Skip to main content
Log in

Non-musicians also have a piano in the head: evidence for spatial–musical associations from line bisection tracking

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spatial representation of ordinal sequences (numbers, time, tones) seems to be a fundamental cognitive property. While an automatic association between horizontal space and pitch height (left-low pitch, right-high pitch) is constantly reported in musicians, the evidence for such an association in non-musicians is mixed. In this study, 20 non-musicians performed a line bisection task while listening to irrelevant high- and low-pitched tones and white noise (control condition). While pitch height had no influence on the final bisection point, participants’ movement trajectories showed systematic biases: When approaching the line and touching the line for the first time (initial bisection point), the mouse cursor was directed more rightward for high-pitched tones compared to low-pitched tones and noise. These results show that non-musicians also have a subtle but nevertheless automatic association between pitch height and the horizontal space. This suggests that spatial–musical associations do not necessarily depend on constant sensorimotor experiences (as it is the case for musicians) but rather reflect the seemingly inescapable tendency to represent ordinal information on a horizontal line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59:617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonato M, Zorzi M, Umilta C (2012) When time is space: evidence for a mental time line. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36(10):2257–2273. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie EE, Pettigrew LEL (1996) Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction. Neuropsychologia 34(5):467–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calabria M, Rossetti Y (2005) Interference between number processing and line bisection: a methodology. Neuropsychologia 43(5):779–783. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chang S, Cho YS (2015) Polarity correspondence effect between loudness and lateralized response set. Front Psychol 6:683

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cho YS, Bae GY, Proctor RW (2012) Referential coding contributes to the horizontal SMARC effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 38:726–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coello Y, Fischer MH (2016) Foundations of embodied cognition—Volume 1. Perceptual and emotional embodiment. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling S, Logie RH, Della Sala S (2012) Representational pseudoneglect in line bisection. Psychon Bull Rev 19(5):879–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Hevia MD, Izard V, Coubart A, Spelke ES, Streri A (2014) Representations of space, time, and number in neonates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(13):4809–4813

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. J Exp Psychol Gen 122(3):371–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MH (2001) Number processing induces spatial performance biases. Neurology 57(5):822–826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MH, Coello Y (2016) Foundations of embodied cognition—Volume 2: conceptual and interactive embodiment. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MH, Hartmann M (2014) Pushing forward in embodied cognition: may we mouse the mathematical mind? Front Psychol 5:1–4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01315

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MH, Shaki S (2014) Spatial associations in numerical cognition—from single digits to arithmetic. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 67(8):1461–1483. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.927515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MH, Riello M, Giordano BL, Rusconi E (2013) Singing numbers… in cognitive space—a dual-task study of the link between pitch, space, and numbers. Top Cognit Sci 5:354–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman J, Dale R, Farmer T (2011) Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Front Psychol 2:59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers W, Reynvoet B, Fias W (2003) The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition 87(3):B87–B95. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00234-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers W, Reynvoet B, Fias W (2004) The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organised: evidence from days of the week. Cortex 40(1):171–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel SM, Shaki S, Fischer MH (2011) The cultural number line: a review of cultural and linguistic influences on the development of number processing. J Cross Cult Psychol 42(4):543–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann M, Mast FW (2016) Loudness counts: interactions between loudness, number magnitude and space. Q J Exp Psychol. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1182194

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann M, Martarelli CS, Mast FW, Stocker K (2014) Eye movements during mental time travel follow a diagonal line. Conscious Cogn 30C:201–209. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann M, Mast FW, Fischer MH (2015) Spatial biases during mental arithmetic: evidence from eye movements on a blank screen. Front Psychol 6:12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haslbeck JM, Wood G, Witte M (2016) Temporal dynamics of number-space interaction in line bisection: comment on Cleland and Bull (2015). Q J Exp Psychol 69(6):1239–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara M, Revol P, Jacquin-Courtois S, Mayet R, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y (2013) Tonal cues modulate line bisection performance: preliminary evidence for a new rehabilitation prospect. Front Psychol 4:704

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell G, McCourt ME (2000) Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38(1):93–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lega C, Cattaneo Z, Merabet LB, Vecchi T, Cucchi S (2014) The effect of musical expertise on the representation of space. Front Hum Neurosci 8:1–9. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidji P, Kolinsky R, Lochy A, Morais J (2007) Spatial associations for musical stimuli: a piano in the head? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33(5):1189–1207. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura A, Yokosawa K (2009) Effects of laterality and pitch height of an auditory accessory stimulus on horizontal response selection: The Simon effect and the SMARC effect. Psychon Bull Rev 16(4):666–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce JW (2007) PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python. J Neurosci Methods 162(1):8–13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pitteri M, Marchetti M, Priftis K, Grassi M (2015) Naturally together: pitch-height and brightness as coupled factors for eliciting the SMARC effect in non-musicians. Psychol Res. doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0713-6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor RW, Cho YS (2006) Polarity correspondence: a general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychol Bull 132:416–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi L, Lega C, Cattaneo Z, Girelli L, Bernardi NF (2016) Grasping the sound: auditory pitch influences size processing in motor planning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 42(1):11–22. doi:10.1037/xhp0000120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rusconi E, Kwan B, Giordano BL, Umilta C, Butterworth B (2006) Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect. Cognition 99(2):113–129. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spivey MJ, Grosjean M, Knoblich G (2005) Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(29):10393–10398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart L, Verdonschot RG, Nasralla P, Lanipekun J (2013) Action–perception coupling in pianists: learned mappings or spatial musical association of response codes (SMARC) effect? Q J Exp Psychol 66(1):37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmers R, Li S (2016) Representation of pitch in horizontal space and its dependence on musical and instrumental experience. Psychomusicol: Music Mind Brain 26:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich R, Maienborn C (2010) Left-right coding of past and future in language: the mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition 117(2):126–138. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weis T, Estner B, Lachmann T (2016) When speech enhances spatial musical association of response codes: joint spatial associations of pitch and timbre in nonmusicians. Q J Exp Psychol 69:1687–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Hartmann.

Additional information

Handling editor: Marta Olivetti (Sapienza University of Rome); Reviewers: Tina Weis (University of Kaiserslautern), Yang Seok Cho (Korea University).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartmann, M. Non-musicians also have a piano in the head: evidence for spatial–musical associations from line bisection tracking. Cogn Process 18, 75–80 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0779-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0779-0

Keywords

Navigation