Abstract
Bullying between students in the school setting is an increasing problem. Bullying can be defined as any form of repeated mental or physical violence carried out by one or several individuals on a person who is not capable of defending himself (Roland and Idsoe, Aggress Behav 27:446–462, 2001). The aim of this paper is to observe the expression of self-concept and adjustment strategies developed by children subject to this kind of violence. Five hundred twenty-four students between the ages of 8 and 12 (m = 9.44) participated in the longitudinal study. Two measurements were made during the same school year at an interval of 6 months. The results show that the student victims of bullying present weaker self-conceptions than the control group. Recourse to avoidance strategies would be dominant among student victims of bullying. Moreover, recourse to “avoidance” type strategies would lead to an increase in the frequency of bullying while recourse to “approach”-type strategies would lead to a reduction in it. Furthermore, it would seem that recourse to avoidance strategies at T1 lowers the student’s self-concepts at T2. The opposite effect is observed with the approach strategies. These different results emphasize the necessity to establish prevention programs which allow an intervention simultaneously on the level of the school, the family, and the student.
Résumé
Les agressions entre élèves en milieu scolaire constituent un problème grandissant. Le bullying peut être défini comme toutes formes de violences physiques ou mentales répétées, effectuées par un ou plusieurs individus sur une personne qui n’est pas capable de se défendre elle-même (Roland and Idsoe 2001). Cette étude a pour objectif d’observer l’expression des concepts de soi et les stratégies d’ajustement mises en place auprès des enfants impliqués dans ce type de violence. 524 élèves âgés de 8 à 12 ans (m = 9.44) ont participé à l’étude longitudinale. Deux mesures ont été réalisées au cours de la même année scolaire à 6 mois d’intervalle. Les résultats montrent que les élèves victimes d’agressions répétées présentent des conceptions de soi plus faibles que le groupe contrôle. Le recours aux stratégies d’évitement serait dominant auprès des élèves victimes de bullying. En outre, le recours aux stratégies de type «évitement» conduirait à une augmentation de la fréquence des agressions alors que le recours aux stratégies de type «approche» conduirait à une diminution de celle-ci. Par ailleurs, il semblerait que le recours aux stratégies d’évitement à T1 vienne dégrader les concepts de soi de l’élève à T2. Nous observons l’effet inverse avec les stratégies d’approche. Ces différents résultats soulignent la nécessité qu’il y a à instaurer des programmes de prévention permettant une intervention simultanée au niveau de l’institution, de la famille et de l’élève.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreou, E. (2000). Bully/victim problem and their associations with psychological constructs in 8 to 12 old Greek schoolchildren. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 49–56.
Andreou, J. A. (2001). Bully/victim problems and their association with coping behaviour in conflictual peer interactions among school-age children. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 59–66.
Atschuler, J., & Ruble, D. (1989). Developmental changes in children’s awareness of strategies for coping with uncontrollable stress. Child Development, 60, 1337–1349.
Austin, S., & Joseph, S. (1996). Assessment of bully/victim problems in 8 to 11 year-olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 447–456.
Baldry, A. C. (1998). Bullying among Italian middle school students. School and Psychology Intervention, 19, 361–374.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequence and control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bijttebier, P., & Vertommen, H. (1998). Coping with peer arguments in school-aged children with bully/victim problems. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 387–394.
Boulton, M. J., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Bully/victim problems in middle school children: Stability self-perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 315–329.
Boulton, M. J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Education and Psychology, 62, 73–87.
Brandibas, G., Jeunier, B., & Favard, A. M. (2002). Conduites de harcèlement à l’école: Premier éléments descriptifs d’une étude menée auprès des collégiens en classe de sixième et cinquième. Journal de thérapie comportementale et cognitive, 12(3), 103–108.
Causey, D. L., & Dubow, E. F. (1992). Development of a self-report coping measure for elementary school children. Journal of Clinical and Child Psychology, 21, 47–59.
Comeda, M., & Gossens, F. A. (2005). Children’s opinion on effective strategies to cope with bullying: The importance of bullying role and perspective. Educational Research, 47(1), 93–105.
Craig, W. M. (1997). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personal and Individual Differences, 24(1), 123–130.
Craig, W., Pepler, D., & Blais, J. (2007). Responding to bullying: What works? School Psychology International, 28(4), 465–477.
Dodge, K., & Coie, J. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158.
Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Does low self-regard invite victimization? Developmental Psychology, 34(2), 299–309.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 229–244.
Fontaine, R., & Réveillère, C. (2004). Le bullying (ou victimisation) en milieu scolaire†: Description, retentissements vulnÉrabilisants et psychopathologiques. Annales médico-psychologiques, 162, 588–594.
Frisen, A., Jonsson, A. K., & Persson, C. (2007). Adolescent’s perception of bullying: Who is the victim? Who is the bully? What can be done to stop bullying? Adolescence, 42(168), 749–761.
