Abstract
Numerical and spatial representations are tightly linked, i.e., when doing a binary classification judgment on Arabic digits, participants are faster to respond with their left/right hand to small/large numbers, respectively (Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes, SNARC effect, Dehaene et al. in J Exp Psychol Gen 122:371–396, 1993). To understand the underlying mechanisms of the well-established SNARC effect, it seems essential to explore the considerable inter-individual variability characterizing it. The present study assesses the respective roles of inhibition, age, working memory (WM) and response speed. Whereas these non-numerical factors have been proposed as potentially important factors to explain individual differences in SNARC effects, none (except response speed) has so far been explored directly. Confirming our hypotheses, the results show that the SNARC effect was stronger in participants that had weaker inhibition abilities (as assessed by the Stroop task), were relatively older and had longer response times. Interestingly, whereas a significant part of the age influence was mediated by cognitive inhibition, age also directly impacted the SNARC effect. Similarly, cognitive inhibition abilities explained inter-individual variability in number–space associations over and above the factors age, WM capacity and response speed. Taken together our results provide new insights into the nature of number–space associations by describing how these are influenced by the non-numerical factors age and inhibition.
Notes
This factor can be numerical or non-numerical according to the SNARC paradigms that are being used (i.e. parity judgment, magnitude comparison vs. orientation, color judgment, phoneme detection, vowel/consonant judgment).
We thank Prof. Joseph Tzelgov for his opinion on a related matter.
Welch F ratios have been computed in the case of violation of the homogeneity of variance assumption.
Throughout the analyses, the Greenhouse–Geisser correction is applied where appropriate.
References
Andrés P, Guerrini C, Phillips LH, Perfect TJ (2008) Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition. Dev Neuropsychol 33:101–123
Arnaud L, Lemaire P, Allen P, Michel BF (2008) Strategic aspects of young, healthy older adults’, and Alzheimer patients’ arithmetic performance. Cortex 44:119–130
Bäumler G (1985) Farb-Wort-Interferenztest (FWIT) nach J.R.Stroop. Hogrefe, Göttingen
Berg EA (1948) A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J Gen Psychol 39:15–22
Bialystok E, Craik FI, Klein R, Viswanathan M (2004) Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. Psychol Aging 19:290–303
Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108:624–652
Bull R, Cleland AA, Mitchell T (2013) Sex differences in the spatial representation of number. J Exp Psychol Gen 142:181–192
Cerella J (1985) Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychol Bull 98:67–83
Cipora K, Nuerk HC (2013) Is the SNARC effect related to the level of mathematics? No systematic relationship observed despite more power, more repetitions, and more direct assessment of arithmetic skill. Q J Exp Psychol. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.772215
Coles MG (1989) Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology 26:251–269
Craft JL, Simon JR (1970) Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. J Exp Psychol 83:415–420
De Hevia MD, Vallar G, Girelli L (2008) Visualizing numbers in the mind’s eye: the role of visuo-spatial processes in numerical abilities. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:1361–1372
De Jong R, Liang CC, Lauber E (1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:731–750
Dehaene S, Dupoux E, Mehler J (1990) Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:626–641
Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. J Exp Psychol Gen 122:371–396
Di Luca S, Granà A, Semenza C, Seron X, Pesenti M (2006) Finger-digit compatibility in Arabic numeral processing. Q J Exp Psychol 59:1648–1663
Di Luca S, Pesenti M, Vallar G, Girelli L (2013) Numbers reorient visuo-spatial attention during cancellation tasks. Exp Brain Res 225:549–557
Dormal V, Grade S, Mormont E, Pesenti M (2012) Dissociation between numerosity and duration processing in aging and early Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 50:2365–2370
Duncan-Johnson CC, Kopell BS (1981) The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science 214:938–940
Egner T, Delano M, Hirsch J (2007) Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. Neuroimage 35:940–948
Fabiani M (2012) It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: a psychophysiologist’s view of cognitive aging. Psychophysiology 49:283–304
Fias W, Brysbaert M, Geypens F, d’ Ydewalle G (1996) The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: evidence from the SNARC effect. Math Cogn 2:95–110
Fias W, van Dijck JP, Gevers W (2011) How number is associated with space? The role of working memory. In: Dehaene S, Brannon E (eds) Space, time and number in the brain : searching for the foundations of mathematical thought. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 133–148
