Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative assessment of the sealing ability of Nd:YAG laser versus a new desensitizing agent in human dentinal tubules: a pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dentinal hypersensitivity is a painful condition that occurs following periodontal treatment. Many treatment alternatives have been considered for this problem, including treatments with laser and dentinal adhesives. This study compared the sealing ability of Nd:YAG laser versus a new resin in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs. Ten human premolars were sectioned yielding 30 specimens of each premolar, which were randomly divided into three groups. The laser group was irradiated by Nd:YAG laser (1 W, 10 Hz, 60 s), the resin group was treated with the new Seal & Protect resin according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the third group served as the control group and did not receive any interventions. After preparation and gold coating of the samples, they were photographed by SEM at two magnifications (1500× and 4000×). The number and diameter (μm) of the dentinal tubules were recorded in selected fields, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey tests were used to determine significant differences between groups. The ANOVA results revealed significant differences in both the mean number (P < 0.001) and diameter (P < 0.05) among the three groups. Further statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the laser group and the resin group in both outcome measures (P < 0.05). Thus, both Nd:YAG laser and the new resin reduced the number and diameter of open dentinal tubules, a result that also explains the desensitization mechanism of these interventions. We further conclude that application of the new resin is more effective than Nd:YAG laser in minimizing the number and diameter of exposed dentinal tubules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rees I, Addy M. A cross-sectional study of dentin hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:997–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. von Troil B, Needleman I, Sanz M. A systematic review of the prevalence of root sensitivity following periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29Suppl 3:173–177; discussion 95–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perry R, Klokkevold P, Carranza F. General principles of periodontal surgery. In: Newman M, Takei H, PR. K, Carranza F, editors. Carranza’s clinical periodontology. 10th ed. London: WB Sanders; 2006. 895–897.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergenholtz G, Hasselgren G. Root dentin hypersensitivity. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang N, editors. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry: endodontics and periodontics. 5th ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2008. p. 518–522.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobsen P, Bruce G. Clinical dentin hypersensitivity: understanding the causes and prescribing a treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract 2001;2:1–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:808–813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rösing CK, Fiorini T, Liberman DN, Cavagni J. Dentine hypersensitivity: analysis of self-care products. Braz Oral Res 2009;23:56–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Birang R, Poursamimi J, Gutknecht N, Lampert F, Mir M. Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment. Lasers Med Sci 2007;22:21–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brännström M. The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. J Endod 1986;12:453–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG, Bulman JS, Newman HN. Prevalence of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist periodontology department. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:989–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rees JS, Jin LJ, Lam S, Kudanowska I, Vowles R. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in a hospital clinic population in Hong Kong. J Dent 2003;31:453–461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:990–998; Quiz 1028-9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pereira R, Chava VK. Efficacy of a 3% potassium nitrate desensitizing mouthwash in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Periodontol 2001;72:1720–1725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yates R, Ferro R, Newcombe RG, Addy M. A comparison of a reformulated potassium citrate desensitizing toothpaste with the original proprietary product. J Dent 2005;33:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baysan A, Lynch E. Treatment of cervical sensitivity with a root sealant. Am J Dent 2003;16:135–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Duran I, Sengun A. The long-term effectiveness of five current desensitizing products on cervical dentine sensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:351–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Yonaga K, Matsumoto K. Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by lasers: a review. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:715–721.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Prati C, Cervellati F, Sanasi V, Montebugnoli L. Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity with resin adhesives: 4-week evaluation. Am J Dent 2001;14:378–382.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishikawa I, Aoki A, Takasaki AA. Potential applications of erbium:YAG laser in periodontics. J Periodontal Res 2004;39:275–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Matsumoto K. Lasers in endodontics: a review. Int Endod J 2000;33:173–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lier BB, Rosing CK, Aass AM, Gjermo P. Treatment of dentin hypersensitivity by Nd:YAG laser. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:501–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kara C, Orbak R. Comparative evaluation of Nd:YAG laser and fluoride varnish for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Endod 2009;37:971–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zapletalova Z, Perina J, Novotny R, Chmelickova H. Suitable conditions for sealing of open dentinal tubules using a pulsed Nd:YAG laser. Photomed Laser Surg 2007;25:495–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ciaramicoli MT, Carvalho RCR, Eduardo CP. Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity using neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Clinical evaluation. Lasers Surg Med 2003;33:358–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gernhardt CR, Aschenbach K, Bekes K, Schaller HG. The effect of different desensitizing agents on initial demineralization of human root dentin. Quintessence Int 2005;39:679–685.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vaitkeviciene I, Paipaliene P, Zekonis G. Clinical effectiveness of dentin sealer in treating dental root sensitivity following periodontal surgery. Medicina (Kaunas) 2006;42:195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Birang R KN, Mohammadpour M, Abed AM, Gutknecht N, Mir M. Evaluation of Nd:YAG laser on partial oxygen saturation of pulpal blood in anterior hypersensitive teeth. Lasers Med Sci 2008;23:291–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De Magalhães MF, Matson E, De Rossi W, Bento Alves J. A morphological in vitro study of the effects of Nd:YAG laser on irradiated cervical dentin. Photomed Laser Surg 2004;22:527–532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lan WH, Liu HC, Lin CP. The combined occluding effect of sodium fluoride varnish and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on human dentinal tubules. J Endod 1999;25:424–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lan W-H, Lee B-S, Liu H-C, Lin C-P. Morphologic study of Nd:YAG laser usage in treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Endod 2004;30:131–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Birang R, Kaviani N, Mohammadpour M, Abed AM, Gutknecht N, Mir M. Evaluation of Nd:YAG laser on partial oxygen saturation of pulpal blood in anterior hypersensitive teeth. Lasers Med Sci 2008;23:291–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Arrais CAG, Chan DCN, Giannini M. Effects of desensitizing agents on dental tubule occlusion. J Appl Oral Sci 2004;12:144–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Camps J, About I, Van Meerbeek B, Franquin JC. Efficiency and cytotoxicity of resin-based desensitizing agents. Am J Dent 2002;15:300–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kolker JL, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Dawson DV. Effect of desensitizing agents on dentin permeability and dentin tubule occlusion. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:211–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yu M. Comparative research on seal & protect for treatment of hypersensitivity of the dentine [in Chinese]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2001;10:8–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mina Mahdian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abed, A.M., Mahdian, M., Seifi, M. et al. Comparative assessment of the sealing ability of Nd:YAG laser versus a new desensitizing agent in human dentinal tubules: a pilot study. Odontology 99, 45–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-010-0136-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-010-0136-1

Key words

Navigation