Skip to main content
Log in

Precise evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy using the visual analogue scale: a quantitative and comparative analysis of neuropathy occurring with paclitaxel–carboplatin and docetaxel–carboplatin therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Some regimens of chemotherapy cause peripheral neuropathy such as pain in muscles and joints and numbness in the limbs. It is often difficult to estimate the neuropathy accurately and analyze it in detail. The aim of this study was to investigate whether chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy could be appropriately estimated by using the visual analogue scale (VAS).

Methods

Ninety-three patients who received paclitaxel and carboplatin treatment (TC) or paclitaxel and docetaxel treatment (DC) participated in answering a questionnaire about peripheral neuropathy using the VAS. As a result, 134 cycles of TC and 79 cycles of DC were evaluated. The average of VAS scores at every 10 days after each cycle of chemotherapy began was calculated. The daily change in VAS scores was also analyzed, and average VAS scores compared between TC and DC.

Results

Daily changes in peripheral neuropathy for each treatment could be demonstrated in detail. Pain and numbness had separate patterns of appearance. For both pain and numbness, a greater VAS score was observed in patients receiving TC than in those receiving DC. As the number of cycles grew, peripheral neuropathy became more serious in TC.

Conclusions

The VAS could appropriately recognize the difference in peripheral neuropathy between TC and DC. Moreover, the VAS could also catch the change in peripheral neuropathy. This result suggests that the VAS system is a useful tool for managing peripheral neuropathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozols RF, Bundy BN, Greer BE et al (2003) Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 21:3194–3200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sit AS, Kelley JL, Gallion HH et al (2004) Paclitaxel and carboplatin for recurrent or persistent cancer of the cervix. Cancer Invest 22:368–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Akram T, Maseelall P, Fanning J (2005) Carboplatin and paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1365–1367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasey PA, Jayson GC, Gordon A et al (2004) Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel-carboplatin versus paclitaxel-carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1682–1691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pignata S, De Placido S, Biamonte R et al (2006) Residual neurotoxicity in ovarian cancer patients in clinical remission after first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel: the Multicenter Italian Trial in Ovarian cancer (MITO-4) retrospective study. BMC Cancer 6:5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 2:1127–1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones SE, Erban J, Overmoyer B et al (2005) Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:5542–5551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cavaletti G, Bogliun G, Marzorati L et al (2004) Early predictors of peripheral neurotoxicity in cisplatin and paclitaxel combination chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 15:1439–1442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Postma TJ, Heimans JJ (2000) Grading of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Ann Oncol 11:509–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Postma TJ, Aaronson NK, Heimans JJ et al (2005) The development of an EORTC quality of life questionnaire to assess chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: the QLQ-CIPN20. Eur J Cancer 41:1135–1139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuroi K, Shimozuma K, Ohashi Y et al (2009) Prospective assessment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy due to weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer (CSP-HOR 02 study). Support Care Cancer 17: 1071-1080

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shimozuma K, Ohashi Y, Takeuchi A et al (2009) Feasibility and validity of the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire during taxane chemotherapy in a phase III randomized trial in patients with breast cancer: N-SAS BC 02. Support Care Cancer 17: 1483-1491

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, Girling DJ et al (1997) Randomized trials with quality of life endpoints: are doctors’ ratings of patients’ physical symptoms interchangeable with patients’ self-ratings? Qual Life Res 6:225–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Calhoun EA, Welshman EE, Chang CH et al (2003) Psychometric evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (Fact/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire for patients receiving systemic chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 13:741–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang HQ, Brady MF, Cella D et al (2007) Validation and reduction of FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale for platinum/paclitaxel-induced neurologic symptoms: a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:387–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hausheer FH, Schilsky RL, Bain S et al (2006) Diagnosis, management, and evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Semin Oncol 33:15–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Woodforde JM, Merskey H (1972) Some relationships between subjective measures of pain. J Psychosom Res 16:173–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith TJ, Staats PS, Deer T et al (2002) Randomized clinical trial of an implantable drug delivery system compared with comprehensive medical management for refractory cancer pain: impact on pain, drug-related toxicity, and survival. J Clin Oncol 20:4040–4049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Creticos PS, Schroeder JT, Hamilton RG et al (2006) Immunotherapy with a ragweed-toll-like receptor 9 agonist vaccine for allergic rhinitis. N Engl J Med 355:1445–1455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilron I, Bailey JM, Tu D et al (2005) Morphine, gabapentin, or their combination for neuropathic pain. N Engl J Med 352:1324–1334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuji Takemoto.

About this article

Cite this article

Takemoto, S., Ushijima, K., Honda, K. et al. Precise evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy using the visual analogue scale: a quantitative and comparative analysis of neuropathy occurring with paclitaxel–carboplatin and docetaxel–carboplatin therapy. Int J Clin Oncol 17, 367–372 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0303-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0303-6

Keywords

Navigation