concordant between phone and home-based pill counts and patients who were not concordant. Concordance was high for phone-based and home-based unannounced total pill counts, as well as individual medication counts and calculated adherence. This study demonstrates that a simplified phone-based pill count protocol can be implemented among patients from a routine clinical care setting and is a feasible means of monitoring medication adherence.

Resumen

Los conteos no anunciados de comprimidos por teléfono, con el propósito de medir el cumplimiento con respecto a los medicamentos, es mucho más práctico y menos costoso que los conteos no anunciados de comprimidos en el hogar, pero su validez no se ha evaluado en forma amplia. Examinamos la validez de los conteos no anunciados de comprimidos en el hogar, mediante el uso de un protocolo racionalizado para estudios integrados en ambientes de atención clínica. Un total de 100 conteos en pares se usaron para comparar la concordancia entre los conteos no anunciados de comprimidos por teléfono y en el hogar con correlaciones entre clases. Los análisis de discrepancia mediante pruebas χ2 compararon características demográficas y clínicas en los pacientes que fueron concordantes entre los conteos de comprimidos por teléfono y en el hogar y los pacientes que no fueron concordantes. Hubo una alta concordancia para los conteos no anunciados totales de comprimidos por teléfono y en el hogar, al igual que para los conteos de medicamentos individuales y para el cumplimiento calculado. Este estudio demuestra que se puede implementar un protocolo simplificado de conteo de comprimidos por teléfono entre los pacientes de un entorno de atención clínica de rutina y que es un medio factible para controlar el cumplimiento con respecto a los medicamentos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hogg RS, Heath K, Bangsberg D, et al. Intermittent use of triple-combination therapy is predictive of mortality at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. AIDS. 2002;16(7):1051–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paterson DL, Swindells S, Mohr J, et al. Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(1):21–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bangsberg DR, Hecht FM, Charlebois ED, et al. Adherence to protease inhibitors, HIV-1 viral load, and development of drug resistance in an indigent population. AIDS. 2000;14(4):357–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bangsberg DR, Perry S, Charlebois ED, et al. Non-adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy predicts progression to AIDS. AIDS. 2001;15(9):1181–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bangsberg DR, Charlebois ED, Grant RM, et al. High levels of adherence do not prevent accumulation of HIV drug resistance mutations. AIDS. 2003;17(13):1925–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia de Olalla P, Knobel H, Carmona A, Guelar A, Lopez-Colomes JL, Cayla JA. Impact of adherence and highly active antiretroviral therapy on survival in HIV-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;30(1):105–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mannheimer S, Friedland G, Matts J, Child C, Chesney M. The consistency of adherence to antiretroviral therapy predicts biologic outcomes for human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons in clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(8):1115–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood E, Hogg RS, Yip B, Harrigan PR, O’Shaughnessy MV, Montaner JS. Is there a baseline CD4 cell count that precludes a survival response to modern antiretroviral therapy? AIDS. 2003;17(5):711–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(5):487–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bangsberg DR. Monitoring adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy in routine clinical practice: the past, the present, and the future. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(3):249–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bangsberg DR, Hecht FM, Clague H, et al. Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;26(5):435–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Knobel H, Alonso J, Casado JL, et al. Validation of a simplified medication adherence questionnaire in a large cohort of HIV-infected patients: the GEEMA Study. AIDS. 2002;16(4):605–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simoni JM, Kurth AE, Pearson CR, Pantalone DW, Merrill JO, Frick PA. Self-report measures of antiretroviral therapy adherence: a review with recommendations for HIV research and clinical management. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(3):227–45.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu H, Golin CE, Miller LG, et al. A comparison study of multiple measures of adherence to HIV protease inhibitors. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(10):968–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nieuwkerk PT, Oort FJ. Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection and virologic treatment response: a meta-analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38(4):445–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arnsten JH, Demas PA, Farzadegan H, et al. Antiretroviral therapy adherence and viral suppression in HIV-infected drug users: comparison of self-report and electronic monitoring. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(8):1417–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pearson CR, Simoni JM, Hoff P, Kurth AE, Martin DP. Assessing antiretroviral adherence via electronic drug monitoring and self-report: an examination of key methodological issues. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(2):161–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kagee A, Nel A. Assessing the association between self-report items for HIV pill adherence and biological measures. AIDS Care. 2012;24(11):1448–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Petersen ML, Wang Y, van der Laan MJ, Guzman D, Riley E, Bangsberg DR. Pillbox organizers are associated with improved adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy and viral suppression: a marginal structural model analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(7):908–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fennie KP, Bova CA, Williams AB. Adjusting and censoring electronic monitoring device data. Implications for study outcomes. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43(Suppl 1):S88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cramer JA, Mattson RH, Prevey ML, Scheyer RD, Ouellette VL. How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment technique. JAMA. 1989;261(22):3273–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pullar T, Kumar S, Tindall H, Feely M. Time to stop counting the tablets? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989;46(2):163–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Paes AH, Bakker A, Soe-Agnie CJ. Measurement of patient compliance. Pharm World Sci. 1988;20(2):73–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moss AR, Hahn JA, Perry S, et al. Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy in the homeless population in San Francisco: a prospective study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(8):1190–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Giordano TP, Guzman D, Clark R, Charlebois ED, Bangsberg DR. Measuring adherence to antiretroviral therapy in a diverse population using a visual analogue scale. HIV Clin Trials. 2004;5(2):74–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weiser SD, Guzman D, Riley ED, Clark R, Bangsberg DR. Higher rates of viral suppression with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors compared to single protease inhibitors are not explained by better adherence. HIV Clin Trials. 2004;5(5):278–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weiser SD, Frongillo EA, Ragland K, Hogg RS, Riley ED, Bangsberg DR. Food insecurity is associated with incomplete HIV RNA suppression among homeless and marginally housed HIV-infected individuals in San Francisco. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(1):14–20.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oyugi JH, Byakika-Tusiime J, Charlebois ED, et al. Multiple validated measures of adherence indicate high levels of adherence to generic HIV antiretroviral therapy in a resource-limited setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;36(5):1100–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Haberer JE, Robbins GK, Ybarra M, et al. Real-time electronic adherence monitoring is feasible, comparable to unannounced pill counts, and acceptable. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(2):375–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalichman SC, Amaral CM, Stearns H, et al. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy assessed by unannounced pill counts conducted by telephone. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(7):1003–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kalichman SC, Amaral CM, Cherry C, et al. Monitoring medication adherence by unannounced pill counts conducted by telephone: reliability and criterion-related validity. HIV Clin Trials. 2008;9(5):298–308.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bangsberg D, Hecht FM, Charlebois ED, Chesney M, Moss A. Comparing objective measures of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy: electronic medication monitors and unannounced pill counts. AIDS Behav. 2001;5(3):275–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kalichman SC, Amaral C, Swetsze C, et al. Monthly unannounced pill counts for monitoring HIV treatment adherence: tests for self-monitoring and reactivity effects. HIV Clin Trials. 2010;11(6):325–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chesney MA, Ickovics JR, Chambers DB, et al. Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral medications among participants in HIV clinical trials: the AACTG adherence instruments. Patient Care Committee & Adherence Working Group of the Outcomes Committee of the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (AACTG). AIDS Care. 2000;12(3):255–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lu M, Safren SA, Skolnik PR, et al. Optimal recall period and response task for self-reported HIV medication adherence. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(1):86–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Walsh JC, Mandalia S, Gazzard BG. Responses to a 1 month self-report on adherence to antiretroviral therapy are consistent with electronic data and virological treatment outcome. AIDS. 2002;16(2):269–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kalichman SC, Cain D, Fuhrel A, Eaton L, Di Fonzo K, Ertl T. Assessing medication adherence self-efficacy among low-literacy patients: development of a pictographic visual analogue scale. Health Educ Res. 2005;20(1):24–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Paterson DL, Potoski B, Capitano B. Measurement of adherence to antiretroviral medications. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;31(Suppl 3):S103–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fredericksen RJ, Crane PK, Tufano J, et al. Integrating a web-based patient assessent into primary care for HIV-infected adults. J AIDS HIV Res. 2012;4(2):47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Crane HM, Lober WB, Webster E, et al. Routine collection of patient-reported outcomes in an HIV clinic setting: the first 100 patients. Curr HIV Res. 2007;5(1):109–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient health questionnaire. JAMA. 1999;282(18):1737–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Newcombe DA, Humeniuk RE, Ali R. Validation of the World Health Organization Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): report of results from the Australian site. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2005;24(3):217–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. WHO Assist Working Group. The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. Addiction. 2002;97(9):1183–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bradley KA, Bush KR, Epler AJ, et al. Two brief alcohol-screening tests From the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): validation in a female veterans affairs patient population. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(7):821–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol use disorders identification test. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(16):1789–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gual A, Segura L, Contel M, Heather N, Colom J. AUDIT-3 and AUDIT-4: effectiveness of two short forms of the alcohol use disorders identification test. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002;37(6):591–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Thompson N, Nazir N, Cox LS, et al. Unannounced telephone pill counts for assessing varenicline adherence in a pilot clinical trial. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:475–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kalichman SC, Grebler T, Amaral CM, et al. Assumed infectiousness, treatment adherence and sexual behaviours: applying the Swiss Statement on infectiousness to HIV-positive alcohol drinkers. HIV Med. 2013;14(5):263–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bangsberg DR. Less than 95 % adherence to nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor therapy can lead to viral suppression. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(7):939–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kalichman SC, Cherry C, Amaral C, et al. Health and treatment implications of food insufficiency among people living with HIV/AIDS Atlanta Georgia. J Urban Health. 2010;87(4):631–41.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kalichman SC, Pellowski J, Kalichman MO, et al. Food insufficiency and medication adherence among people living with HIV/AIDS in urban and peri-urban settings. Prev Sci. 2011;12(3):324–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kalichman SC, Amaral CM, Swetzes C, et al. A simple single-item rating scale to measure medication adherence: further evidence for convergent validity. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic Ill). 2009;8(6):367–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kalichman SC, Pope H, White D, et al. Association between health literacy and HIV treatment adherence: further evidence from objectively measured medication adherence. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2008;7(6):317–23.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kalichman SC, Kalichman MO, Cherry C, et al. Brief behavioral self-regulation counseling for HIV treatment adherence delivered by cell phone: an initial test of concept trial. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2011;25(5):303–10.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kalichman SC, Cherry C, Kalichman MO, et al. Randomized clinical trial of HIV treatment adherence counseling interventions for people living with HIV and limited health literacy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(1):42–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Parienti JJ, Das-Douglas M, Massari V, et al. Not all missed doses are the same: sustained NNRTI treatment interruptions predict HIV rebound at low-to-moderate adherence levels. PLoS One. 2008;3(7):e2783.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sankatsing RR, Wit FW, Vogel M, et al. Increased carotid intima-media thickness in HIV patients treated with protease inhibitors as compared to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Atherosclerosis. 2009;202(2):589–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the patients and providers of the UW Madison HIV clinic. Seth Kalichman generously provided protocols for phone-based pill counts and provided other insights that allowed this project to occur. This study and different aspects of the data were supported by Grants from the NIH NIMH RO1 Grant (RO1 MH084759), NIH PROMIS Roadmap (U01 AR057954-S1), the University of Washington Center for AIDS Research NIAID Grant (P30 AI027757), NIAAA ARCH-ERA U24 AA020801, U01AA020793, and the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS) Grant (R24 AI067039).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi M. Crane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fredericksen, R., Feldman, B.J., Brown, T. et al. Unannounced Telephone-Based Pill Counts: A Valid and Feasible Method for Monitoring Adherence. AIDS Behav 18, 2265–2273 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0916-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0916-7

Keywords

Navigation