Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence of SQUARC and distance effects in a weight comparison task

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stimuli associated with large quantities are typically responded to faster with a right- than a left-side key, whereas stimuli associated with small quantities are typically responded to faster with a left- than a right-side key. This phenomenon is known as the spatial-quantity association of response codes (SQUARC) effect. Here, in two experiments, we explored whether a SQUARC effect can emerge for light versus heavy items. Participants judged whether the weight associated with a central target word, describing an animal (e.g. ‘cow’; Experiment 1) or a material (e.g. ‘iron’; Experiment 2), was lighter or heavier than the weight associated with a reference word. Responses were provided with a left- and a right-side button. Then, participants estimated the weight associated with target and reference words. In both experiments, evidence for a SQUARC effect emerged. Moreover, response times for each target word decreased with absolute difference between its rated weight and the rated weight of the reference word, in line with a distance effect. Overall, these results provide evidence of a possible spatial representation of weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Even if in English the word ‘light’ may refer not just to lightness in weight, but also to lightness in colour, in Italian there is no obvious confounding for words related to weight and words related to other physical dimensions. For instance, there is no confounding between the Italian words ‘leggero’ (light in weight) and ‘chiaro’ (light in colour).

  2. The SNARC effect is frequently tested by computing, for each number stimulus, the mean RT difference between the right- and the left-side key, and then by testing the existence of a negative correlation between number magnitudes and mean RT difference (see Fias et al. 1996). Theoretically, this approach could also be used in the current context by using the mean rated weight of the stimuli instead of number magnitude. However, when magnitude is task relevant as in our study (see the general discussion), the mean RT difference is not a linear but a categorical function of magnitude, which implies the violation of one basic assumptions of linear regression analysis (see Gevers et al. 2006).

  3. Please note that anchors and target words belonged to different categories (i.e. objects vs. materials, respectively). For the sake of reliability of the rating scale, the weight implied by the two anchors should be represented similarly among participants, and we reasoned that this was more easily achieved by using familiar objects instead of materials.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Martin Fischer and two reviewers for valuable suggestions on a former version of the manuscript. We also thank and S. Gareth Edwards for his valuable comments. Original materials used to conduct the research will be made available upon request. Raw data can be downloaded from here: https://osf.io/7r9bd/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Vicovaro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were approved by the Ethics Committee for Psychological Research at the University of Padova, and were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The strength of the SQUARC effect was computed through the following equation:

$${\text{SQE}}_{i} =\left[ {{\text{RT}}_{i} \left( {{\text{heavy}},{\text{left}}} \right) - {\text{RT}}_{i} \left( {{\text{heavy}},{\text{right}}} \right)} \right]{\text{ }} +\left[ {{\text{RT}}_{i} \left( {{\text{light}},{\text{right}}} \right) - {\text{RT}}_{i} \left( {{\text{light}},{\text{left}}} \right)} \right]$$

where SQEi stands for the strength of the SQUARC effect for the ith participant. RTi(heavy, left) and RTi(heavy, right) stand for the average RTs for the ith participant when she/he responded to ‘heavier’ target words with the left-side key and the right-side key, respectively. RTi(light, right) and RTi(light, left) stand for the average RTs for the ith participant when she/he responded to ‘lighter’ target words with the right-side key and the left-side key, respectively. The SQEi increases with the strength of the association between ‘heavier’ (‘lighter’) words and the right-side (left-side) response. A negative SQEi would indicate the presence of an inverted SQUARC effect.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dalmaso, M., Vicovaro, M. Evidence of SQUARC and distance effects in a weight comparison task. Cogn Process 20, 163–173 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00905-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00905-2

Keywords

Navigation