Abstract
The aim of this study is to broaden our understanding of the construction and early decline of spatial mental representations in route learning, considering the extent to which spatial ability and age-related differences in environment learning interact. The experiment examines spatial mental representation derived from taking a realistic route acquired using virtual environment and compares individuals different in age but with similar spatial ability. A sample of 34 young (20–30 years) and 30 middle-aged (50–60 years) females with good mental rotation ability were chosen. Participants learned a complex route through its presentation in a virtual environment and then performed a series of tasks (landmark recognition, location of landmarks and verification of spatial relations). Results show that the two participant age groups had similar performance in landmark recognition task and in verification of sentences describing direct spatial relations; instead, the middle-aged group showed a poorer performance than younger in their ability to locate landmarks and to judge the truth of indirect spatial sentences. These results first suggest that spatial abilities have to be seriously considered to avoid any confusion with age, as age-related differences are attenuated when individuals are different in age but similar in spatial ability. Second they confirm a specific difficulty of older participants to handle spatial information in a global configuration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Allen GL, Kirasic KC, Dobson SH, Long RG, Beck S (1996) Predicting environmental learning from spatial abilities: an indirect route. Intelligence 22:327–355
Avraamides M, Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Golledge RG (2004) Functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from vision and language: evidence from allocentric judgments. J Exp Psychol Learn 30:801–814
Caplan LJ, Lipman PD (1995) Age and gender differences in the effectiveness of map-like learning aids in memory for routes. J Gerontol 50:126–133
Carretti B, Mammarella IC, Borella E (2012) Age differences in proactive interference in verbal and visuo-spatial working memory. J Cogn Psychol 3:243–355
De Beni R, Pazzaglia F, Gardini S (2006) The role of mental rotation and age in spatial perspective taking tasks: when age does not impair perspective-taking performance. Appl Cognit Psych 20:807–821
Fields AW, Shelton AL (2006) Individual skill differences and large-scale environmental learning. J Exp Psychol Learn 32:506–515
Hegarty M, Montello DR, Richardson AE, Ishikawa T, Lovelace K (2006) Spatial abilities at different scales: individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence 34:151–176
Iaria G, Palermo L, Committeri G, Barton JJ (2009) Age differences in the formation and use of cognitive maps. Behav Brain Res 196:187–191
Jansen P, Schmelter A, Heil M (2010) Spatial knowledge acquisition in younger and elderly adults. A study in a virtual environment. Exp Psychol 57:54–60
Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Kirasic KC (1991) Spatial cognition and behaviour in young and elderly adults: implications for learning new environments. Psychol Aging 6:10–18
Kirasic KC (2000) Age differences in adults’ spatial abilities, learning environmental layout, and wayfinding behaviour. Spat Cogn Comput 2:117–134
Klencklen G, Desprès O, Dufour A (2012) What do we know about aging and spatial cognition? Reviews and perspectives. Aging Res Rev 11:123–135
Linn MC, Petersen AC (1985) Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 56:1479–1498
Lohman DF (1979) Spatial ability: a review and reanalysis of the correlational literature (Tech. Rep. No. 8). Stanford University School of Education, Stanford, CA
Lövdén M, Schellenbach M, Grossman-Hutter B, Krüger A, Lindenberger U (2005) Environmental topography and postural control demands shape aging-associated decrements in spatial navigation performance. Psychol Aging 20:683–694
Meneghetti C, De Beni R, Pazzaglia F, Gyselinck V (2011) The role of visuo-spatial abilities in recall of spatial descriptions: a mediation model. Learn Individ differ 21:719–723
Meneghetti C, Borella E, Gyselinck V, De Beni R (2012) Age-differences in environment route learning: the role of input and recall-test modalities in young and older adults. Learn Individ Differ 22:884–890
Moffat SD, Zonderman AB, Resnick SM (2001) Age differences in spatial memory in a virtual environment navigation task. Neurobiol Aging 22:787–796
Park DC, Lautenschlager G, Hedden T, Davidson NS, Smith AD, Smith PK (2002) Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging 17:299–320
Pazzaglia F, De Beni R (2001) Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals. Eur J Cogn Psychol 13:493–508
Pazzaglia F, De Beni R (2006) Are people with high and low mental rotation abilities differently susceptible to the alignment effect? Perception 35:369–383
Pazzaglia F, Cornoldi C, De Beni R (2000) Differenze individuali nella rappresentazione dello spazio: presentazione di un questionario autovalutativo [Individual differences in representation of space: presentation of questionnaire]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 3:627–650
Pazzaglia F, Gyselinck V, Cornoldi C, De Beni R (2012) Individual differences in spatial text processing. In: Gyselinck V, Pazzaglia F (eds) From mental imagery to spatial cognition and language. In honor of Michel Denis Psychology Press, Hove, pp 127–161
Perri R, Serra L, Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C (2007) Amnestic mild cognitive impairment: difference of memory profile in subjects who converted or did not convert to Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology 21:549–558
Plancher G, Gyselinck V, Nicolas S, Piolino P (2010) Age effect on components of episodic memory and feature binding: a virtual reality study. Neuropsychology 24:379–390
Richardson AE, Montello DR, Hegarty M (1999) Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Mem Cognit 27:741–750
Shelton AL, Gabrieli JDE (2004) Neural correlates of individual differences in spatial learning strategies. Neuropsychology 18:442–449
Sjolinder M, Hook K, Nilsson LG, Andersson G (2005) Age differences and the acquisition of spatial knowledge in a threedimensional environment: evaluating the use of an overview map as a navigation aid international. J Hum Comput Stud 63:537–564
Taylor HA, Tversky B (1992) Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. J Mem Lang 31:261–292
Tom AC, Tversky B (2012) Remembering routes: streets and landmarks. Appl Cognit Psychol 26:182–193
Vandenberg SG, Kuse AR (1978) Mental rotations, a group test of threedimensional spatial visualization. Percept Motor Skill 47:599–604
Wechsler D (1981) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised (WAIS-R). The Psychological Corporation, New York
Wilkniss SM, Jones MG, Korol DL, Gold PE, Manning CA (1997) Age-related differences in an ecologically based study of route learning. Psychol Aging 12:372–375
Wolbers T, Hegarty M (2010) What determines our navigational abilities? Trends Cogn Sci 14:138–146
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Christelle Lemoine for her help in configuring the E-Prime software.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gyselinck, V., Meneghetti, C., Bormetti, M. et al. Considering spatial ability in virtual route learning in early aging. Cogn Process 14, 309–316 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0557-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0557-1