Skip to main content
Log in

Patients with well-established ankylosing spondylitis show limited deterioration in a ten-year prospective cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to describe the deterioration of well-established ankylosing spondylitis (AS) over a 10-year period. Patients with well-established AS under secondary care review were assessed at baseline and re-assessed after a 10-year period. Data on patient characteristics, spinal mobility and self-reported health status (AS Quality of Life, Bath AS Disease Activity Index, EuroQoL, Revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire and Short Form-12) were compared between the two time points. One hundred fifty-nine patients took part in the initial assessment. After 10 years, 69/117 patients still under secondary care follow-up attended a second assessment. At the second assessment, this cohort was predominately male (92.8 %), mean age of 48.7 years (SD 9.7) and mean disease and symptom duration of 14.9 (SD 9.0) and 21.9 years (SD 13.3), respectively. Amongst the physical and patient-reported measures, only tragus to wall (p < 0.001), cervical rotation (p = 0.001) and disability (p = 0.02) had significantly deteriorated over time. The percentage of patients who had withdrawn from the workforce before normal retirement age increased from 37 to 53 % over the 10-year period. Many of the measures used in the assessment of AS do not generally deteriorate over time in those with well-established disease. This suggests that deterioration may plateau in established disease. However, AS has a long-term social impact with levels of employment in this cohort 30 % lower than the general population. Interventions directed at preventing deterioration may be more effective earlier in their disease course, before this plateau is reached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russell AS. Ankylosing spondylitis—history. Chapter 14 In: Klippel JH, Dieppe PA. (Eds). Rheumatology. Second Edition. Mosby, London.1998; 1: 14.1-2

  2. Boonen A, van der Heijde D (2004) Epidemiology and socioeconomic impact. In: Dougados M, van der Heijde D (eds) Ankylosing spondylitis. Health Press Limited, Oxford, pp 24–31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sieper J, Braun J, Rudwaleit M, Boonen A, Zink A (2002) Ankylosing spondylitis: an overview. Ann Rheum Dis 61(Suppl 3):iii8–iii18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boonen A, van der Linden SM (2002) The burden of ankylosing spondylitis. The Journal of Rheumatology 33:4–11

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ward MM (1998) Quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2:815–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Dziedzic K, Dawes PT (2003) Patient-centred assessment of AS-specific Health-Related Quality of Life: evaluation of the Patient-Generated Index. J Rheumatol 30:764–773

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Verstappen SM, Bijlsma JWJ, Verkleij H, Buskens E, Blaauw AAM, ter Borg EJ, Jacobs JWG (2004) Overview of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients as observed in cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys. Arthritis and Rheumatism 51:488–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boonen A (2006) A review of work-participation, cost-of-illness and cost-effectiveness studies in ankylosing spondylitis. Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology 2:546–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Healey EL, Haywood KL, Jordan KP, Garratt A, Packham JC (2011) Impact of ankylosing spondylitis on work in patients across the United Kingdom. Scand J Rheum 40:34–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. La Plante MP (1991) The demographics of disability. Millbank Quarterly 69:55–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rafia R, Ara R, Haywood KL, Healey EL, Jordan KP, Garratt A, Packham JC. Health care costs alone do not describe the total costs directly attributable to ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology 2010 volume 49: supplement 1

  12. Zhu TY, Tam LS, Lee VW et al (2008) Costs and quality of life of patients with ankylosing spondylitis in Hong Kong. Rheumatology 47:1422–1425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boonen A, de Vet H, van der Heijde D, van der Linden S (2001) Work status and its determinants among patients with ankylosing spondylitis. A systematic literature review. J Rheumatol 28:1056–1062

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organisation (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO. Available from: http://www.int/classification/icf. Accessed 24 Sept 2012

  15. Boonen A, Rasker JJ, Stucki G. The international classification for functioning, disability and health: a challenge and a need for rheumatology. Clin Rheumatol 2007; Jun 9

  16. Boonen A, Landewe R (2005) Health Status in rheumatoid arthritis over 7 years. Ann Rheum Dis 64:173–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Linden SJ, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a proposal for modification of the New York Criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Jordan KP, Dziedzic K, Dawes PT (2004) Spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability, validity and responsiveness. Rheumatology 43:750–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Dziedzic K, Dawes PT (2002) Generic measures of health-related quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability, validity and responsiveness. Rheumatology 41:1380–1387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Haywood KL (2002) M Garratt A, Jordan K, Dziedzic K, Dawes PT. Disease-specific, patient-assessed measures of health outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability, validity and responsiveness. Rheumatology 41:1295–1302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Abbott CA, Helliwell PS, Chamberlain MA (1994) Functional assessment in ankylosing spondylitis: evaluation of a new self-administered questionnaire and correlation with anthropometric variables. Br J Rheumatol 33:1060–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy G, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21:2286–2291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Doward LC, Spoorenberg A, Cook SA et al (2003) Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 62:20–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care 34:220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. The EuroQoL Group (1990) EuroQoL—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gilworth G, Emery P, Barkham N, Smyth MG, Helliwell P, Tennant A (2009) Reducing work disability in ankylosing spondylitis—development of a work instability scale for AS. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 10:68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Carette S, Graham D, Little H, Rubenstein J, Rosen P (1983) The natural course of Ankylosing Spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 26:186–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gran JT, Skomsvoll JF (1997) The outcome of ankylosing spondylitis: a study of 100 patients. British Journal of Rheumatology 36:766–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Braun J, Pincus T (2002) Mortality, course of disease and prognosis of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 20:s16–s22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Office for National Statistics (UK), (2008). First Release: Labour Market Statistics. February 2008. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/lms/labour-market-statistics/february-2008/index.html. Accessed 24 Sept 2012

  31. Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, Kennedy LG, Garrett SL, Calin A (1994) Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index. J Rheumatol 21:1694–1698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H et al (1994) A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. Journal of Rheumatology 21:2281–2285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Jordan KP, Healey EL, Packham JC (2010) Evaluation of Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (EASi-QoL): reliability and validity of a new patient-reported outcome measure. The Journal of Rheumatology 37:2100–2109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the patients who participated in the study and the Rheumatology Department at the Haywood Hospital for allowing us to collect data during routine clinics. This study was funded by an unrestricted educational research grant from Wyeth UK. The content of the article was not influenced in any way by employees of Wyeth.

Disclosure

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. L. Haywood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Healey, E.L., Haywood, K.L., Jordan, K.P. et al. Patients with well-established ankylosing spondylitis show limited deterioration in a ten-year prospective cohort study. Clin Rheumatol 32, 67–72 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-012-2092-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-012-2092-3

Keywords

Navigation