Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of post-splenectomy patients in the Netherlands

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After splenectomy, patients are at increased risk of sepsis with considerable mortality. The risk of sepsis can be reduced by immunising these patients and by prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis. The purpose of our study was to determine compliance with the international standards for the management of splenectomised patients in the Netherlands by investigating: (i) vaccination rates, (ii) the prescription of antibiotics and (iii) information in discharge letters. A retrospective review of the medical records and discharge correspondence of 609 splenectomy patients from 1997 to 2008 was performed. Data were collected from 28 hospitals. Adherence to vaccination guidelines and the prescription of antibiotics were assessed. It was found that 85.4% of post-splenectomy patients received pneumococcal vaccination, 39.4% received Haemophilus influenzae type B and 32.3% received meningococcal group C vaccination. Also, 12.4% of patients were discharged on prophylactic antibiotics. In less than 25% of cases were adequate recommendations regarding post-splenectomy management given to the general practitioner (GP). In the Netherlands, compliance with recommendations for the management of patients after splenectomy is insufficient. Fifteen percent of patients do not receive vaccination against pneumococci and the majority of patients do not receive antibiotic prophylaxis. The development and implementation of a national guideline for splenectomised patients is urgently required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morris DH, Bullock FD (1919) The importance of the spleen in resistance to infection. Ann Surg 70:513–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mebius RE, Kraal G (2005) Structure and function of the spleen. Nat Rev Immunol 5:606–616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hosea SW, Brown EJ, Hamburger MI et al (1981) Opsonic requirements for intravascular clearance after splenectomy. N Engl J Med 304:245–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Huston JM, Ochani M, Rosas-Ballina M et al (2006) Splenectomy inactivates the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway during lethal endotoxemia and polymicrobial sepsis. J Exp Med 203:1623–1628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deodhar M, Kakkar N (2004) An audit of splenectomies in a teaching hospital in North India. Are postsplenectomy guidelines being complied with? J Clin Pathol 57:407–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Newland A, Provan D, Myint S (2005) Preventing severe infection after splenectomy. BMJ 331:417–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holdsworth RJ, Irving AD, Cuschieri A (1991) Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: actual versus perceived risks. Br J Surg 78:1031–1038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Waghorn DJ (2001) Overwhelming infection in asplenic patients: current best practice preventive measures are not being followed. J Clin Pathol 54:214–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brigden ML, Pattullo A, Brown G (2000) Pneumococcal vaccine administration associated with splenectomy: the need for improved education, documentation, and the use of a practical checklist. Am J Hematol 65:25–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Styrt B (1990) Infection associated with asplenia: risks, mechanisms, and prevention. Am J Med 88:33N–42N

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Singer DB (1973) Postsplenectomy sepsis. Perspect Pediatr Pathol 1:285–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bisharat N, Omari H, Lavi I et al (2001) Risk of infection and death among post-splenectomy patients. J Infect 43:182–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mourtzoukou EG, Pappas G, Peppas G et al (2008) Vaccination of asplenic or hyposplenic adults. Br J Surg 95:273–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. [No authors listed] (1996) Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infection in patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen. Working Party of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology Clinical Haematology Task Force. BMJ 312:430–434

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davies JM, Barnes R, Milligan D (2002) Update of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infection in patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen. Clin Med 2:440–443

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuentes-Ferrer ME, Cano-Escudero S, Mato-Chaín G et al (2008) Vaccination coverage against Streptococcus pneumoniae in splenectomized patients in a fourth-level hospital (1999–2004). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 26:194–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasse B, Moll C, Oehy K et al (2005) Anti-infectious prophylaxis after splenectomy: current practice in an eastern region of Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 135:291–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kyaw MH, Holmes EM, Chalmers J et al (2002) A survey of vaccine coverage and antibiotic prophylaxis in splenectomised patients in Scotland. J Clin Pathol 55:472–474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Donnell J, McGreal G, Daly P et al (2004) Management of patients undergoing splenectomy in an Irish teaching hospital: impact of guidelines. Ir J Med Sci 173:136–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pickering J, Campbell H (2000) An audit of the vaccination and antibiotic prophylaxis practices amongst patients splenectomised in Lothian. Health Bull (Edinb) 58:390–395

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramachandra J, Bond A, Ranaboldo C et al (2003) An audit of post-splenectomy prophylaxis—are we following the guidelines? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:252–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Musher DM, Ceasar H, Kojic EM et al (2005) Administration of protein-conjugate pneumococcal vaccine to patients who have invasive disease after splenectomy despite their having received 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. J Infect Dis 191:1063–1067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cherif H, Landgren O, Konradsen HB et al (2006) Poor antibody response to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination suggests increased susceptibility to pneumococcal infection in splenectomized patients with hematological diseases. Vaccine 24:75–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by ZonMw.

We would like to thank all of the participating hospitals for their cooperation.

Conflict of interests

There are no potential conflicts of interest for any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. J. Lammers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lammers, A.J.J., Veninga, D., Lombarts, M.J.M.H. et al. Management of post-splenectomy patients in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29, 399–405 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0870-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0870-x

Keywords

Navigation