Graham, S., Bellmore, A. D., & Mize, J. (2007). Peer victimization, aggression, and their co-occurrence in middle school: Pathways to adjustment problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(3), 363–378.
Haan, N. (1977). Coping and defending. New York: Academic.
Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.
Houbre, B., Tarquinio, C., Thuillier, I., & Hergott, E. (2006). Bullying among students and its consequences on health. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(2), 183–208.
Hunter, S. C., Boyle, J., & Warden, J. (2004). Appraisal and coping strategy use in victims of school bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 83–107.
Hunter, S., Boyle, J. M., & Warden, D. (2007). Perceptions and correlates of peer-victimization and bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 797–810.
Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpelä, M., Marttunen, M., Rimpelä, A., & Rantenan, P. (1999). Bullying, depression and suicidal ideation in Finnish adolescents: School survey. British Medical Journal, 319, 348–351.
Kepenekci, Y. K., & Cinkir, S. (2006). Bullying among Turkish high school students. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30, 193–204.
Khatri, P., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Patterson, C. (2000). Aggression and peer victimization as predictors of self-reported behavioral and emotional adjustment. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 345–358.
Kochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). Victimized children’s responses to peer’s aggression: Behavior associated with reduced versus continued victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 59–73.
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Skinner, K. (2002). Children’s coping strategies: Moderators of the effect of peer-victimisation? Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 267–278.
Kristensen, S. M., & Smith, P. K. (2003). The use of coping strategies by Danish children classed as bullies, victims, bully/victims and not involved, in response to different (hypothetical) types of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 479–488.
Lagerspetz, K. M., Bjorkqvist, K., Berts, M., & King, E. (1982). Group aggression among schoolchildren in three schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 45–52.
Lazarus, S. R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
Leiderman, P. H. (1983). Social ecology and childbirth: The newborn nursery as environmental stressor. In N. Garmezy & M. Rutter (Eds.), Stress, coping and development in children (pp. 133–136). New York: Academic.
Lodge, J., & Feldman, S. S. (2007). Avoidant coping between appearance-related victimization and self-esteem in young Australian adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(4), 633–642.
Lunde, C., Frisen, A., & Hwang, C. P. (2006). Is peer victimization related to body esteem in 10-year-old girls and boys? Body Image, 3(1), 25–33.
Marsh, H. W., Parada, R. H., Yeung, A. S., & Healey, J. (2001). Aggressive school trouble makers and victims: A longitudinal model examining the pivotal role of self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 411–419.
NayLor, P., Cowie, H., & del Rey, R. (2001). Coping strategies of secondary school children in response to being bullied. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 6(3), 2001.
O’Moore, A. M. (1989). Bullying in Britain and Ireland: An overview. In E. Roland & E. Munthe (Eds.), Bullying: An international perspective. London: Fulton.
O’Moore, A. M., & Kirkham, C. (2001). Self-esteem and its relationship to bullying behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 269–283.
Olweus, D. (1973). Personality and aggression. In J. K. Cole & D. D. Jensen (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1972. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the school: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington: Wiley.
Olweus, D. (1984). Aggressors and their victims: Bullying at school. In N. Frude & H. Gault (Eds.), Disruptive behavior in schools. New York: Wiley.
Olweus, D. (1989). Bully/victim problems among school children: Basics facts and effects of school based intervention program. In K. Rubin & D. Pepler (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Pepler, D. S., Craig, W. M., Ziegler, S., & Charach, A. (1993). A school based anti-bullying intervention: Preliminary evaluation. In D. Tattun (Ed.), Understanding and managing bullying (pp. 76–91). Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
Perrenoud, Ph. (1989). Parle comme il faut ! Réflexions sociologique sur l’ordre linguistique. In G. Schoni, J. P. Bronckart, & Ph Perrenoud (Eds.), La langue française est-elle gouvernable? Normes et activité langagière (pp. 79–108). Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807–814.
Perry, D. G., Hodges, E. V. E., & Egan, S. K. (2001). Determinants of chronic victimization by peers: A review and new model of family influence. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 73–104). New York: Guilford.
Pierrehumbert, B., Plancherel, B., & Jankech-Caretta, C. (1987). Image de soi et perception des compétences propres chez l'enfant: Présentation d'un questionnaire récent d'estime de soi pour enfants. Revue de psychologie appliquée, 37(4), 359–377.
Piers, E. V. (1984). Piers–Harris children’s self-concept scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Roland, E., & Idsoe, T. (2001). Aggression and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 446–462.
Rosen, P. J., Milich, R., & Harris, M. J. (2007). Victims of their own cognitions: Implicit social cognitions, emotional distress, and peer victimization. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 221–226.
Roth, S., & Cohen, L. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41(7), 813–819.
