Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring health outcomes of adolescents: report from a pilot study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a need to understand the practicality, validity and reliability of using utility measures with children and adolescents. We designed a pilot study in order to help guide the selection of an appropriate health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) questionnaire for adolescents to be used in the context of a large randomised controlled trial (RCT) of family therapy versus standard treatment for adolescents aged 11–17 years. The pilot study was carried out on a school sample of adolescents in the same age range as the RCT. Adolescents were asked to fill in three HRQoL questionnaires: the standard EQ-5D, the licensed Health Utilities Index HUI, and the child-friendly version of the standard EQ-5D: the EQ-5D for youth (EQ-5D-Y). This report explores the problems with the language and concepts embodied within those HRQoL questionnaires and open discussion regarding how we can value the health of adolescents for cost-utility analysis in a larger study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drummond, M., Stoddart, G.L., Torrance, G.W.: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programs. Oxford University Press edn, Oxford, United Kingdom (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eidt-Koch, D., Mittendorf, T., Greiner, W.: Cross-sectional validity of the EQ-5D-Y as a generic health outcome instrument in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis in Germany. BMC Pediatr. 28(9), 55 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feeny, D.H.: The Health Utilities Index: a tool for assessing health benefits. Patient Rep. Outcomes Newsl. 34(no. Spring), 2–6 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feeny, D.H., Torrance, G.W., Furlong, W.J.: Health utilities index. In: Spilker, B. (ed.) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, pp. 239–252. Lippincott-Raven Press edn, Philadelphia (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guyatt, G.H., Juniper, E.F., Griffith, L.E., Feeny, D.H., Ferrie, P.J.: Children and adult perceptions of childhood asthma. Pediatrics 99(2), 165–168 (1997)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hennessy, S., Kind, P.: Measuring health status in children: developing and testing a child-friendly version of EQ-5D. In: Proceedings of the 19th plenary meeting of the EuroQol Group, York, pp. 291–310 (2002)

  7. Jelsma, J.: A comparison of the performance of the EQ-5D and the EQ-5D-Y health-related quality of life instruments in South African children. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 33(2), 172–177 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jelsma, J., Ramma, L.: How do children at special schools and their parents perceive their HRQoL compared to children at open schools? Health Qual. Life Outcomes 8(72), 1–7 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lamers, L.M., Bouwmans, C.A.M., van Straten, A., Donker, M.C.H., Hakkaart, L.: Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in mental health patients. Health Econ. 15, 1229–1236 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McDonough, C.M., Grove, M.R., Tosteson, T.D., Lurie, J.D., Hilibrand, A.S., Tosteson, A.N.A.: Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-36-derived societal health state values among Spine Patient outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) participants. Qual. Life Res. 14, 1321–1332 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. NICE edn, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oostenbrink, R., Moll, H.A., Essink-Bot, M.-L.: The EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index for permanent sequelae after meningitis: a head-to-head comparison. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 55, 791–799 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pickard, S., Knight, S.J.: Proxy evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life. Med. Care 43(5), 493–499 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., Wille, N., Wetzel, R., Nickel, J., Bullinger, M.: Generic health-related quality of life assessment in children and adolescents—methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics 24(12), 1199–1220 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ravens-Sieberer, U., Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burström, K., Cavrini, G., Devlin, N., Egmar, A.-C., Gusi, N., Herdman, M., Jelsma, J., Kind, P., Olivares, P.R., Scalone, L., Greiner, W.: Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study. Qual. Life Res. 19, 887–897 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rebok, G., Riley, A., Forrest, C.B., Starfield, B., Green, B., Robertson, J., Tambor, E.: Elementary school-aged children’s reports of their health: a cognitive interviewing study. Qual. Life Res. 10, 59–70 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tarride, J.-E., Burke, N., Bishof, M., Hopkins, R.B., Goeree, L., Campbell, K., Xie, F., O’Reilly, D., & Goeree, R.: A review of health utilities across conditions common in paediatric and adult populations. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 8(12), 1–11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. The EuroQol Group: EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3), 199–208 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ungar, W.J.: Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: are QALYs contraindicated. Pharmacoeconomics 29(8), 641–652 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burström, K., Cavrini, G., Devlin, N., Egmar, A.-C., Greiner, W., Gusi, N., Herdman, M., Jelsma, J., Kind, P., Scalone, L., Ravens-Sieberer, U.: Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Qual. Life Res 19(6), 875–886 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, X., Ohinmaa, A., Veugelers, P.: Sociodemographic and neighbourhood determinants of health-related quality of life among grade-five students in Canada. Qual. Life Res. 19(7), 969–976 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to two anonymous referees, to Ling-Hsiang Chuang, Richard Edlin, and David Meads for comments on a previous version of this paper. We thank Bill Furlong, Wolfgang Greiner, Paul Kind, and Victor Zarate for their help in the design of the pilot study. The SHIFT steering committee members are Prof David Cottrell, Ms Paula Boston, Dr Ivan Eisler, Dr Sarah Fortune, Professor Jonathan Green, Professor Allan House, Dr David Owens, Dr Mima Simic, Mrs Michelle Collinson, Ms Amanda Farrin, Ms Liz Graham, Dr Jane Nixon, Prof Christopher McCabe, Ms Yemi Oluboyede, and Dr Sandy Tubeuf. This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme (project number 07/33/01) and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment. See the HTA programme website for further project information. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandy Tubeuf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oluboyede, Y., Tubeuf, S. & McCabe, C. Measuring health outcomes of adolescents: report from a pilot study. Eur J Health Econ 14, 11–19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0340-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0340-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation