Abstract
According to the mental number line (MNL) concept, people mentally represent numbers along a line with smaller values on the left and greater on the right. Embodied cognition theory assumes that MNL is activated by postural bias and in turn affects cognitive processes; for example, research shows that quantitative estimates are smaller when participants’ bodies are leaning to the left than to the right. In this study, we tested whether distance estimation in the natural environment is influenced by head rotation. Outdoors, participants gave verbal reports about egocentric distances while keeping their head turned left, turned right, or in the straight-ahead position. Results showed that distance estimates were greater when participants rotated their head right as compared to left. Additionally, we tested whether the MNL is activated by camera-based image movement indicating that the camera is rotating left or right. Participants estimated distances in videos recorded with camera rotation, and the videos were viewed without any postural bias; estimates were similar for camera rotating left and right. The study thus demonstrates that proprioceptive information seems to be necessary for activation of the MNL, which in turn influences verbal distance estimation in the outdoor space.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andres M, Davare M, Pesenti M, Olivier E, Seron X (2004) Number magnitude and grip aperture interaction. NeuroReport 15(18):2773–2777
Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59:617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Bhalla M, Proffitt DR (1999) Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1076–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1076
Boroditsky L, Ramscar M (2002) The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychol Sci 13(2):185–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00434
Cacioppo JT, Priester JR, Berntson GG (1993) Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. J Personal Soc Psychol 65(1):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5
Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. J Exp Psychol Gen 122(3):371–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
Dehaene S, Piazza M, Pinel P, Cohen L (2003) Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cogn Neuropsychol 20(3–6):487–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000239
Dijkstra K, Kaschak MP, Zwaan RA (2007) Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition 102:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.009
Dijkstra K, Eerland A, Zijlmans J, Post LS (2012) How body balance influences political party evaluations: A Wii balance board study. Front Psychol 3:536. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00536
Eerland A, Guadalupe TM, Zwaan RA (2011) Leaning to the left makes the Eiffel tower seem smaller. Psychol Sci 22(12):1511–1514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611420731
Firestone C (2013) How “paternalistic” is spatial perception? Why wearing a heavy backpack doesn’t—and couldn’t—make hills look steeper. Perspect Psychol Sci 8(4):455–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613489835
Fischer MH, Castel AD, Dodd MD, Pratt J (2003) Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nat Neurosci 6(6):555–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1066
Flannagan MJ, Sivak M, Simpson JK (2001) The role of binocular information for distance perception in rear-vision systems. (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 2001-01-0322). Society of Automative Engineers, Warrendale, Pennsylvania. https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0322
Glenberg AM, Kaschak MP (2003) The body’s contribution to language. In: Ross B (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol 43. Elsevier Science, New York, pp 93–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(03)01012-0
Goldinger SD, Papesh MH, Barnhart AS, Hansen WA, Hout MC (2016) The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 23(4):959–978. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0860-1
Hartmann M, Grabherr L, Mast FW (2012) Moving along the mental number line: interactions between whole-body motion and numerical cognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 38(6):1416–1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026706
Hubbard EM, Piazza M, Pinel P, Dehaene S (2005) Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(6):435–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1684
Loetscher T, Schwarz U, Schubiger M, Brugger P (2008) Head turns bias the brain’s internal random generator. Curr Biol 18(2):R60–R62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.015
Loftus AM, Nicholls MER, Mattingley JB, Chapman HL, Bradshaw JL (2009) Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines. Q J Exp Psychol 62(5):925–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802305318
Loomis JM, Knapp JM (2003) Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In: Hettinger LJ, Hass MW (eds) Virtual and adaptive environments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 21–46
Loomis JM, da Silva JA, Fujita N, Fukusima SS (1992) Visual space perception and visually directed action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18(4):906–921. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.906
Mahon BZ (2015) The burden of embodied cognition. Can J Exp Psychol 69(2):172–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000060
Nicholls MER, McIlroy AM (2010) Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections. Exp Psychol 57(4):315–319. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000037
Nicholls MER, Loftus AM, Gevers W (2008) Look, no hands: a perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention. Psychon Bull Rev 15(2):413–418. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.15.2.413
Pollatsek A, Well AD (1995) On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21(3):785–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.785
Proffitt DR (2006) Distance perception. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15(3):131–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00422.x
Proffitt DR (2013) An embodied approach to perception. Perspect Psychol Sci 8(4):474–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613489837
Proffitt DR, Stefanucci J, Banton T, Epstein W (2003) The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychol Sci 14(2):106–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01427
Restle F (1970) Speed of adding and comparing numbers. J Exp Psychol 83:274–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028573
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131
Walsh V (2003) A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends Cogn Sci 7(11):483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9(4):625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
Witt JK, Proffitt DR, Epstein W (2005) Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31(5):880–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.880
Wołoszyn K, Hohol M (2017) Commentary: the poverty of embodied cognition. Front Psychol 8:845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00845
Wood G, Willmes K, Nuerk HC, Fischer MH (2008) On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychol Sci 50(4):489–525
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Handling editor: Daniele Nardi (Ball State University);
Reviewers: two researchers who prefer to remain anonymous.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Styrkowiec, P.P., Jurczyk, A. & Łepek, B. Do not turn your head when estimating the distance: influence of head rotation on distance judgement. Cogn Process 21, 55–64 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00944-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00944-9