Skip to main content
Log in

Editorial — How Bad Is Medical Education Research Anyway?

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Davis D.A., Mazmanian P.E., Fordis M., Van Harrison R., Thorpe K.E. & Perrier L. (2006) Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 296: 1094–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva K.W. & Regehr G. (2005) Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine 80: S46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman G.R. (2003) Commentary: RCT = results confused and trivial: The perils of grand educational experiments. Medical Education 37: 582–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman G.R. (2004) Theory testing research vs. theory based research. Advances in Health Sciences Education 9: 175–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuwirth L.W.T. & van der Vleuten C.P.M. (2006) Challenges for educationalists. British Medical Journal 333: 544–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Norman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norman, G. Editorial — How Bad Is Medical Education Research Anyway?. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 12, 1–5 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9047-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9047-x

Navigation