Abstract
Computerised virtual patients (VPs) are increasingly being used in medical education. With more use of this technology, there is a need to increase the knowledge of students’ experiences with VPs. The aim of the study was to elicit the nature of virtual patients in a clinical setting, taking the students’ experience as a point of departure. Thirty-one students used VPs as a mandatory part of an early clinical rotation in rheumatology. Using the qualitative approach of phenomenology, we interviewed these students and then analysed data regarding their experiences of VPs as a learning activity. The result shows that students perceived VP activities in relation to actual patients, the clinical context and other learning activities. The VPs represented typical clinical cases which encouraged clinical reasoning and allowed for decision making. The students experienced the activities as integrating biomedical knowledge and clinical experience, providing structure that prepared for the unstructured clinical environment and patient encounters under unstressful conditions. However, the VPs were experienced as lacking the emotional interactivity and complexity of actual patients. Theoretical frameworks of clinical reasoning and experiential learning are suggested as foundations for further educational integration of VPs in the clinical environment. VP activities during clinical rotations provide experiences of clinical reality and allow students to solve problems actively. These features are dependent on VP technology but are also contingent on the surrounding environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bearman, M. (2003). Is virtual the same as real? Medical students’ experiences of a virtual patient. Academic Medicine, 78(5), 538–545.
Bergin, R., Youngblood, P., Ayers, M. K., Boberg, J., Bolander, K., Courteille, O., et al. (2003). Interactive simulated patient: Experiences with collaborative e-learning in medicine. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 387–400.
Berman, N. B., Fall, L. H., Maloney, C. G., & Levine, D. A. (2008). Computer-assisted instruction in clinical education: a roadmap to increasing CAI implementation. Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory and Practice, 13(3), 373–383.
Berman, N., Fall, L. H., Smith, S., Levine, D. A., Maloney, C. G., Potts, M., et al. (2009). Integration strategies for using virtual patients in clinical clerkships. Academic Medicine, 84(7), 942–949.
Boud, D., & Prosser, M. (2002). Appraising new technologies for learning: A framework for development. Educational Media International, 39, 237–245.
Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1993). Barriers to reflection on experience. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & D. Walker (Eds.), Using experience for learning. Bristol: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Bowen, J. L. (2006). Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(21), 2217–2225.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Bryce, D. A., King, N. J., Graebner, C. F., Myers, J. H. (1998). Evaluation of a diagnostic reasoning program (DxR): Exploring student perceptions and addressing faculty concerns. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 98(1).
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Learning and existence. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 119–135). New York: Oxford U.P.
Cook, D. A. (2005). The research we still are not doing: An agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Academic Medicine, 80(6), 541–548.
Cook, D. A., Bordage, G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Description, justification and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Medical Education, 42(2), 128–133.
Cook, D. A., Erwin, P. J., & Triola, M. M. (2010). Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine, 85(10), 1589–1602.
Cook, D. A., & Triola, M. M. (2009). Virtual patients: A critical literature review and proposed next steps. Medical Education, 43(4), 303–311.
Dall’Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2005). Embodied knowing in online environments. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(5), 719–744.
de Leng, B. A., Muijtjens, A. M., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2009). The effect of face-to-face collaborative learning on the elaboration of computer-based simulated cases. Simulation in Healthcare, 4(4), 217–222.
Dornan, T., Boshuizen, H., King, N., & Scherpbier, A. (2007). Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. Medical Education, 41(1), 84–91.
Edelbring, S. (2010). A threefold framework for relating to innovations and technology in education: Learning from, with and about technology. In A. Bromage, L. Clouder, J. Thistlethwaite, & F. Gordon (Eds.), Interprofessional e-learning and collaborative work: Practices and technologies. Hershey: IGI Global.
Ellaway, R., Poulton, T., Fors, U., McGee, J. B., & Albright, S. (2008). Building a virtual patient commons. Medical Teacher, 30(2), 170–174.
Fern, E. F. (1982). The use of focus groups for idea generation: The effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(1), 1–13.
Friedman, C. P. (1994). The research we should be doing. Academic Medicine, 69(6), 455–457.
Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. London, New York: Routledge.
Giorgi, A. (1985). Phenomenology and psychological research. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (1 English ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Huang, G. M. D., Reynolds, R. M. P. A., & Candler, C. M. D. (2007). Virtual patient simulation at US and Canadian medical schools. Academic Medicine, 82(5), 446–451.
Huwendiek, S., De Leng, B. A., Zary, N., Fischer, M. R., Ruiz, J. G., & Ellaway, R. (2009). Towards a typology of virtual patients. Medical Teacher, 31(8), 743–748.
Irby, D. M. (1994). Three exemplary models of case-based teaching. Academic Medicine, 69(12), 947–953.
Karlsson, G. (1993). Psychological qualitative research from a phenomenological perspective. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Kenny, N. P., & Beagan, B. L. (2004). The patient as text: A challenge for problem-based learning. Medical Education, 38(10), 1071–1079.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Larsson, S. (2009). A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 25–38.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Merriënboer, J. J. V., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: Design principles and strategies. Medical Education, 44(1), 85–93.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Newble, D., Norman, G., & van der Vleuten, C. (2000). Assessing clinical reasoning. In J. Higgs & M. A. Jones (Eds.), Clinical reasoning in the health professions (2nd ed., pp. 156–168). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Norman, G. (2005). Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Medical Education, 39(4), 418–427.
Norman, G. (2006). Editorial—Less is more. Advances in Health Science Education Theory and Practice, 11(2), 111–114.
Sandroni, S. (1997). Enhancing clinical teaching with information technologies: What can we do right now? Academic Medicine, 72(9), 770–774.
Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.
Sixsmith, J. A., & Sixsmith, A. J. (1987). Empirical phenomenology: Principles and method. Quality & Quantity, 21(3), 313–333.
Spencer, J. (2003). Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. BMJ, 326(7389), 591–594.
Wahlgren, C. F., Edelbring, S., Fors, U., Hindbeck, H., & Stahle, M. (2006). Evaluation of an interactive case simulation system in dermatology and venereology for medical students. BMC Medical Education, 6, 40.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Marika Kvarnström who managed the rotations and facilitaded the interview sessions. The first author wishes to acknowledge the constructive feedback on earlier drafts given by C. Van der Vleuten and J. Van Merriënboer at Maastricht University and at the CME doctoral seminar at Karolinska Institutet. Part of the analysis was presented at the AMEE conference in Malaga in 2009. This study has been made possible through the regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edelbring, S., Dastmalchi, M., Hult, H. et al. Experiencing virtual patients in clinical learning: a phenomenological study. Adv in Health Sci Educ 16, 331–345 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9265-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9265-0