Skip to main content
Log in

Egocentric/allocentric and coordinate/categorical haptic encoding in blind people

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, the impact of visual experience on the capacity to use egocentric (body-centered) and allocentric (object-centered) representations in combination with categorical (invariant non-metric) and coordinate (variable metric) spatial relations was examined. Participants memorized through haptic (congenitally blind, adventitiously blind, and blindfolded) and haptic + visual (sighted) exploration triads of 3D objects and then they were asked to judge: “which object was closest/farthest to you?” (egocentric-coordinate); “which object was on your left/right?” (egocentric-categorical); “which object was closest/farthest to a target object (e.g., cone)?” (allocentric-coordinate); “which object was on the left/right of the target object (e.g., cone)?” (allocentric-categorical). The results showed a slowdown in processing time when congenitally blind people provided allocentric-coordinate judgments and adventitiously blind people egocentric-categorical judgments. Moreover, in egocentric judgments, adventitiously blind participants were less accurate than sighted participants. However, the overall performance was quite good and this supports the idea that the differences observed are more quantitative than qualitative. The theoretical implications of these results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carreiras M, Codina B (1992) Spatial cognition of the blind and sighted: visual and amodal hypotheses. Curr Psychol Cogn 12(1):51–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo Z, Vecchi T, Cornoldi C, Mammarella I, Bonino D, Ricciardi E, Pietrini P (2008) Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32(8):1346–1360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coluccia E, Mammarella I, Cornoldi C (2009) Centred egocentric, decentred egocentric, and allocentric spatial representations in the peripersonal space of congenital total blindness. Perception 38(5):679–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iachini T, Ruggiero G (2010) The role of visual experience in mental scanning of actual pathways: evidence from blind and sighted people. Perception 39:953–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iachini T, Ruggiero G, Conson M, Trojano L (2009) Lateralization of egocentric and allocentric spatial processing after parietal brain lesions. Brain Cogn 69(3):514–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn SM (1994) Image and brain: the resolution of the imagery debate. MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn SM, Thompson WL, Gitelman DR, Alpert NM (1998) Neural systems that encode categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: PET investigations. Psychobiology 26:333–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Postma A, Zuidhoek S, Noordzij ML, Kappers AML (2007) Differences between early-blind, late-blind, and blindfolded-sighted people in haptic spatial-configuration learning and resulting memory traces. Perception 36:1253–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieser JS, Hill EW, Talor CR, Bradfield A, Rosen S (1992) Visual experience, visual field size, and the development of nonvisual sensitivity to the spatial structure of outdoor neighbourhoods explored by walking. J Exp Psychol Gen 121(2):210–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero G, Ruotolo F, Iachini T (2009) The role of vision in egocentric and allocentric spatial frames of reference. Cogn Process 10(Suppl 2):S283–S285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruotolo F, Iachini T, Postma A, van der Ham IJM (2011a) Frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a hierarchical organization. Exp Brain Res 214(4):587–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruotolo F, van der Ham IJM, Iachini T, Postma A (2011b) The relationship between allocentric and egocentric frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial relations. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 64(6):1138–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruotolo F, Ruggiero G, Vinciguerra M, Iachini T (2012) Sequential vs simultaneous encoding of spatial information: a comparison between the blind and the sighted. Acta Psychol 139(2):382–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This supplement was not sponsored by outside commercial interests. It was funded entirely by ECONA, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Roma, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gennaro Ruggiero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruggiero, G., Ruotolo, F. & Iachini, T. Egocentric/allocentric and coordinate/categorical haptic encoding in blind people. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 1), 313–317 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0504-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0504-6

Keywords

Navigation