Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neglected Issues and Hypotheses Regarding the Impact of Sexual Concurrency on HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections

  • Commentary
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. HIV: consensus indicators are needed for concurrency. UNAIDS reference group on estimates modelling and projections working group on measuring concurrent sexual partnerships. Lancet. 2010;375(9715):621–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lurie MN, Rosenthal S. Concurrent partnerships as a driver of the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa? The evidence is limited. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(1):17–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mah TL, Halperin DT. Concurrent sexual partnerships and the HIV epidemics in Africa: Evidence to move forward. AIDS Behav. 2009;14(1):25–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalishman SC, Grebler T. Reducing the number of sex partners: do we really need special intervention for sexual concurrency? AIDS Behav. 2010;14(5):987–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Morris M. Barking up the wrong evidence tree. Comment on Lurie and Rosenthal, “Concurrent partnerships as a driver of the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa? The evidence is limited”. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(1):32–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aral SO. Partner concurrency and the STI/HIV epidemic. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2010;12:134–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reniers G, Watkins S. Polygyny and the spread of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: a case of benign concurrency. AIDS. 2010;24:299–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lurie M, Rosenthal S, Williams B. Concurrency driving the African HIV epidemics: where is the evidence? Lancet. 2009;374:1420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein H. The mathematics of concurrent partnerships in Africa’s HIV epidemics: a response to Lurie Rosenthal. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(1):29–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boily MC. Polygyny, concurrency, its impact and lack of impact on HIV: the road ahead. HIV Therapy. 2010;4:139–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sawers L, Stillwaggon E. Concurrent sexual partnerships do not explain the HIV epidemics in Africa: a systematic review of the evidence. Journal of the International AIDS society. 2010;13:34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS. 1997;11:641–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghani AC, Garnett GP. Risks of acquiring and transmitting sexually transmitted diseases in sexual partner networks. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27(10):579–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kretzschmar M, Morris M. Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious diseases. Math Biosci. 1996;133:165–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Watts CH, May RM. The influence of concurrent partnerships on the dynamics of HIV/AIDS. Math Biosci. 1992;108(1):89–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Doherty IA, Shiboski S, Ellen JM, Adimora AA, Padian NS. Sexual bridging socially and over time: a simulation model exploring the relative effects of mixing and concurrency on viral sexually transmitted infection transmission. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(6):368–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lagarde E, Auvert B, Carael M, et al. Concurrent sexual partnerships and HIV prevalence in five urban communities of sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS. 2001;15(7):877–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mishra V, Assche SBV. Concurrent sexual partnerships and HIV infection: Evidence from national population-based surveys. DHS Working Paper 62. 2009; Accessed at http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/WP62/WP62.pdf on January 7th, 2011.

  19. Helleringer S, Kohlerb HP, Kalilani-Phiric L. The association of HIV serodiscordance and partnership concurrency in Likoma Island (Malawi). AIDS. 2009;23(10):1285–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koumans E, Farely T, Gibson J. Characteristics of persons with syphilis in areas of persisting syphilis in the United States: sustained transmission associated with concurrent partnerships. STD. 2001;28(9):497–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Potterat J, Zimmerman-Rogers H, Muth SQ, et al. Chlamydia transmission: concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:1331–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Javanbakht M, Gorbach PM, Amani B, et al. Concurrency, sex partner risk, and high-risk human papillomavirus infection among African American, Asian and hispanic women. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37(2):68–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morris M, Epstein H, Wawer M. Timing is everything: International variations in historical sexual partnership concurrency and HIV prevalence. PLoS ONE 5(11):e14092.

  24. Boily MC, Lowndes C, Gregson S. Population-level risk factors for HIV-transmission and the four cities study: temporal dynamics and the significance of sexual mixing patterns. AIDS. 2002;16(15):2101–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kretzschmar M, White RG, Carael M. Concurrency is more complex than it seems. AIDS. 2010;24:313–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Santhakumaran S, O’Brien K, Bakker R, et al. Polygyny and symmetric concurrency: comparing long-duration sexually transmitted infection prevalence using simulated sexual networks. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86(7):553–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Poulin R, Boily MC, Mâsse BR. Dynamical systems to define centrality in social networks. Social Networks. 2000;22:187–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boily MC, Garske T, Asghar Z, Poulin R, Ghani A. Influence of selected formation rules for finite population networks with fixed macrostructures: implications for individual-based model of infectious diseases. Mathematical Population Studies. 2007;14(4):237–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eaton J, Hallett T, Garnett GP. Concurrent sexual partnerships and primary HIV Infection—a critical interaction. AIDS Behav. doi:10.1007/s10461-010-9787-8.

  30. Goodreau SM, Cassels s, Kasprzyk D, Montano DE, Greek A, Morris M. Concurrent partnerships, Acute infection and HIV epidemic dynamics among young adults in Zimbabwe. AIDS Behav Dec 30th 2010. (in press).

  31. Goodreau SM, Cassels s, Kasprzyk D, Montano DE, Greek A, Morris M. Concurrent partnerships and the proportion of transmissions by stage of infection for HIV in Zimbabwe http://paa2010.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionid=101936 (accessed January 7th 2011).

  32. Eaton JW. Mathematical models of concurrent sexual partnerships and HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: Upgrade PhD report. Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology. Imperial College London; December 1, 2009. p. 1–82.

  33. Phillips A, Gomez GB, Garnett GP, Boily MC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interviewing tools to investigate HIV risk behaviour in developing countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(6):1541–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cohen MS, Pilcher CD. Amplified HIV transmission and new approaches to HIV prevention. JID. 2005;191:1391–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Baggaley RF, White RG, Boily MC. HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(4):1048–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Boily MC, Baggaley RF, Wang L, et al. Heterosexual risk of HIV-1 infection per sexual act: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(2):118–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Modjarrad K, Vermund SH. Effect of treating co-infections on HIV-1 viral load: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(7):455–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Garnett GP, Swinton J, Brunham RC, Anderson RM. Gonococcal infection, infertility, and population growth: II. The influence of heterogeneity in sexual behaviour. IMA J Math Appl Med Biol. 1992;9(2):127–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Boily MC, Mâsse B. Mathematical models of disease transmission. A precious tool for the study of sexually transmitted diseases. Can J of Public Health. 1997;88(4):255–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Padian NS, Buvé A, Balkus J, Serwadda D, Cates W Jr. Biomedical interventions to prevent HIV infection: evidence, challenges, and way forward. Lancet. 2008;372(9638):585–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hallett TB, Gregson S, Lewis JJ, Lopman BA, Garnett GP. Behaviour change in generalised HIV epidemics: impact of reducing cross-generational sex and delaying age at sexual debut. Sex Trans Infect. 2007;83(Suppl 1):i50–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Boily MC, Godin G, Hogben M, Sherr L, Bastos FI. The impact of the transmission dynamics of the HIV/AIDS epidemic on sexual behaviour: A new hypothesis to explain recent increases in risk taking-behaviour among men who have sex with men. Med Hypotheses. 2005;65(2):215–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Claude Boily.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boily, MC., Alary, M. & Baggaley, R.F. Neglected Issues and Hypotheses Regarding the Impact of Sexual Concurrency on HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections. AIDS Behav 16, 304–311 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-9887-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-9887-0

Keywords

Navigation