Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How aging affects self-reports

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A lot of information used in aging research relies on self-reports. Surveys or questionnaires are used to assess quality of life, attitudes toward aging, experiences of aging, subjective well-being, symptomatology, health behaviors, financial information, medication adherence, etc. Growing evidence suggests that older and younger respondents are differentially affected by questionnaire features and the cognitive tasks that question answering pose. This research has shown that age-related changes in cognitive and communicative functioning can lead to age-related differences in self-reports that are erroneously interpreted as real age differences in attitudes and behaviors. The current review highlights how the processes underlying respondents’ self-report change as a function of respondents’ age; it updates our previous reviews of this literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeele MV, Beullens K, Roe K (2013) Measuring mobile phone use: gender, age and real usage level in relation to the accuracy and validity of self-reported mobile phone use. Mob Med Comm 1:213–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews FM, Herzog AR (1986) The quality of survey data as related to age of respondent. J Am Stat Assoc 81:403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley AD (2007) Working memory, thought and action. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belson WA (1981) The design and understanding of survey questions. Gower, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen GV, Wyer RS (1987) Social cognition and social reality: Information acquisition and use in the laboratory and the real world. In: Sudman S (ed) Hippler HJ, Schwarz M. Social information processing and survey methodology. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 6–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchelt M, Gilberg R, Horgas AL, Geiselmann B (1999) On the significance of morbidity and disability in old age. In: Baltes PB, Mayer KU (eds) The Berlin aging study: aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 403–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn NM, Rips LJ, Shevell SK (1987) Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science 236:157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark HH, Schober MF (1992) Asking questions and influencing answers. In: Tanur JM (ed) Questions about questions. Russel Sage, New York, pp 15–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Coiner TF, Schober MF, Conrad FG, Ehlen P (2002) Assessing respondents’ need for clarification in web surveys using age-based user modeling. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association. American Statistical Association, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  • Colsher PL, Wallace RB (1989) Data quality and age: health and psychobehavioral correlates of item nonresponse and inconsistent responses. J Geront 44:P45–P52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad FG, Schober MF (2000) Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey. Public Opin Quart 64:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox MT, Sidani S, Streiner D (2007) Using standardized survey items with older adults hospitalized for chronic illness. Res Nurs Health 30:468–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen KJ, Beck KW (1966) Communication in the interview and the disengaged respondent. Public Opin Quart 30:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice P (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics, vol 3., Speech actsAcademic Press, New York, pp 41–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne JK, Germine LT (2015) When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span. Psychol Sci 26:433–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog AR, Dielman L (1985) Age differences in response accuracy for factual survey questions. J Geront 40:350–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook A, Cho YI, Johnson T (2006) The impact of question and respondent characteristics on comprehension and mapping difficulties. Public Opin Quart 70:565–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldenberg DO, Koenig HF, Becker BW (1994) Mail survey response rate patterns in a population of the elderly: does response deteriorate with age? Public Opin Quart 58:68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knäuper B (1999) The impact of age and education on response order effects in attitude measurement. Public Opin Quart 63:347–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knäuper B, Belli RF, Hill DH, Herzog AR (1997) Question difficulty and respondents’ cognitive ability: the impact on data quality. J Off Stat 13:181–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Knäuper B, Schwarz N, Park DC (2004) Frequency reports across age groups. J Off Stat 20:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Knäuper B, Schwarz N, Park D, Fritsch A (2007) The perils of interpreting age differences in attitude reports: question order effects decrease with age. J Off Stat 23:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Krestar M, Looman W, Powers S, Dawson N, Judge K (2012) Including individuals with memory impairment in the research process: the importance of scales and response categories used in surveys. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 7:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick JA (1991) Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Appl Cognit Psychol 5:213–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick JA, Alwin DF (1987) An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Public Opin Quart 51:201–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Visser PS (2006) Optimizing brief assessments in research on the psychology of aging: a pragmatic approach to self-report measurement. In: Carstensen LL, Hartel CR (eds) When I’m 64. National Academies Press, Washington DC, p 231

