Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic skills simulator: construct validity and establishment of performance standards for residency training

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Gynecological Surgery

Abstract

Our aim was to test our laparoscopic simulator for construct validity and for establishing performance standards. The skills of laparoscopic novices (n = 18) and advanced gynaecologists (experts, n = 5) were tested on our inanimate simulator by their performance of five tasks. The sum score was the sum of scores of all five tasks. We calculated the scores by adding completion time and penalty points. After baseline evaluation, the novices were assigned to five weekly training sessions (n = 8, training group) or no training (n = 10, control group). Both groups were retested. The experts were tested once, and their performance was compared with the baseline scores of all novices to establish construct validity. The training group improved significantly in all tasks. The final scores of the trained group were significantly better than those of the control group. The training group reached a plateau within seven trials, except for intra-corporeal knot tying. During final testing, the trained group reached the experts’ level of skills on the simulator. We concluded that our simulation model has construct validity. Novices can reach the experts’ basic laparoscopic skills level on the simulator after a short and intense simulator training course. Experts’ basic skills level on the simulator is an achievable performance standard during residency training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darzi A, Mackay S (2002) Recent advances in minimal access surgery. BMJ 423:31–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Maass H, Cakmak HK, Kuehnapfel UG, Germer CT, Bretthauer G, Buhr HJ (2005) A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg 241:442–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and boxtrainers. Is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 18:485–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Derossis AM, Antoniuk M, Fried GM (1999) Evaluation of laparoscopic skills: a 2-year follow-up during residency training. Can J Surg 42:293–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, McClure N (2001) Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 15:1080–1084

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lentz GM, Mandel LS, Lee D, Gardella C, Melville J, Goff BA (2001) Testing surgical skills of obstetrics and gynecologic residents in a bench laboratory setting: validity and reliability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1462–1470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132:200–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scott DJ, Young WN, Tesfay ST, Tesfay ST, Frawley WH, Rege RV, Jones DB (2001) Laparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg 182:137–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fraser SA, Klassen DR, Feldman LS, Ghitulescu GA, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2003) Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg Endosc 17:964–967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W (1997) Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination. Am J Surg 173:226–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91:146–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, Fleming JB, Rege RV, Laycock R, Bergen PC, Tesfay ST, Jones DB (2002) Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 16:406–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin PH, Lonroth H (2002) The transfer of basic skills learning in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 16:1324–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jakimowicz JJ, Cuschieri A (2005) Time for evidence-based minimal access surgery training—simulate or sink. Surg Endosc 19:1521–1522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Korndorffer JR Jr, Clayton JL, Tesfay ST, Brunner WC, Sierra R, Dunne JB, Jones DB, Rege RV, Touchard CL, Scott DJ (2005) Multicenter construct validity for Southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations. J Surg Res 128:114–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175(6):482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R, Touchard C, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2005) Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 138:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Markley S, Sierra R, Scott DJ (2006) Proficiency maintenance: impact of ongoing simulator training on laparoscopic skill retention. J Am Coll Surg 2024:599–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Torkington J, Smith SG, Rees B, Darzi A (2001) The role of the basic laparoscopic skills course in the acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skill. Surg Endosc 15:1071–1075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the students and gynaecologists for participating in our study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, K6-76, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands

    W. Kolkman, M. A. J. van de Put, J. B. M. Z. Trimbos & F. W. Jansen

  2. Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

    R. Wolterbeek

Authors
  1. W. Kolkman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. J. van de Put
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Wolterbeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. B. M. Z. Trimbos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. W. Jansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. W. Jansen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolkman, W., van de Put, M.A.J., Wolterbeek, R. et al. Laparoscopic skills simulator: construct validity and establishment of performance standards for residency training. Gynecol Surg 5, 109–114 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-007-0345-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-007-0345-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation