Skip to main content
Log in

The accuracy of ultrasonography in classification of groin hernias according to the criteria of the unified classification system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The modern concept of type-related individualized groin hernia surgery imposes a demand for precise and accurate preoperative determination of the type of groin hernia. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography in classification of groin hernias, according to the criteria of the unified classification system. Unified classification divides groin hernias into nine types (grades): type I (indirect, small), II (indirect, medium), III (indirect, large), IV (direct, small), V (direct, medium), VI (direct, large), VII (combined-pantaloon), VIII (femoral), and O (other).

Patients and methods

One hundred and twenty-five adult patients with clinically diagnosed or suspected groin hernias were examined. Ultrasonography of both groins was performed with a 5 to 10-MHz linear-array transducer. Preoperative ultrasonographic findings of type of groin hernia were compared with the intraoperative findings, which were considered the gold standard.

Results

Total accuracy of ultrasonography in determination of type of groin hernia was 96% (119 of 124 correct predictions of type of groin hernia compared with surgical explorations). All hernias of types I, IV, V, VII, and VIII were correctly identified with ultrasonography (sensitivity and specificity 100%). In the remaining five cases of the 124 (4%), hernia was incorrectly classified with ultrasonography: type VI (direct, large) was misdiagnosed as type III (indirect, large) in three cases, type III as type VI in one case, and type III as type II (indirect, medium) in one case. The sensitivity and the specificity of ultrasonography in classifying type II were 100 and 99%, respectively, for type III, 85 and 97%, and for type VI, 90 and 99%.

Conclusion

Ultrasonography of the groin regions could be used with great accuracy for precise classification of groin hernias in adults. Each type of groin hernia, according to the unified classification system that we used for classification, has a characteristic ultrasonographic presentation, which is demonstrated in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nyhus LM (1993) Individualization of hernia repair; a new era. Surgery 114:1–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nyhus LM (2004) Classification of groin hernia: milestones. Hernia 8:87–88. doi:10.1007/s10029-003-0173-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zollinger RM Jr (1999) A unified classification for inguinal hernias. Hernia 4:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc KA (2003) Anterior open repair of inguinal hernia in adults. In: Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc KA (eds) Management of abdominal hernias, 3rd edn. Arnold, London, pp 167–170

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zollinger RM Jr (2002) Classification of ventral and groin hernias. In: Fitzgibbons RJ, Greenburg AG (eds) Nyhus and Condon’s hernia, 5th edn. Lippincott Willliams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 71–79

    Google Scholar 

  6. van den Berg JC, Strijk SP (1992) Groin hernia: role of herniography. Radiology 184:191–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aquirre DA, Santosa AC, Casola G, Sirlin CB (2005) Abdominal wall hernias: imaging features, complications, and diagnostic pitfalls at Multi-Detector Row CT. RadioGraphics 25:1501–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van den Berg JC, de Valois JC, Go PM, Rosenbusch G (1997) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of groin hernia. Invest Radiol 32:644–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van den Berg JC, de Valois JC, Go PM, Rosenbusch G (1999) Detection of groin hernia with physical examination, ultrasound, and MRI compared with laparoscopic findings. Invest Radiol 34:739–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van den Berg JC (2002) Inguinal hernias: MRI and ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 23:156–173. doi:10.1053/sult.2002.31191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Truong SN, Jansen M (2002) Diagnostic imaging in the evaluation and management of abdominal wall hernia. In: Fitzgibbons RJ, Greenburg AG (eds) Nyhus and Condon’s hernia, 5th edn. Lippincott Willliams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 81–94

    Google Scholar 

  12. Truong S, Pfingsten FP, Dreuw B, Schumpelick V (1993) Value of sonography in diagnosis of uncertain lesions of the abdominal wall and inguinal region. Chirurg 64:468–475

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Korenkov M, Paul A, Troidl H (1999) Color duplex sonography: diagnostic tool in the differentiation of inguinal hernias. J Ultrasound Med 18:565–568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Babkova IV, Bozhko VV (1999) Ultrasound assessment in diagnosis of uncomplicated inguinal hernia. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2:46–50

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang GQ, Sugiyama M, Hagi H, Urata T, Shimamori N, Atomi Y (2001) Groin hernias in adults: value of color Doppler sonography in their classification. J Clin Ultrasound 29:429–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dattola P, Alberti A, Dattola A, Giannetto G, Basile G, Basile M (2002) Inguino-crural hernias: preoperative diagnosis and post-operative follow-up by high-resolution ultrasonography. A personal experience. Ann Ital Chir 73:65–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bradley M, Morgan D, Pentlow B, Roe A (2003) The groin hernia––an ultrasound diagnosis? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:178–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lilly MC, Arregui ME (2002) Ultrasound of the inguinal floor for evaluation of hernias. Surg Endosc 16:659–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kraft BM, Kolb H, Kuckuk B, Haaga S, Leibl BJ, Kraft K, Bittner R (2003) Diagnosis and classification of inguinal hernias: accuracy of clinical, ultrasonographic, and laparoscopic findings. Surg Endosc 17:2021–2024. doi:10.1007/s00464-002-9283-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson P, Hensor E, Lansdown MJ, Ambrose S, Chapman AH (2006) Inguinofemoral hernia: accuracy of sonography in patients with indeterminate clinical features. AJR 187:1168–1178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jamadar DA, Jacobson JA, Morag Y, Girish G, Ebrahim F, Gest T, Franz M (2006) Sonography of inguinal region hernias. AJR 187:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moreno-Egea A, Girela E, Canteras M, Martinez D, Aguayo L (2000) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of inguinal and femoral hernia and its usefulness for indicating laparoscopic surgery. Hernia 4:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shadbolt C, Heinze S, Dietrich R (2001) Imaging of groin masses: inguinal anatomy and pathologic conditions revisited. RadioGraphics 21:261–271

    Google Scholar 

  24. van den Berg JC, de Valois JC, Go PM, Rosenbusch G (2000) Radiological anatomy of the groin region. Eur Radiol 10:661–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Renzulli P, Frei E, Schafer M, Werlen S, Wegmuller H, Krahenbuhl L (1997) Preoperative Nyhus classification of inguinal hernias and type-related individual hernia repair. A case for diagnostic laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:373–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Djuric-Stefanovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Djuric-Stefanovic, A., Saranovic, D., Ivanovic, A. et al. The accuracy of ultrasonography in classification of groin hernias according to the criteria of the unified classification system. Hernia 12, 395–400 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0352-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0352-6

Keywords

Navigation