Fischer MH (2008) Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex 44:386–392
Fischer MH, Castel AD, Dodd MD, Pratt J (2003) Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nat Neurosci 6:555–556
Floden D, Vallesi A, Stuss DT (2011) Task context and frontal lobe activation in the Stroop task. J Cogn Neurosci 23:867–879
Gandini D, Lemaire P, Dufau S (2008) Older and younger adults’ strategies in approximate quantification. Acta Psychol 129:175–189
Gandini D, Lemaire P, Michel BF (2009) Approximate quantification in young, healthy older adults’, and Alzheimer patients. Brain Cogn 70:53–61
Gevers W, Caessens B, Fias W (2005) Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects. Eur J Cogn Psychol 17:659–673
Gevers W, Lammertyn J, Notebaert W, Verguts T, Fias W (2006a) Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: evidence from the SNARC effect. Acta Psychol 122:221–233
Gevers W, Ratinckx E, De Baene W, Fias W (2006b) Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Exp Psychol 53:58–68
Gevers W, Verguts T, Reynvoet B, Caessens B, Fias W (2006c) Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32:32–44
Gevers W, Santens S, Dhooge E, Chen Q, Van den Bossche L, Fias W, Verguts T (2010) Verbal–spatial and visuospatial coding of number–space interactions. J Exp Psychol Gen 139:180–190
Girelli L, Sandrini M, Cappa S, Butterworth B (2001) Number-Stroop performance in normal aging and Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Brain Cogn 46:144–149
Godefroy O, Azouvi P, Robert P, Roussel M, LeGall D, Meulemans T, Groupe de Réflexion sur l’Evaluation des Fonctions Exécutives Study Group (2010) Dysexecutive syndrome: diagnostic criteria and validation study. Ann Neurol 68:855–864
Gratton G, Coles MG, Sirevaag EJ, Eriksen CW, Donchin E (1988) Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:331–344
Green HJ, Lemaire P, Dufau S (2007) Eye movement correlates of younger and older adults’ strategies for complex addition. Acta Psychol 125:257–278
Gutchess AH, Kensinger EA, Schacter DL (2007) Aging, self-referencing, and medial prefrontal cortex. Soc Neurosci 2:117–133
Halberda J, Ly R, Wilmer JB, Naiman DQ, Germine L (2012) Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive internet-based sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:11116–11120
Hallett PE (1978) Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Res 18:1279–1296
Hasher L, Zacks RT (1988) Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press, New York, pp 193–225
Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New York
Herrera A, Macizo P, Semenza C (2008) The role of working memory in the association between number magnitude and space. Acta Psychol 128:225–237
Hoffmann D, Mussolin C, Martin R, Schiltz C (2014) The impact of mathematical proficiency on the number–space association. PLoS ONE 9(1):e85048 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085048
Hommel B (2011) The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychol 136:189–202
Ilan AB, Polich J (1999) P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task. Clin Neurophysiol 110:367–373
Keus IM, Jenks KM, Schwarz W (2005) Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 24:48–56
Kok A (1999) Varieties of inhibition: manifestations in cognition, event-related potentials and aging. Acta Psychol 101:129–158
Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97:253–270
Lorch RF Jr, Myers JL (1990) Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 16:149–157
MacLeod CM (1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull 109:163–203
Mapelli D, Rusconi E, Umiltà C (2003) The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? Cognition 88:B1–10
Masaki H, Takasawa N, Yamazaki K (2000) An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. Psychophysiology 37:464–472
Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 41:49–100
Moyer RS, Landauer TK (1967) Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature 215:1519–1520
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H (2005) The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:695–699
Nicoletti R, Umiltà C (1994) Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychol Res 56:144–150
Nigg JT (2000) On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychol Bull 126:220–246
Notebaert W, Gevers W, Verguts T, Fias W (2006) Shared spatial representations for numbers and space: the reversal of the SNARC and the Simon effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32:1197–1207
Nuerk HC, Iversen W, Willmes K (2004) Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. Q J Exp Psychol 57:835–863
Park DC, Lautenschlager G, Hedden T, Davidson NS, Smith AD, Smith PK (2002) Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging 17:299–320
Peterson BS, Kane MJ, Alexander GM, Lacadie C, Skudlarski P, Leung HC, May J, Gore JC (2002) An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 13:427–440
Pinhas M, Tzelgov J, Ganor-Stern D (2012) Estimating linear effects in ANOVA designs: the easy way. Behav Res Methods 44:788–794
Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res 42:185–227
Previtali P, de Hevia MD, Girelli L (2010) Placing order in space: the SNARC effect in serial learning. Exp Brain Res 201:599–605
