Abstract
Recent evidence suggests negative associations between received social support and emotional well-being. So far, these studies mainly focused on younger adults. Quantity and quality of social support changes with age; therefore, this study investigated whether there are age differences regarding the association between received social support and positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA). Moreover, it was tested whether these age effects might be due to a differential effectiveness of different sources of support for younger and older individuals. Forty-two individuals (21 younger adults, aged 21–40 and 21 older adults, aged 61–73) completed 30-daily diaries on their received social support, PA/NA and the sources of support provision. Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling. Results indicated age-related differential effects: for younger individuals, received social support was negatively associated with indicators of emotional well-being, whereas these associations were positive for older respondents. Regarding NA, these effects held when testing lagged predictions and controlling for previous-day affect. No age differences emerged regarding the associations between different sources of support and indicators of affect. Conceptual implications of these age-differential findings are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeida DM, Wethington E, Kessler RC (2002) The daily inventory of stressful events: an interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment 9(1):41–55
Antonucci TC, Jackson JS (1990) The role of reciprocity in social support. In: Sarason BR, Sarason IG, Pierce GR (eds) Social support: an interactional view. Wiley, New York, pp 173–198
Bolger N, Amarel D (2007) Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: experimental evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 92(3):458–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458
Bolger N, Zuckerman A, Kessler RC (2000) Invisible support and adjustment to stress. J Pers Soc Psychol 79(6):953–961
Carstensen LL, Isaacowitz DM, Charles ST (1999) Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. Am Psychol 54(3):165–181
Charles ST, Reynolds CA, Gatz M (2001) Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(1):136–151
Cohen S (2004) Social relationships and health. Am Psychol 59(8):676–684. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676
Cohen S, Karmarck T, Mermelstein R (1983) A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 24:385–396
Fingerman KL, Miller L, Charles S (2008) Saving the best for last: how adults treat social partners of different ages. Psychol Aging 23(2):399–409. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.399
Fung HH, Carstensen LL (2004) Motivational changes in response to blocked goals and foreshortened time: testing alternatives to socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychol Aging 19(1):68–78. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.682004-11614-007
Graham JW (2009) Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annu Rev Psychol 60:549–576. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
Gross JJ, Carstensen LL, Pasupathi M, Tsai J, Skorpen CG, Hsu AYC (1997) Emotion and aging: experience, expression, and control. Psychol Aging 12(4):590–599
Hays JC, Steffens DC, Flint EP, Bosworth HB, George LK (2001) Does social support buffer functional decline in elderly patients with unipolar depression? Am J Psychiatry 158(11):1850–1855
Keyes CL (2002) The exchange of emotional support with age and its relationship with emotional well-being by age. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 57(6):518–525
Kleiboer AM, Kuijer RG, Hox JJ, Schreurs KMG, Bensing JM (2006) Receiving and providing support in couples dealing with multiple sclerosis: a diary study using an equity perspective. Pers Relatsh 13(4):485–501
Knoll N, Kienle R, Bauer K, Pffueller B, Luszczynska A (2007a) Affect and enacted support in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: when providing is better than receiving. Soc Sci Med 64(9):1789–1801. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.01.004
Knoll N, Rieckmann N, Kienle R (2007b) The other way around: does health predict perceived support? Anxiety Stress Coping 20(1):3–16. doi:10.1080/10615800601032823
Krause N (2005) Exploring age differences in the stress-buffering function of social support. Psychol Aging 20(4):714–717. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.714
Kreft I, DeLeeuw J (1998) Introducing multilevel modeling. SAGE, London
Lang FR (2001) Regulation of social relationships in later adulthood. J Gerontol B 56(6):321–326
Levitt MJ, Weber RA, Guacci N (1993) Convoys of social support: an intergenerational analysis. Psychol Aging 8(3):323–326
Li LW, Liang J (2007) Social exchanges and subjective well-being among older Chinese: does age make a difference? Psychol Aging 22(2):386–391. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.386
Martire LM, Stephens MA, Druley JA, Wojno WC (2002) Negative reactions to received spousal care: predictors and consequences of miscarried support. Health Psychol 21(2):167–176
Norris FH, Kaniasty K (1996) Received and perceived social support in times of stress: a test of the social support deterioration deterrence model. J Pers Soc Psychol 71(3):498–511
Okun MA, Keith VM (1998) Effects of positive and negative social exchanges with various sources on depressive symptoms in younger and older adults. J Gerontol B 53(1):P4–20
Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale. A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. J Appl Psychol Meas 1:385–401
Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models. Application and data analysis methods. SAGE, Thousand Oaks
Rook KS (1984) The negative side of social interaction: impact on psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 46(5):1097–1108
Rook KS (1987) Reciprocity of social-exchange and social satisfaction among older women. J Pers Soc Psychol 52(1):145–154
Sarason IG, Pierce GR, Sarason BR (1990) Social support and interactional processes—a triadic hypothesis. J Soc Pers Relat 7(4):495–506
Schulz U, Schwarzer R (2003) Social support in coping with illness: the Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS). Diagnostica 49(2):73–82. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.49.2.73
Schwarz N (2007) Retrospective and concurrent self-reports: the rationale for real-time data capture. In: Stone AA, Shiffman S, Atienza AA, Nebeling L (eds) The science of real-time data capture self-reports in health research. University Press, Oxford, pp 11–27
Schwarzer R, Knoll N (2010) Social support. In: Kaptein A, Vedhara K, Weinman J (eds) Health psychology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 283–293
Seidman G, Shrout PE, Bolger N (2006) Why is enacted social support associated with increased distress? Using simulation to test two possible sources of spuriousness. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 32(1):52–65. doi:10.1177/0146167205279582
Uchino BN, Cacioppo JT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK (1996) The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychol Bull 119(3):488–531
Walster E, Walster G, Berscheid E (1978) Equity. Allyn & Bacon, Boston
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6):1063–1070
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all students who helped with data collection. While preparing this manuscript, the first author was partly funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (PP00P1_133632/1). The contribution by the third author was supported by the Foundation for Polish Science. Associations between received social support and PA and NA: Evidence for age differences from a daily-diary study
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: H.-W. Wahl.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scholz, U., Kliegel, M., Luszczynska, A. et al. Associations between received social support and positive and negative affect: evidence for age differences from a daily-diary study. Eur J Ageing 9, 361–371 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-012-0236-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-012-0236-6