Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In the Heart or in the Head: Relationship and Cognitive Influences on Sexual Risk Among Young Couples

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few studies examine how relationship factors influence sexual risk. We investigated gender differences of the influence of relationship functioning on sexual risk behavior and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among 296 young pregnant couples. Compared to women, men were twice as likely to have a concurrent partner, were less likely to intend to be monogamous in the future, had less HIV/STI knowledge and more perceived risk for HIV/STI, negative attitudes and efficacy toward condom use (all P < 0.05). For men, poor relationship functioning related to less intentions to be monogamous, more partner concurrency, worse sexual communication, and more condom use. For women, poor relationship functioning related to worse sexual communication and less condom use. In addition, women who had good relationship functioning and women who had partners with poor relationship functioning were more likely to have an STI. These results demonstrate the need to include heterosexual men and relationship factors in HIV prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Furman W. The emerging field of adolescent romantic relationships. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2002;11(5):177–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Furman W, Shaffer L. The role of romantic relationships in adolescent development. In: Florsheim P, editor. Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003. p. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Misovich SJ, et al. Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior: Evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Rev Gen Psychol. 1997;1(1):72–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malow RM, et al. HIV preventive interventions for adolescents: A look back and ahead. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007;4(4):173–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Bassel N, et al. HIV prevention for intimate couples: a relationship-based model. Fam Syst Health. 2001;19(4):379–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kershaw T, et al. Let’s stay together: relationship dissolution among parenting and non-parenting adolescents. J Behav Med. 2010;33(6):454–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kershaw TS, et al. Avoidance, anxiety, and sex: the influence of romantic attachment on HIV-risk among pregnant women. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(2):299–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aalsma MC, et al. Adolescent romantic partnerships and health-risk behaviors: a comparison of dyad members. J Adolesc Health. 2004;34(2):151–2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Choi KH, et al. Extramarital sex and HIV risk behavior among US adults: results from the national AIDS behavioral survey. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(12):2003–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gee CB, Rhodes JE. Postpartum transitions in adolescent mothers’ romantic and maternal relationships. Merrill-Palmer Q. 1999;45(3):512–32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ott MA, et al. Longitudinal associations among relationship factors, partner change, and sexually transmitted infection acquisition in adolescent women. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(3):153–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Niccolai LM, et al. New sex partner acquisition and sexually transmitted disease risk among adolescent females. J Adolesc Health. 2004;34(3):216–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Foxman B, et al. Measures of sexual partnerships: lengths, gaps, overlaps, and sexually transmitted infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(4):209–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalichman SC, Grebler T. Reducing numbers of sex partners: do we really need special interventions for sexual concurrency? AIDS Behav. 2010;14(5):987–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kretzschmar M, Dietz K. The effect of pair formation and variable infectivity on the spread of an infection without recovery. Math Biosci. 1998;148(1):83–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson SR, et al. Correlates of sexual risk for HIV infection in female members of heterosexual California Latino couples: An application of a Bernoulli process model. AIDS Behav. 2003;7(i):273–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seal DW, Ehrhardt AA. HIV-prevention-related sexual health promotion for heterosexual men in the United States: pitfalls and recommendations. Arch Sex Behav. 2004;33(3):211–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strathdee SA, et al. Sex differences in risk factors for HIV seroconversion among injection drug users: a 10-year perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(10):1281–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. CDC. HIV/AIDS surveillance report 2002. Rockville, Maryland: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002.

  20. Kaiser Family Foundation. What teens know and don’t (but should) about sexually transmitted diseases. Menlo Park: Kaiser Family Foundation, 1998.

  21. Grunbaum J, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States 2003. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53(SS02):1–96.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fortenberry JD. Health behaviors and reproductive health risk within adolescent sexual dyads. In: Florsheim P, editor. Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior. Mahwah: Lawurence Erlbaum Publishers; 2003. p. 279–96.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in large social networks over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(4):370–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(21):2249–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dulude D, et al. High-risk pregnancies, psychological distress, and dyadic adjustment. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2002;20(2):101–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cox MJ, et al. The transition to parenthood: marital conflict and withdrawal and parent-infant interactions. In: Cox MJ, Brooks-Gunn J, editors. Conflict and cohesion in families. Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates; 1999. p. 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ketterlinus RD, et al. Development and ecological sources of stress among adolescent parents. Fam Relat Interdiscip J Appl Fam Stud. 1991;40(4):435–41.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bost KK, et al. Structural and supportive changes in couples’ family and friendship networks across the transition to parenthood. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64(2):517–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Florsheim P, et al. The transition to parenthood among young African American and Latino couples: relational predictors of risk for parental dysfunction. J Fam Psychol. 2003;17(1):65–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Abma JC. Adolescent pregnancy and childbirth: United States, 1991–2008. In: CDC, editor. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Atlanta: CDC; 2011.

  31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS surveillance in adolescents and young adults (through 2007), 2009.

  32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fact Sheet: HIV in the United States. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2010.

  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in reportable sexually transmitted diseases in the United States, national surveillance data for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Syphilis. Atlanta: CDC; 2009.

  34. Chesson HW, et al. The estimated direct medical cost of sexually transmitted diseases among American youth. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36(1):11–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hein K, et al. Comparison of HIV+ and HIV− adolescents: risk factors and psychosocial determinants. Pediatrics. 1995;95(1):96–104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Laga M et al. Non ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases (STD) as risk factors for HIV infection. In: Sixth international AIDS conference, San Francisco; 1990.

  37. Plummer F. Co-factors in male-female sexual transmission of HIV type I. J Infect Dis. 1991;163(2):233–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wasserheit J. Epidemiological synergy: Interrelationships between human immunodeficiency virus infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 1992;19(2):95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ickovics, et al. High postpartum rates of sexually transmitted infections among teens: Pregnancy as a window of opportunity for prevention. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79:469–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Meade CS, Ickovics JR. Systematic review of sexual risk among pregnant and mothering teens in the USA: pregnancy as an opportunity for integrated prevention of STD and repeat pregnancy. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(4):661–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Donenberg GR, Pao M. Youths and HIV/AIDS: psychiatry’s role in a changing epidemic. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44(8):728–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scale for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam. 1976;38(1):15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Helweg-Larsen M, Collins BE. The UCLA multidimensional condom attitudes scale: documenting the complex determinants of condom use in college students. Health Psychol. 1994;13(3):224–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Brafford LJ, Beck KH. Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. J Am Coll Health. 1991;39(5):219–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kershaw TS, et al. Pregnancy as a window of opportunity for HIV prevention: effects of an HIV intervention delivered within prenatal care. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(11):2079–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sikkema KJ, et al. HIV risk behaviors among women living in low-income, inner-city housing developments. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(8):1123–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kenny DA, et al. Dyadic data analysis. New York: The Guilford Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cohen S. Social relationships and health. Am Psychol. 2004;59(8):676–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hamilton BE et al. Births: preliminary data for 2009. National vital statistics reports. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010, 59(3).

  50. Bowleg L, et al. What does it take to be a man? What is a real man?: ideologies of masculinity and HIV sexual risk among black heterosexual men. Cult Health Sex. 2011;13(5):545–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Coley RL. (In)visible men. Emerging research on low-income, unmarried, and minority fathers. Am Psychol. 2001;56(9):743–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Coley RL, Morris JE. Comparing father and mother reports of father involvement among low-income minority families. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64(4):982–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bowleg L. Love, sex, and masculinity in sociocultural context. Men Masc. 2004;7(2):166–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Logan TK, et al. Women, sex, and HIV: social and contextual factors, meta-analysis of published interventions, and implications for practice and research. Psychol Bull. 2002;128(6):851–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Garnett GP, et al. Fewer partners or more condoms? Modeling the effectiveness of STI prevention interventions. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(Suppl 2):4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Pinkerton SD, Abramson PR. Evaluating the risks: a Bernoulli process model of HIV infection and risk reduction. Eval Rev. 1993;17(5):504–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Johnson BT, et al. Behavioral interventions for African Americans to reduce sexual risk of HIV: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51(4):492–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Noar SM. Behavioral interventions to reduce HIV-related sexual risk behavior: review and synthesis of meta-analytic evidence. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(3):335–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. El-Bassel N, et al. The efficacy of a relationship-based HIV/STD prevention program for heterosexual couples. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):963–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. El-Bassel N, et al. Long-term effects of an HIV/STI sexual risk reduction intervention for heterosexual couples. AIDS Behav. 2005;9(1):1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Milan S, et al. Prevalence, course, and predictors of emotional distress in pregnant and parenting adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(2):328–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Frosch CA, et al. Marital behavior and the security of preschooler-parent attachment relationships. J Fam Psychol. 2000;14(1):144–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Cutrona CE, et al. Predictors and correlates of continuing involvement with the baby’s father among adolescent mothers. J Fam Psychol. 1998;12(3):369–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Coyne JC, et al. Prognostic importance of marital quality for survival of congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(5):526–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Holt-Lunstad J, et al. Influence of a “warm touch” support enhancement intervention among married couples on ambulatory blood pressure, oxytocin, alpha amylase, and cortisol. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(9):976–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Holt-Lunstad J, et al. The influence of close relationships on nocturnal blood pressure dipping. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009;71(3):211–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Mental Health (1R01MH75685).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trace Kershaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kershaw, T., Arnold, A., Gordon, D. et al. In the Heart or in the Head: Relationship and Cognitive Influences on Sexual Risk Among Young Couples. AIDS Behav 16, 1522–1531 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-0049-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-0049-1

Keywords

Navigation