Proctor RW, Cho YS (2006) Polarity correspondence: a general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychol Bull 132:416–442
Puccioni O, Vallesi A (2012) Conflict resolution and adaptation in normal aging: the role of verbal intelligence and cognitive reserve. Psychol Aging 27:1018–1026
Restle F (1970) Speed of adding and comparing numbers. J Exp Psychol 83:274–278
Rusconi E, Umiltà C, Galfano G (2006) Breaking ranks: space and number may march to the beat of a different drum. Cortex 42:1124–1127
Rusconi E, Turatto M, Umiltà C (2007) Two orienting mechanisms in posterior parietal lobule: an rTMS study of the Simon and SNARC effects. Cogn Neuropsychol 24:373–392
Salthouse TA, Coon VE (1994) Interpretation of differential deficits: the case of aging and mental arithmetic. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20:1172–1182
Salthouse TA, Hedden T (2002) Interpreting reaction time measures in between-group comparisons. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 24:858–872
Schneider W, Eschmann A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-prime user’s guide. Psychology Software Tools Inc, Pittsburgh
Shaki S, Fischer MH, Petrusic WM (2009) Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychon Bull Rev 16:328–331
Simon JR (1969) Reactions toward the source of stimulation. J Exp Psychol 81:174–176
Simon JR, Berbaum K (1990) Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the “Stroop effect” vs. the “Simon effect”. Acta Psychol 73:159–170
Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643–662
Szucs D, Soltész F, Bryce D, Whitebread D (2009) Real-time tracking of motor response activation and response competition in a Stroop task in young children: a lateralized readiness potential study. J Cogn Neurosci 21:2195–2206
Thevenot C, Castel C, Danjon J, Fanget M, Fayol M (2013) The use of the operand-recognition paradigm for the study of mental addition in older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 68:64–67
Treccani B, Milanese N, Umiltà C (2010) Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36:1239–1254
Tschentscher N, Hauk O, Fischer MH, Pulvermüller F (2012) You can count on the motor cortex: finger counting habits modulate motor cortex activation evoked by numbers. Neuroimage 59:3139–3148
Tzelgov J, Zohar-Shai B, Nuerk HC (2013) On defining quantifying and measuring the SNARC effect. Front Psychol. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00302
Valle-Inclán F (1996) The locus of interference in the Simon effect: an ERP study. Biol Psychol 43:147–162
Vallesi A, Stuss DT (2010) Excessive sub-threshold motor preparation for non-target stimuli in normal aging. Neuroimage 50:1251–1257
Vallesi A, McIntosh AR, Stuss DT (2009a) Temporal preparation in aging: a functional MRI study. Neuropsychologia 47:2876–2881
Vallesi A, Stuss DT, McIntosh AR, Picton TW (2009b) Age-related differences in processing irrelevant information: evidence from event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia 47:577–586
Vallesi A, McIntosh AR, Stuss DT (2011) Overrecruitment in the aging brain as a function of task demands: evidence for a compensatory view. J Cogn Neurosci 23:801–815
Van der Lubbe RHJ, Verleger R (2002) Aging and the Simon task. Psychophysiology 39:100–110
Van Dijck JP, Fias W (2011) A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations. Cognition 119:114–119
Van Dijck JP, Gevers W, Fias W (2009) Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task. Cognition 113:248–253
Verbruggen F, Logan GD, Stevens MA (2008) STOP-IT: windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm. Behav Res Methods 40:479–483
Wechsler D (1997) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd edn. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio
West RL (1996) An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychol Bull 120:272–292
Wood G, Nuerk HC, Willmes K (2006a) Variability of the SNARC effect: systematic interindividual differences or just random error? Cortex 42:1119–1123
Wood G, Nuerk HC, Willmes K (2006b) Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: a failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993). Cortex 42:1069–1079 discussion 1119–1123
Wood G, Willmes K, Nuerk HC, Fischer MH (2008) On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychol Sci Q 50:489–525
Zhang HH, Zhang J, Kornblum S (1999) A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus–stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. Cogn Psychol 38:386–432
Zimmermann P, Fimm B (2007) Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung Version 2.1. Herzogenrath, Psytest
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by a Grant from the University of Luxembourg F3R-EMA-PUL-09NSP2. The first-named author was supported by a PHD-AFR grant from the Fond National de la Recherche, Luxembourg (PHD-09-160).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoffmann, D., Pigat, D. & Schiltz, C. The impact of inhibition capacities and age on number–space associations. Cogn Process 15, 329–342 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0601-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0601-9