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton M (1982) Transformations of memory in everyday life. In: Neisser U (ed) Memory observed: remembering in natural contexts. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiowetz NA, Duncan GJ (1988) Out of work, out of mind: response errors in retrospective reports of unemployment. J Bus Econ Stat 6:221–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield M, Kluck B, Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Cox CR, Solomon S, Weise D (2007) Age-related differences in responses to thoughts of one’s own death: mortality salience and judgments of moral transgressions. Psychol Aging 22:341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon G, Raghubir P, Schwarz N (1995) Behavioral frequency judgments: an accessibility-diagnosticity framework. J Cons Res 22:212–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser U (1986) Nested structure in autobiographical memory. In: Rubin DC (ed) Autobiogra-phical memory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 71–88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Olton DS, Becker JT, Handelmann GE (1980) Hippocampal function: working memory or cognitive mapping? Phys Psychol 8:239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed AE, Mikels JA, Löckenhoff CE (2013) Preferences for choice across adulthood: age trajectories and potential mechanisms. Psychol Aging 28:625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers WL, Herzog R, Andrews FM (1988) Interviewing older adults: validity of self-reports of satisfaction. Psychol Aging 3:264–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roedder John D, Cole CA (1986) Age differences in information processing: understanding deficits in young and elderly consumers. J Cons Res 13:297–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi N, Isaacowitz DM (2006) What is important to me right now? Age differences in domain selectivity depend on the measure. Ageing Int 31:24–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz MF, Russell DW, Cutrona CE (2002) The validity of self-reports of physician use among the older population. J Appl Geront 21:203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuman H, Presser S (1981) Questions and answers in attitude surveys. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N (1995) What respondents learn from questionnaires: the survey interview and the logic of conversation. Int Stat Rev 63:153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N (1996) Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods and the logic of conversation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N (1999a) Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 54:93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N (1999b) Frequency reports of physical symptoms and health behaviors: How the questionnaire determines the results. In: Park DC, Morrell RW, Shifren K (eds) Processing medical information in aging patients: Cognitive and human factors perspectives. Erlbaum, Mahaw, pp 93–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N (2005) Measurement: Aging and the psychology of self-report. In: Carstensen LL, Hartel CR (eds) When I’m 64: Aging frontiers in social psychology, personality, and adult developmental psychology. National Academic Press, Washington DC, pp 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N, Knäuper B (2000) Cognition, aging, and self-reports. In: Park D, Schwarz N (eds) Cognitive aging: a primer. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, pp 233–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N, Oyserman D (2001) Asking questions about behavior: cognition, communication and questionnaire construction. Am J Eval 22:127–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N, Sudman S (1994) Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports. Springer Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N, Hippler HJ, Deutsch B, Strack F (1985) Response categories: effects on behavioral reports and comparative judgments. Public Opin Quart 49:388–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N, Park D, Knäuper B, Sudman S (eds) (1999) Cognition, aging, and self-reports. Psychology Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Strack F, Martin L (1987) Thinking, judging, and communicating: A process account of context effects in attitude surveys. In: Hippler HJ, Schwarz N, Sudman S (eds) Social information processing and survey methodology. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 123–148s

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strube G (1987) Answering survey questions: The role of memory. In: Hippler HJ, Schwarz N, Sudman S (eds) Social information processing and survey methodology. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 86–101

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sudman S, Bradburn N, Schwarz N (1996) Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau R (1984) Cognitive science and survey methods: a cognitive perspective. In: Jabine T, Straf M, Tanur J, Tourangeau R (eds) Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines. National Academy Press, Washington DC, pp 73–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K (2000) The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau R, Singer E, Presser S (2003) Context effects in attitude surveys: effects on remote items and impact on predictive validity. Soc Methods Res 31:486–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Zouwen J, Smit JH, van der Horst MHL (2005): Reporting the frequency and duration of household tasks by elderly respondents: The effect of different interview strategies on data quality. In: Proceedings of the 60th AAPOR annual conference, May 12–15, 2005, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, pp 4007–4014

  • Yoon C, Feinberg F, Schwarz N (2010) Why do older consumers tell us they are more satisfied? In: Drolet A, Schwarz N, Yoon C (eds) The aging consumer: Perspectives from psychology and economics. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp 209–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelinski EM, Burnight KP (1997) Sixteen-year longitudinal and time-lag changes in memory and cognition in older adults. Psychol Aging 12:503–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    Bärbel Knäuper, Kimberly Carrière & Zhen Xu

  2. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

    Melodie Chamandy

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Norbert Schwarz

  4. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

    Natalie O. Rosen

Authors
  1. Bärbel Knäuper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kimberly Carrière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Melodie Chamandy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhen Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Norbert Schwarz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Natalie O. Rosen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bärbel Knäuper.

Additional information

Responsible editor: D. J. H. Deeg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knäuper, B., Carrière, K., Chamandy, M. et al. How aging affects self-reports. Eur J Ageing 13, 185–193 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0369-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0369-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation