Skip to main content
Log in

Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report experiments based on a novel test in domestic chicks (Gallus gallus), designed to examine the encoding of two different geometric features of an enclosed environment: relative lengths of the walls and amplitude of the corners. Chicks were trained to search for a food reward located in one corner of a parallelogram-shaped enclosure. Between trials, chicks were passively disoriented and the enclosure was rotated, making reorientation possible only on the basis of the internal spatial structure of the enclosure. In order to reorient, chicks could rely on two sources of information: the relative lengths of the walls of the enclosure (associated to their left-right sense order) and the angles subtended by walls at corners. Chicks learned the task choosing equally often the reinforced corner and its rotational equivalent. Results of tests carried out in novel enclosures, the shapes of which were chosen ad hoc (1) to induce reorientation based only on the ratio of walls lengths plus sense (rectangular enclosure), or (2) to induce reorientation based only on corner angles (rhombus-shaped enclosure), suggested that chicks encoded both features of the environment. In a third test, in which chicks faced a conflict between these geometric features (mirror parallelogram-shaped enclosure), reorientation seemed to depend on the salience of corner angles. These results shed light on the elements of the environmental geometry which control spatial reorientation, and broaden the knowledge on the geometric representation of space in animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cheng K (1986) A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition 23:149–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K (1987) Rats use the geometry of surfaces for navigation. In: Ellen P, Thinus-Blanc C (eds) Cognitive processes and spatial orientation in animals and man. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 153–159

  • Cheng K, Spetch ML (1998) Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. In: Healy S (ed) Spatial representation in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–17

  • Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Gouteux S, Thinus-Blanc C, Vauclair J (2001) Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. J Exp Psychol Gen 130:505–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermer L, Spelke ES (1994) A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature 370:57–59

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermer-Vasquez L, Spelke E, Katsnelson A (1999) Source of flexibility in human cognition: dual-task studies of space and language. Cogn Psychol 39:3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DM, Spetch ML (2001) Pigeons encode relative geometry. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 27:417–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DM, Spetch ML, Heth DC (1998) Pigeons' (Columbia livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of the environment. J Comp Psychol 112:259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Learmonth AE, Nadel L, Newcombe NS (2002) Children's use of landmarks: implications for modularity theory. Psychol Sci 13:337–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margules J, Gallistel CR (1988) Heading in the rat: determination by environmental shape. Anim Learn Behav 16:404–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovrano AV, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2002) Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish. Cognition 85:B51–B59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sovrano AV, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2003) Modularity as a fish views it: conjoining geometric and non-geometric information for spatial reorientation. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 29:199–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi L, Vallortigara G (2000) Searching for the centre: Spatial cognition in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 26:477–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi L, Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M (1997) Young chickens learn to localize the centre of a spatial environment. J Comp Physiol A 180:567–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi L, Andrew RJ, Vallortigara G (2000) Eye use in search is determined by the nature of task in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). Behav Brain Res 112:119–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M, Compostella S (1990a) Perceptual organization in animal learning: cues or objects? Ethology 85:89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M, Pasti G (1990b) Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). J Comp Psychol 104:248–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Tommasi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tommasi, L., Polli, C. Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). Anim Cogn 7, 53–59 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0182-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0182-y

Key words

Navigation