Skip to main content
Log in

Аlways with them: smartphone use by children, adolescents, and young adults—characteristics, habits of use, sharing, and satisfaction of needs

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of the extensive use of smartphones by children, adolescents, and young adults, we set out to explore the characteristics and habits of usage of smartphones from their perspective, and to examine the relationship between usage habits and the satisfaction of needs. As part of a mixed-method study, 551 respondents from Israel completed the questionnaires, and 110 of the respondents were also interviewed. The study provides an explanation for the dramatic rise and the massive use of smartphones by children, adolescents, and young adults. The findings show that respondents feel that with the help of their smartphones they can maintain extensive communication with those around them, satisfying their important needs, and more. Respondents have become highly dependent on the use of various applications, which leads to an even more extensive use. As the use of smartphones increases, respondents feel that they are maximizing the potential offered by these applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexa Internet Inc.: Alexa top 500 global sites. http://www.alexa.com/topsites (2011). Accessed 26 Sep 11.

  2. Atwal, K., Millwood Hargrave, A., Sancho, J., Agyeman, L., Karet, N.: What Children Watch: Analysis of Children’s Programming Provisions Between 1997–2001. BSC/ITC, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117, 497–529 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baumgartner, S.E., Sumter, S.R., Peter, J., Valkenburg, P.M., Livingstone, S.: Does country context matter? Investigating the predictors of teen sexting across Europe. Comput. Hum. Behav. 34, 157–164 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baym, N.: Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Polity, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berndt, T.J.: Exploring the effects of friendship quality on social development. In: Bukowiski, W.M., Newcomb, A.F., Hartup, W.W. (eds.) The Company They Keep: Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence, pp. 346–365. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd, D.M.: It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press, New Haven (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brettel, M., Reich, J.-C., Gavilanes, J.M., Flatten, T.C.: What drives advertising success on Facebook? An advertising-effectiveness model measuring the effects on sales of “likes” and other social-network stimuli. J. Advert. Res. 55(2), 162–175 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buckingham, D.: Introducing identity. In: Buckingham, D. (ed.) Youth, Identity and Digital Media, pp. 1–24. MIT, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buhrmester, D.: Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Dev. 61, 1101–1111 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, L.: The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford University Press, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coleman, A.M.: Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford Reference Online (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Comstock, G.A., Scharrer, E.: Media and the American Child. Academic, Amsterdam; Boston (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Desjarlais, M., Willoughby, T.: A longitudinal study of the relation between adolescent boys and girls’ computer use with friends and friendship quality: Support for the social compensation or the rich-get-richer hypothesis? Comput. Hum. Behav., 26, 896–905 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Donath, J., Boyd, D.: Public displays of connection. BT Technol. J. 22(4), 71–82 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duerager, A., Livingstone, S.: How Can Parents Support Children’s Internet Safety? London School of Economics, EU Children Online, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eisen, S., Lillard, A.S.: Young children’s thinking about touchscreens versus other media in the US. J. Child. Media 11, 167–179 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The benefits of Facebook ‘‘friends:’’ social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 12,1143–1168 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gatfield, L., Millwood-Hargrave, A.: Dramatic Licence—Fact or Fiction? Broadcasting Standards Commission, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goggin, G., Hjorth, L.: Routledge Companion to Mobile Media. Routledge, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hartup, W.W.: Friendships and their developmental significance. In: McGurk, H. (ed.) Childhood Social Development: Contemporary Perspectives, pp. 175–205. Routledge, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ho, H., Shin, W., Lwin, M.O.: Social networking site use and materialistic values among youth the safeguarding role of the parent–child relationship and self-regulation. Commun. Res. Ref. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216683775 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Holbert, R.L., Stephenson, M.T.: The importance of indirect effects in media effects research: testing for mediation in structural equation modeling. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 47, 556–572 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., HerrStephenson, B., Tripp, L., et al.: Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: kids living and learning with new media. The MIT, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Knight, J., Weedon, A.: Identity and social media. Convergence (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514536365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., Crawford, A.: Internet paradox revisited. J. Soc. Issues 58, 49–74 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lansdown, G., Akullo, M., Carr, J., Hecht, M., Palmer, T.: Child safety online: global challenges and strategies. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) December. (2011). https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/ict_eng.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2018

  28. Lim, S.S.: Through the tablet glass: transcendent parenting in an era of mobile media and cloud computing. J. Child. Media 10(1), 21–29 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Livingstone, S.: Evaluating the online risks for children in Europe. Telos 73, 52–69 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Livingstone, S.: Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media Soc. 10, 393–411 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Livingstone, S.: Children and the Internet: Great Expectations, Challenging Realities. Polity, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Livingstone, S.: Online risk, harm and vulnerability: reflections on the evidence base for child internet safety policy. ZER J. Commun. Stud. 18, 13–28 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Livingstone, S.: From mass to social media? Advancing accounts of social change. Soc. Media Soc. 29:2056305 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Livingstone, S., Bober, M.: UK Children Go Online: Final report of key project findings. London School of Economics and Political Science, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A. (eds) Children, Risk and Safety on the Internet: Research and Policy Challenges in Comparative Perspective. Marston Books, Bristol (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Vincent, J., Mascheroni, G., Ólafsson, K.: Net Children Go Mobile: The UK Report. London School of Economics and Political Science, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Murru, M.F.: Social networking among European children: new findings on privacy, identity and connection. In: Wolton, Dominique (eds.) Identité(s) Numérique(s). Les Essentials d’Hermès. CNRS Editions, Paris (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Staksrud, E.: Risky social networking practices among ‘under-age’ users: lessons for evidence-based policy. J. Comput. Med. Commun. 18(3), 303–320 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Duggan, M., Smith, A., Beaton, M.: Teens, Social Media, and Privacy. Internet & Technology (2014). http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/05/21/teens-social-media-and-privacy/. Accessed 17 Oct 2014

  40. Mascheroni, G., Olafsson, K.: Net Children go Mobile: Risks and Opportunities, 2nd edn. Educatt, Milano (2014). http://www.netchildrengomobile.eu/reports/. Accessed 16 Oct 2018

  41. Maslow, A.: A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. SO, 370–396 (1943)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Miller, V.: New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence 14, 387 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Millwood-Hargrave, A.: Issues facing broadcast regulation. Broadcasting Standards Authority, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Millwood-Hargrave, A., Livingstone, S.: Harm and Offence in Media Content: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Intellect, Bristol (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Millwood-Hargrave, A., Livingstone, S.:. Harm and Offence in Media Content: A Review of the Evidence, 2nd edn. Intellect, Bristol (2009). ISBN:9781841502380

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ofcom—Office of Communications: UK adults’ media literacy report. (2010). http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/adults-media-literacy.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2018

  47. Ofcom—Office of Communications: Children and parents: media use and attitudes report. (2016). https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/children/children-parents-nov16. Accessed 16 Oct 2018

  48. Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Ross, C., Simmering, M.G., Arseneault, J.M., Orr, R.R.: The influence of shyness on the use of Facebook in an undergraduate sample. CyberPsychol. Behav. 12, 337–340 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sheldon, P.: The relationship between unwillingness to communicate and students’ Facebook use. J. Media Psychol. 20, 67–75 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stevens, R., Gilliard-Matthews, S., Dunaev, J., Woods, M.K., Brawner, B.: The digital hood: social media use among youth in disadvantaged neighborhoods. New Media Soc. 19, 950–967 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Valkenburg, P.M., Peter J.: Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: a decade of research. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 18, 1–5 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Walther, J.B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., Tong, S.T.: The role of friends’ behavior on evaluations of individuals’ Facebook profiles: are we known by the company we keep? Hum. Commun. Res. 34, 28–49 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zilka, C.G.: Empowering Parents in the Social Media Age—The Three Element Way. Butan-Galim, Hebrew (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zilka, C.G.: Reducing the digital divide among children who received desktop or hybrid computers for the home. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res. 15, 233–251 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zilka, C.G.: Do online friendships contribute to the social development of children and teenagers? The bright side of the picture. IJHSS 6(8), 102–112 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zilka, C.G.: Awareness of ICT capabilities, digital literacy, and use of reflective processes in children who received their first home computer. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 9(1), 80–98 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding/grant for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gila Cohen Zilka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no competing interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study, and parental consent to children under the age of 18.

Ethical approval

The Ethics Committee of the Achva Academic College approved the research and the research tools.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zilka, G.C. Аlways with them: smartphone use by children, adolescents, and young adults—characteristics, habits of use, sharing, and satisfaction of needs. Univ Access Inf Soc 19, 145–155 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0635-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0635-3

Keywords

Navigation