Salmivalli, C., Karhunen, J., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1996). How do the victims respond to bullying? Aggressive Behavior, 22, 99–109.
Seiffe-Krenke, I. (1995). Stress, coping and relationships in adolescence. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Slee, P. T. (1995). Peer victimization and its relationship to depression among Australian primary school students. Personal and Individual Differences, 18(1), 57–62.
Slee, P. T., & Rigby, K. (1993). The relationship of Eysenk’s personality factors and self-esteem to bully/victim behavior in Australian school boys. Personal and Individual Differences, 14, 371–373.
Smith, P. K., & Sharp, S. (1994). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge.
Smith, P. K., & Thompson, D. A. (1991). Practical approaches to bullying. London: Fulton.
Smith, P. K., Shu, S., & Madsen, K. (2001). Characteristics of victims of school bullying: Developmental changes in coping strategies and skills. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school (pp. 332–352). New York: Guilford.
Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R. F., & Liefooghe, P. D. (2002). Definitions of bullying: A comparison of terms used, and the age and gender differences, in a fourteen-country international comparison. Child Development, 73(11), 19–33.
Smith, P. K., Talamelli, L., Cowie, H., Naylor, P., & Chanhan, P. (2004). Profiles of non-victims, escaped victims, continuing victims and new victims of school bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 565–581.
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russel, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385.
Smorti, A., & Ciucci, E. (2000). Narrative strategies in bullies and victims Italian school. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 33–48.
Tanaka, T. (2001). The identity formation of the victim of “shunning”. School Psychology International, 22(4), 463–476.
Wild, L. G., Flisher, A. J., Bhana, A., & Lombard, C. (2004). Associations among adolescent risk behaviours and self-esteem in six domains. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(8), 1454–1467.
Wilton, M., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2000). Emotional regulation and display in classroom victims of bullying: Characteristic expression of affect, coping styles and relevant contextual factors. Social Development, 9(2), 226–245.
Withney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3–25.
Yang, S. J., Kim, J. M., Kim, S. W., Shin, I. S., & Yoon, J. S. (2006). Bullying and victimization behaviors in boys and girls at South Korean primary schools. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent psychiatry, 45(1), 69–77.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the Board of Education of the Moselle, the various school principals, teachers, and students as well as all of the individuals who, each in their own way, contributed to making this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Barbara Houbre. Paul Verlaine University of Metz, Unité “Maladies chroniques, Santé perçue, Processus adaptatifs” EA, Equipe de psychologie de la santé—Metz, EPSaM, Ile du Saulcy, 57000, Metz, France. E-mail: houbre@univ-metz.fr
Current themes of research:
Health psychology. bullying at school. and trauma.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Houbre, B., Tarquinio, C., Thuillier, I., & Hergott, E. (2006). Bullying and health consequences. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(2), 183–209.
Cyril Tarquinio. Paul Verlaine University of Metz, Unité “Maladies chroniques, Santé perçue, Processus adaptatifs” EA, Equipe de psychologie de la santé—Metz, EPSaM, Ile du Saulcy, 57000, Metz, France. E-mail: tarquinio@univ-metz.fr; Web site: www.cyriltarquinio.com
Current themes of research:
Health psychology. psychotherapy and disease. PTSD.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Tarquinio, C., & Somat, A. (2001). Scholastic achievement, academic self-schemata and normative clearsightedness. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XVI(1), 117–129.
Houbre, B., Tarquinio, C., Lhuillier, I., & Hergott, E. (2006). Bullying among students and its consequences on health. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(2), 183–209.
Tarquinio, C., & Tarquinio, P. (2001). Norme d’internalité, attraction physique et évaluation scolaire. Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 3, 373–390.
Jean-Baptiste Lanfranchi. Paul-Verlaine University of Metz, Unité “Maladies chroniques, Santé perçue, Processus adaptatifs” EA, Equipe de psychologie de la santé—Metz, EPSaM, Ile du Saulcy, 57000, Metz, France. E-mail: Lanfranchi@univ-metz.fr; Web site: http://www.univ-metz.fr/ufr/sha/2lp-sante/
Current themes of research:
Work, stress and Musculoskeletal disorders. Child development and quality of life. Data analysis.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Lemétayer, F., & Lanfranchi, J.-B. (2006). Parental educative practices with an unimpaired or Down's syndrome toddler: comparative study of a joint activity in early period. Psychologie Française, 51(4), 461–474.
Lemétayer, F., & Lanfranchi, J.-B. (2006). Mental deficiency, behavioral autonomy and solving-problem in early period: factorial analysis of parent–child behaviors with non-defective and Down's syndrome toddler. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56(3), 179–189.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Houbre, B., Tarquinio, C. & Lanfranchi, JB. Expression of self-concept and adjustment against repeated aggressions: the case of a longitudinal study on school bullying. Eur J Psychol Educ 25, 105–123 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-009-0005-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-009-0005-x