Skip to main content
Log in

Explaining sex differences in mental rotation: role of spatial activity experience

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Males consistently outperform females on mental rotation tasks, such as the Vandenberg and Kuse (1978) Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604, mental rotation test (MRT; e.g. Voyer et al. 1995) in Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–265. The present study investigates whether these sex differences in MRT scores can be explained in part by early spatial activity experience, particularly those spatial activities that have been sex-typed as masculine/male-oriented. Utilizing an online survey, 571 ethnically diverse adult university students completed a brief demographic survey, an 81-item spatial activity survey, and the MRT. Results suggest that the significant relation between sex of the participant and MRT score is partially mediated by the number of masculine spatial activities participants had engaged in as youth. Closing the gap between males and females in spatial ability, a skill linked to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics success, may be accomplished in part by encouraging female youth to engage in more particular kinds of spatial activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Baenninger M, Newcombe N (1989) The role of experience in spatial test performance: a meta-analysis. Sex Roles 20(5–6):327–344. doi:10.1007/BF00287729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baenninger M, Newcombe N (1995) Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learn Individ Differ 7(4):363–379. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(95)90007-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin SJC, Hoffman HA (1988) Evolution and development of sex differences in spatial ability. In: Betzig L, Borgerhoff Mulder M, Turke P (eds) Human reproductive behaviour: a Darwinian perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Halari R, Hines M, Kumari V, Mehrotra R, Wheeler M, Ng V, Sharma T (2005) Sex differences and individual differences in cognitive performance and their relationship to endogenous gonadal hormones and gonadotropins. Behav Neurosci 119(1):104–117. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.119.1.104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann M, Slabbekoorn D, Van Goozen SHM, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Güntürkün O (2000) Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle. Behav Neurosci 114:1245–1250. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.114.6.1245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty M, Waller D (2004) A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence 32:175–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugdahl K, Thomsen T, Ersland L (2006) Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: an fMRI study of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia 44(9):1575–1583. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linn MC, Petersen AC (1985) Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 56(6):1479–1498. doi:10.2307/1130467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman DF (1996) Spatial ability and G. In: Dennis I, Tapsfield P (eds) Human abilities: their nature and assessment. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 97–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski D (2010) Spatial ability and STEM: a sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Pers Individ Dif 49:344–351. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN (1974) The psychology of sex differences. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe NS (2010) Picture this: increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. Am Educ 8:29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe N, Bandura MM, Taylor DG (1983) Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles 9(3):377–386. doi:10.1007/BF00289672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36(4):717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rusiak P, Lachmann T, Jaskowski P, van Leeuwen C (2007) Mental rotation of letters and shapes in developmental dyslexia. Perception 36:617–631. doi:10.1068/p5644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shea DL, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2001) Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: a 20 year longitudinal study. J Educ Psychol 93(3):604–614. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard RN, Hurwitz S (1984) Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. Cognition 18:196–1616. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(84)90024-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman JA (1967) Problem of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning. Psychol Rev 74(4):290–299. doi:10.1037/h0024723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman JA (1974) Field articulation, sex, spatial visualization, dependency, practice, laterality of the brain and birth order. Percept Mot Skills 38(3):1223–1235. doi:10.2466/pms.1974.38.3c.1223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman I, Kastuk D, Choi J, Phillips K (1999) Testosterone levels and spatial ability in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 24(8):813–822. doi:10.1016/S0306-4530(99)00031-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone LL (1950) Some primary abilities in visual thinking. Proc Am Philos Soc 94:517–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg SG, Kuse AR (1978) Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept Mot Skills 47(2):599–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voyer D, Voyer S, Bryden MP (1995) Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychol Bull 117:250–265. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wai J, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2009) Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. J Educ Psychol 101(4):817–835. doi:10.1037/a0016127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The writing of this paper was supported by a generous grant to Dr. Shannon Pruden and the Project on Language and Spatial Development (http://www.plsd.fiu.edu) from The Ware Foundation, Miami, FL (http://warefoundation.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alina Nazareth.

Additional information

This article is part of the special issue on “Spatial Learning and Reasoning Processes,” guest-edited by Thomas F. Shipley, Dedre Gentner, and Nora S. Newcombe. Handling editor of this manuscript: Thomas F. Shipley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nazareth, A., Herrera, A. & Pruden, S.M. Explaining sex differences in mental rotation: role of spatial activity experience. Cogn Process 14, 201–204 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0542-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0542-8

Keywords

Navigation