Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Dental occlusion: modern concepts and their application in implant prosthodontics

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this article was to review the literature on various aspects of occlusion related to implant prosthodontics, using PubMed and the Cochrane library. Even if the number of studies on implants and prosthodontics is very large, no randomized controlled trials or Cochrane reviews were found on the possible influence of occlusal design or characteristics of occlusion on treatment outcome. Therefore, studies and articles of a lower evidence level were accepted as the main part of the review. The widely spread opinion that implants are superior to natural teeth was refuted by two recent consensus conferences, which concluded that the long-term outcome of implant restorations is not better than that of natural teeth. No controlled studies on the optimal features of a harmonious natural and/or restored occlusion, including implant prostheses, were found. Nor was there any evidence that more sophisticated methods in jaw registration, e.g., using face-bows and adjustable articulators, compared with simpler methods, will yield better clinical prosthodontic results. This article discusses, among other things, concepts of occlusion of implant-supported restorations, occlusal material, cantilevers, and occlusal risk factors. Within the limitations of the review, it was concluded that many factors can influence implant failure and peri-implant bone loss but that little is known of the relative importance of such factors. Most probably, however, occlusal factors and details of occlusion are in general of minor importance for the outcome of implant restorations. Occlusion can be managed successfully by using simple methods for jaw registration and different occlusal concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mohl ND, Davidson RM. Concepts of occlusion. In: Mohl ND, Zarb GA, Carlsson GE, Rugh JD, editors. A textbook of occlusion. Chicago: Quintessence; 1988. p. 161–75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Türp JC, Greene CS, Strub JR. Dental occlusion: a critical reflection on past, present and future concepts. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35:446–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlsson GE, Haraldson T, Mohl ND. The dentition. In: Mohl ND, Zarb GA, Carlsson GE, Rugh JD, editors. A textbook of occlusion. Chicago: Quintessence; 1988. p. 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mohl ND. Diagnostic rationale: an overview. In: Mohl ND, Zarb GA, Carlsson GE, Rugh JD, editors. A textbook of occlusion. Chicago: Quintessence; 1988. p. 179–84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Evolution of occlusion and occlusal instruments. J Prosthodont 1993;2:33–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harwood CL. The evidence base for current practices in prosthodontics. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2008;16:24–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(suppl 3):97–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gotfredsen K, Carlsson GE, Jokstad A, Arvidson Fyrberg K, Berge M, Bergendal B, Bergendal T, Ellingsen JE, Gunne J, Hofgren M, Holm B, Isidor F, Karlsson S, Klemetti E, Lang NP, Lindh T, Midtbø M, Molin M, Närhi T, Nilner K, Owall B, Pjetursson B, Saxegaard E, Schou S, Stokholm R, Thilander B, Tomasi C, Wennerberg A. Implants and/or teeth: consensus statements and recommendations. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35(suppl 1):2–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlsson GE. Changes in the prosthodontic literature 1966 to 2042. J Can Dent Assoc 2005;71:328–328e.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohlsson A. Systematic reviews: theory and practice. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 1994;219:25–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glenny AM, Esposito M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The assessment of systematic reviews in dentistry. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:85–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brägger U (Guest editor). First European workshop on evidence-based reconstructive dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(suppl 3):1–261.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iacono VJ, Cochran DL. State of the science on implant dentistry: a workshop developed using an evidence-based approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(suppl):7–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Owen P. Appropriatech: prosthodontics for the many, not just for the few. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:261–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carlsson GE, Omar R. Trends in prosthodontics. Med Princ Pract 2006;15:167–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Choosing or refusing oral implants: a prospective study of edentulous volunteers for a clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:483–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:31–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pjetursson BE, Lang NP. Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35(suppl 1):72–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lang NP, Müller F; Working Group I. Epidemiology and oral function associated with tooth loss and prosthetic dental restorations. Consensus report of Working Group I. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(suppl 3):46–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klineberg I. Interarch relationships of teeth. In: Klineberg I, Jagger R, editors. Occlusion and clinical practice. An evidence-based approach. Edinburgh: Wright/Elsevier; 2004. p. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tangerud T, Carlsson GE. Jaw registration and occlusal morphology. In: Karlsson S, Nilner K, Dahl BL, editors. A textbook of fixed prosthodontics. The Scandinavian approach. Stockholm: Gothia;2000. p. 209–30.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carlsson GE. Facts and fallacies: an evidence base for complete dentures. Dent Update 2006;33:134–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carlsson GE. Critical review of some dogmas in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res 2009;53:3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Käyser AF. Shortened dental arches and oral function. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8:457–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kanno T, Carlsson GE. A review of the Shortened Dental Arch Concept focusing on the work by the Käyser/Nijmegen group. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:850–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, et al. Osteointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977(suppl);16:1–132.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective fifteen-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:329–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ekelund J-A, Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: a prospective study on Brånemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16;602–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sarita PT, Witter DJ, Kreulen CM, Van’t Hof MA, Creugers NH. Chewing ability of subjects with shortened dental arches. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003;31:328–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Baba K, Igarashi Y, Nishiyama A, John MT, Akagawa Y, Ikebe K, Ishigami T, Kobayashi H, Yamashita S. Patterns of missing occlusal units and oral health-related quality of life in SDA patients. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:621–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Walther W. Determinations of a healthy aging dentition: maximum number of bilateral centric stops and optimum vertical dimension of occlusion. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(suppl):77–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Budtz-Jorgensen E, Isidor F. A 5-year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed partial dentures compared with removable partial dentures in a geriatric population. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:42–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Thomason JM, Moynihan PJ, Steen N, Jepson NJ. Time to survival for the restoration of the shortened lower dental arch. J Dent Res 2007;86:646–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Witter DJ, Van Elteren P, Käyser AF, Van Rossum MJ. The effect of removable partial dentures on the oral function in shortened dental arches. J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Witter DJ, Creugers NHJ, Kreulen CM, de Haan AF. Occlusal stability in shortened dental arches. J Dent Res 2001;80:432–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wöstmann B, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Jepson N, Mushimoto E, Palmqvist S, Sofou A, Owall B. Indications for removable partial dentures: a literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:139–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Beyron H. Characteristics of functionally optimal occlusion and principles of occlusal rehabilitation. J Am Dent Assoc 1954;48:648–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Beyron H. Occlusion: point of significance in planning restorative procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:641–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zarb GA, Fenton AH. Prosthodontic, operative, and orthodontic therapy. In: Mohl ND, Zarb GA, Carlsson GE, Rugh JD, editors. A textbook of occlusion. Chicago: Quintessence; 1988. p. 305–28.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Carlsson GE, Tangerud T. Functional aspects. In: Karlsson S, Nilner K, Dahl BL, editors. A textbook of fixed prosthodontics. The Scandinavian approach. Stockholm: Gothia; 2000. p. 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Walton T. Occlusion and fixed prosthodontics. In: Klineberg I, Jagger R, editors. Occlusion and clinical practice. An evidence-based approach. Edinburgh: Wright/Elsevier; 2004. p. 103–17.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Klineberg I, Kingston D, Murray G. The bases for using a particular occlusal design in tooth and implant-borne reconstructions and complete dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(suppl 3):151–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Haraldson T, Carlsson GE, Ingervall B. Functional state, bite force and postural muscle activity in patients with osseointegrated oral implant bridges. Acta Odontol Scand 1979;37:195–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lundgren D, Laurell L, Falk H, Bergendal T. Occlusal force pattern during mastication in dentitions with mandibular fixed partial dentures supported on osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Falk H. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses. Swed Dent J Suppl 1990;69:1–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Abarca M, Van Steenberghe D, Malevez C, Jacobs R. The neurophysiology of osseointegrated oral implants. A clinically under-estimated aspect. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:161–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wood MR, Vermilyea SG. A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:447–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wennerberg A, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Influence of occlusal factors on treatment outcome: a study of 109 consecutive patients with implant-supported fixed prostheses opposing maxillary complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:550–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lulic M, Brägger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Salvi GE. Ante’s (1926) law revisited: a systematic review on survival rates and complications of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) on severely reduced periodontal tissue support. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(suppl 3):63–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Romeo E, Lops D, Margutti E, Ghisolfi M, Chiapasco M, Vogel G. Implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses in partially edentulous arches. A seven-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:303–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Becker CM. Cantilever fixed prostheses utilizing dental implants: a 10-year retrospective analysis. Quintessence Int 2004;35:437–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wennström J, Zurdo J, Karlsson S, Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl K, Lindhe J. Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:1077–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kreissl ME, Gerds T, Muche R, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:720–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Örtorp A, Jemt T. Laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the partially edentulous mandible: a 10-year comparative follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;10:128–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ortorp A, Jemt T. Early laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 15-year comparative follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008 Sep 9. (Epub ahead of print).

