Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A systematic review of Fusobacterium necrophorum-positive acute tonsillitis: prevalence, methods of detection, patient characteristics, and the usefulness of the Centor score

  • Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review the current evidence for an association between Fusobacterium necrophorum (FN) and acute tonsillitis (AT), to assess the prevalence of FN in AT, to identify the better FN detection method, and to characterize the clinical characteristics of FN-positive patients with uncomplicated AT. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and SweMed+ databases for studies reporting on the recovery rates of FN in patients with AT. A total of 498 unique records were identified. Eleven studies were included in a qualitative synthesis and six studies were included in a meta-analysis. Considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 60 %) and risk of bias and confounders was found among the studies, though a subset of studies (prospective) had lower heterogeneity and higher study quality. FN was recovered significantly more frequently from patients (21.2 %) compared to healthy controls (7.6 %) (p < 0.001). FN recovery rates were similar between culture-based studies (20.3 %) and studies using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodology (22.2 %) (p = 0.462). The typical FN-positive AT patient was a smoking young (15–25 years) male presenting with tonsillar exudates and a Centor score of 2 or higher. A clear association between FN and AT was found. FN is likely to be a significant and prevalent pathogen in AT, especially in teenagers and young adults. However, no evidence for causality between FN and AT has been established and it is unexplored if timely antibiotic therapy directed against FN accelerates the resolution of symptoms and decreases the risk of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ESCMID Sore Throat Guideline Group, Pelucchi C, Grigoryan L, Galeone C, Esposito S, Huovinen P, Little P, Verheij T (2012) Guideline for the management of acute sore throat. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:1–28. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03766.x

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hedin K, Bieber L, Lindh M, Sundqvist M (2015) The aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in adolescents and adults - Fusobacterium necrophorum is commonly found. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:263.e1–263.e7. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2014.08.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shulman ST, Tanz RR (2010) Group A streptococcal pharyngitis and immune-mediated complications: from diagnosis to management. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 8:137–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Centor RM, Witherspoon JM, Dalton HP, Brody CE, Link K (1981) The diagnosis of strep throat in adults in the emergency room. Med Decis Making 1:239–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tan ZL, Nagaraja TG, Chengappa MM (1996) Fusobacterium necrophorum infections: virulence factors, pathogenic mechanism and control measures. Vet Res Commun 20:113–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagelskjaer Kristensen L, Prag J (2008) Lemierre’s syndrome and other disseminated Fusobacterium necrophorum infections in Denmark: a prospective epidemiological and clinical survey. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 27:779–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehlers Klug T, Rusan M, Fuursted K, Ovesen T (2009) Fusobacterium necrophorum: most prevalent pathogen in peritonsillar abscess in Denmark. Clin Infect Dis 49:1467–1472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klug TE, Henriksen JJ, Fuursted K, Ovesen T (2011) Significant pathogens in peritonsillar abscesses. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 30:619–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klug TE, Henriksen JJ, Rusan M, Fuursted K, Krogfelt KA, Ovesen T, Struve C (2014) Antibody development to Fusobacterium necrophorum in patients with peritonsillar abscess. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33:1733–1739. doi:10.1007/s10096-014-2130-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (2014) Critical appraisal: notes and checklists. Available online at: http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/checklists.html

  11. Aliyu SH, Marriott RK, Curran MD, Parmar S, Bentley N, Brown NM, Brazier JS, Ludlam H (2004) Real-time PCR investigation into the importance of Fusobacterium necrophorum as a cause of acute pharyngitis in general practice. J Med Microbiol 53:1029–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen A, Hagelskjaer Kristensen L, Prag J (2007) Detection of Fusobacterium necrophorum subsp. funduliforme in tonsillitis in young adults by real-time PCR. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:695–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen A, Hansen TM, Bank S, Kristensen LH, Prag J (2015) Fusobacterium necrophorum tonsillitis: an important cause of tonsillitis in adolescents and young adults. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:266.e1–266.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2014.09.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Centor RM, Atkinson TP, Ratliff AE, Xiao L, Crabb DM, Estrada CA, Faircloth MB, Oestreich L, Hatchett J, Khalife W, Waites KB (2015) The clinical presentation of Fusobacterium-positive and streptococcal-positive pharyngitis in a university health clinic: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med 162:241–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kjærulff AM, Thomsen MK, Ovesen T, Klug TE (2015) Clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients with Fusobacterium necrophorum-positive acute tonsillitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:1457–1463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Batty A, Wren MW (2005) Prevalence of Fusobacterium necrophorum and other upper respiratory tract pathogens isolated from throat swabs. Br J Biomed Sci 62:66–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Amess JA, O’Neill W, Giollariabhaigh CN, Dytrych JK (2007) A six-month audit of the isolation of Fusobacterium necrophorum from patients with sore throat in a district general hospital. Br J Biomed Sci 64:63–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Price SL, Hardy S, Gale P, Basten GP (2011) Prevalence of Fusobacterium necrophorum in persistent sore throat samples. Br J Biomed Sci 68:209–210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eaton C, Swindells J (2014) The significance and epidemiology of Fusobacterium necrophorum in sore throats. J Infect 69:194–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ludlam H, Howard J, Kingston B, Donachie L, Foulkes J, Guha S, Curran MD (2009) Epidemiology of pharyngeal carriage of Fusobacterium necrophorum. J Med Microbiol 58:1264–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klug TE (2014) Incidence and microbiology of peritonsillar abscess: the influence of season, age, and gender. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33:1163–1167. doi:10.1007/s10096-014-2052-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klug TE, Rusan M, Clemmensen KK, Fuursted K, Ovesen T (2013) Smoking promotes peritonsillar abscess. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:3163–3167. doi:10.1007/s00405-013-2474-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fine AM, Nizet V, Mandl KD (2012) Large-scale validation of the Centor and McIsaac scores to predict group a streptococcal pharyngitis. Arch Intern Med 172:847–852

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Klug TE, Rusan M, Fuursted K, Ovesen T (2016) Peritonsillar abscess: complication of acute tonsillitis or Weber’s glands infection? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 155:199–207. doi:10.1177/0194599816639551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brook I (2011) The impact of smoking on oral and nasopharyngeal bacterial flora. J Dent Res 90:704–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kordeluk S, Novack L, Puterman M, Kraus M, Joshua BZ (2011) Relation between peritonsillar infection and acute tonsillitis: myth or reality? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:940–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge statistician Simon Bang Kristensen for the helpful statistical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. E. Klug.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

No financial. Some of the authors of the current review were also co-authors of one of the studies included in the meta-analysis (Kjærulff et al. [15]).

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Appendix

Appendix

PubMed search strategy:

#1 pharyngitis

#2 tonsillitis

#3 sore throat Schema: syn

#4 ((#1) OR #2) OR #3

#5 fusobacterium necrophorum

#6 (#4) AND #5

EMBASE search strategy:

#1 pharyngitis

#2 tonsillitis

#3 sore AND throat

#4 #1 OR #2 OR #3

#5 ‘fusobacterium necrophorum’

#6 #4 AND #5 AND ([article]/lim OR [article in press]/lim)

SweMed+ search strategy:

#1 pharyngitis

#2 tonsillitis

#3 sore throat

#4 #1 OR #2 OR #3

#5 fusobacterium necrophorum

#6 #4 AND #5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klug, T.E., Rusan, M., Fuursted, K. et al. A systematic review of Fusobacterium necrophorum-positive acute tonsillitis: prevalence, methods of detection, patient characteristics, and the usefulness of the Centor score. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35, 1903–1912 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2757-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2757-y

Keywords

Navigation