Abstract
Background
The purpose of this paper is to map the number of concerns on the dimensions in Head and Neck Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) on to the health utility (HU) index scores on Euroqol-Five Dimensions-Five levels {EQ-5D-5L) .
Methods
This is a cross-sectional survey conducted in patients who have completed their treatment. Four candidate models were considered, three based on ordinary least squares regression (OLS) and one two-parts model.
Results
A reduced OLS model based on ‘Physical and functional’, ‘Treatment-related’, and ‘Psychological, emotional and spiritual well-being’ domains was found best on the estimation sample. This was validated externally on a separate sample.
Conclusions
This is the first study that mapped a non-QOL tool to generate HU scores on EQ-5D-5L. The proposed mapping algorithm can estimate the cost–utility in economic evaluation studies when HU scores are not directly available. The algorithm will be best suited for studies in low-middle income countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Muzaffar, J., Bari, S., Kirtane, K., Chung, C.H.: Recent advances and future directions in clinical management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 13, 338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13020338
Dandekar, M., Tuljapurkar, V., Dhar, H., Panwar, A., DCruz, A.K.: Head and neck cancers in India. J. Surg. Oncol. 115, 555–563 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24545
Tuljapurkar, V., Dhar, H., Mishra, A., Chakraborti, S., Chaturvedi, P., Pai, P.S.: The Indian scenario of head and neck oncology—challenging the dogmas. South Asian J. Cancer 5, 105–110 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-330X.187573
Caulley, L., Rodin, D., Kilty, S., Randolph, G., Hunink, M.G., Shin, J.J.: Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology part 10: cost-effectiveness analyses in otolaryngology. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 161, 375–387 (2019)
Caulley, L., Hunink, M.G., Kilty, S., et al.: Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology part 9: valuing health outcomes. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 160, 11–21 (2019)
Brazier, J.E., Yang, Y., Tsuchiya, A., Rowen, D.L.: A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. Eur. J. Health Econ. 11, 215–225 (2010)
Rogers, S.N., El-Sheikha, J., Lowe, D.: The development of a Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) to help reveal patients concerns in the head and neck clinic. Oral Oncol. 45, 555–561 (2009)
Rogers, S.N., Allmark, C., Bekiroglu, F., et al.: Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: main results of a cluster preference randomised controlled trial. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 278, 1–15 (2020)
Rogers, S.N., Lowe, D., Yueh, B., Weymuller, E.A.: The physical function and social-emotional function subscales of the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire (UW-QOL). Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 136, 352–357 (2010)
Petrou, S., Rivero-Arias, O., Dakin, H., et al.: Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: the MAPS statement. J. Med. Econ. 18, 851–857 (2015)
Rogers, S.N., Alvear, A., Anesi, A., et al.: Variations in concerns reported on the patient concerns inventory in patients with head and neck cancer from different health settings across the world. Head Neck 42, 498–512 (2020)
van Hout, B., Janssen, M.F., Feng, Y.S., et al.: Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health 15, 708–715 (2012)
Prinja, S., Downey, L.E., Gauba, V.K., et al.: Health technology assessment for policy making in India: current scenario and way forward. Pharmacoecon. Open 2, 1–3 (2018)
Department of Health Research: Health technology assessment in India: process manual. Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi (2018)
Wailoo, A.J., Hernandez-Alava, M., Manca, A., et al.: Mapping to estimate health-state utility from non–preference-based outcome measures: an ISPOR good practices for outcomes research task force report. Value Health 20, 18–27 (2017)
Acaster, S., Pinder, B., Mukuria, C., Copans, A.: Mapping the EQ-5D index from the cystic fibrosis questionnaire-revised using multiple modelling approaches. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 13, 33 (2015)
Cohen, J.: Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, pp. 531–542. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1988)
Miller, N., Rogers, S.N.: A review of question prompt lists used in the oncology setting with comparison to the patient concerns inventory. Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12489
Shunmugasundaram, C., Rutherford, C., Butow, P.N., Sundaresan, P., Dhillon, H.M.: Content comparison of unmet needs self- report measures used in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Psychooncology 28, 2295–2306 (2019)
Stephens, R.F., Noel, C.W., Su, J.S., et al.: Mapping the University of Washington Quality of life questionnaire onto EQ-5D and HUI-3 indices in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 42, 513–521 (2020)
Noel, C.W., Stephens, R.F., Su, J.S., et al.: Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35, onto EQ-5D-5L and HUI-3 indices in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 42, 2277–2286 (2020)
Rogers, S., Miller, R., Ali, K., Minhas, A., Williams, H., Lowe, D.: Patients’ perceived health status following primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 35, 913–919 (2006)
Chan, K.K., Willan, A.R., Gupta, M., Pullenayegum, E.: Underestimation of uncertainties in health utilities derived from mapping algorithms involving health-related quality-of-life measures: statistical explanations and potential remedies. Med. Decis. Making 34, 863–872 (2014)
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical approval
The study got approval from the institutional review board, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was taken from the patients.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thankappan, K., Patel, T., Ajithkumar, K.K. et al. Mapping of head and neck cancer patient concerns inventory scores on to Euroqol-Five Dimensions-Five Levels (EQ-5D-5L) health utility scores. Eur J Health Econ 23, 225–235 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01369-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01369-y
Keywords
- Cost–utility analysis
- Health technology assessment
- Patient Concerns Inventory
- EQ-5D-5L
- Mapping studies
- Health Economics