  57. Falk H, Laurell L, Lundgren D. Occlusal force pattern in dentitions with mandibular implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses occluded with complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:55–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Falk H, Laurell L, Lundgren D. Occlusal interferences and cantilever joint stress in implant-supported prostheses occluding with complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:70–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Hobkirk JA, Psarros KJ. The influence of occlusal surface material on peak masticatory forces using osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:345–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A six-year prosthodontic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:236–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Carlson B, Carlsson GE. Prosthodontic complications in osseointegrated dental implant treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:90–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Jemt T, Johansson J. Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:61–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, editors. Implant over dentures. The standard of care for edentulous patients. Chicago: Quintessence; 2003.

  65. Renouard F, Rangert B. Risk factors in implant dentistry. Simplified clinical analysis for predictable treatment. Chicago: Quintessence Books; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Engel E, Gomez-Roman G, Axmann-Krcmar D. Effect of occlusal wear on bone loss and Periotest value of dental implants. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:444–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Johansson A, Johansson A-K, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Rehabilitation of the worn dentition. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:548–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Brägger U, Aeschlimann S, Bürgin W, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:26–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Association between marginal bone loss around osseointegrated mandibular implants and smoking habits: a 10-year follow-up study. J Dent Res 1997;76:1667–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Lobbezoo F, Van Der Zaag J, Naeije M. Bruxism: its multiple causes and its effects on dental implants: an updated review. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:293–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Taylor TD, Wiens J, Carr A. Evidence-based considerations for removable prosthodontic and dental implant occlusion: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:555–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Tawil G, Aboujaoude N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:275–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Hobkirk JA, Wiskott HW; Working Group 1. Biomechanical aspects of oral implants. Consensus report of Working Group 1. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(suppl 2):52–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Willings M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;18:CD003878.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Willings M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The effectiveness of immediate, early, and conventional loading of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:893–904.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Galli F, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Testori T, Esposito M. Immediate non-occlusal vs. early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients: a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Peri-implant bone and soft-tissue levels. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:546–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Schincaglia GP, Marzola R, Giovanni GF, Chiara CS, Scotti R. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:474–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Lundqvist S, Haraldson T. Occlusal perception of thickness in patients with bridges on osseointegrated oral implants. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92:88–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Trulsson M. Sensory and motor function of teeth and dental implants: a basis for osseoperception. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2005;32:119–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Enkling N, Nicolay C, Utz KH, Jöhren P, Wahl G, Mericske-Stern R. Tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants and natural teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:231–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 450, SE 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden

    Gunnar E. Carlsson

Authors
  1. Gunnar E. Carlsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunnar E. Carlsson.

Additional information

This article is based on a lecture presented at the Asian Academy of Osseointegration, Hiroshima, Japan, July 18, 2008

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlsson, G.E. Dental occlusion: modern concepts and their application in implant prosthodontics. Odontology 97, 8–17 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-008-0096-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-008-0096-x

Key words

Search

Navigation