Abstract
Anxiety is the most common mental health problem in youth. Numerous studies have identified that youth anxiety is associated with interpretation bias or the attribution of threatening meaning to ambiguity. Interpretation bias has been proposed as a mechanism underlying the development and maintenance of pediatric anxiety. Theoretically, interpretation bias should be content-specific to individual youth anxiety symptom domains. However, extant studies have reported conflicting findings of whether interpretation bias is indeed content specific to youth anxiety symptoms or diagnoses. The present meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the literature and answer the question: is the relationship between interpretation bias and anxiety content specific? Search of PubMed and PsycINFO databases from January 1, 1960 through May 28, 2019 yielded 9967 citations, of which 19 studies with 20 comparisons and 2976 participants met eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis with random effects models was conducted to examine an overall effect (Pearson r) between anxiety domain and content-specific interpretation bias in single sample studies, and an overall effect size difference (Cohen’s d) in studies comparing anxious to non-anxious youth. Results support a content specific correlation between interpretation bias and anxiety symptom domain in single sample studies (r = 0.18, p = 0.03). However, it is currently undetermined whether this relationship holds in studies that compare the relationship between content-specific interpretation bias and anxiety in anxious versus non-anxious youth. A variety of methodologic considerations across studies are discussed, with implications for further investigation of interpretation bias and youth anxiety.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Seven studies met inclusion criteria 1 through 4 described above, but did not provide sufficient data to calculate effect sizes and were therefore excluded: [25,26,27,28,29,30,31]
Two studies met inclusion criteria 1 through 4 described above but examined bias in other disorder group samples and were therefore excluded: [32, 33]
Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software converts the correlation coefficient to the Fisher’s z scale, with analyses performed using transformed values, with the results converted back to correlations to presentations [37]
References
Beesdo K, Knappe S, Pine DS (2009) Anxiety and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: developmental issues and implications for DSM-V. Psychiatr Clin North Am 32(3):483–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2009.06.002
Merikangas KR, He J, Burstein M, Swanson SA, Avenevoli S, Cui L, Benjet C, Georgiades K, Swendsen J (2010) Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U. S. Adolescents: results from the national comorbidity survey replication–adolescent supplement (Ncs-a). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 49(10):980–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017
Bittner A, Egger HL, Erkanli A, Jane Costello E, Foley DL, Angold A (2007) What do childhood anxiety disorders predict? J Child Psychol Psychiatry 48(12):1174–1183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01812.x
Pine DS, Cohen P, Gurley D, Brook J, Ma Y (1998) The risk for early-adulthood anxiety and depressive disorders in adolescents with anxiety and depressive disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55(1):56. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.55.1.56
Benjamin CL, Harrison JP, Settipani CA, Brodman DM, Kendall PC (2013) Anxiety and related outcomes in young adults 7 to 19 years after receiving treatment for child anxiety. J Consult Clin Psychol 81(5):865–876. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033048
Walkup JT, Albano AM, Piacentini J, Birmaher B, Compton SN, Sherrill JT, Ginsburg GS, Rynn MA, McCracken J, Waslick B, Iyengar S, March JS, Kendall PC (2008) Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. N Engl J Med 359(26):2753–2766. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0804633
Ginsburg GS, Becker EM, Keeton CP, Sakolsky D, Piacentini J, Albano AM, Compton SN, Iyengar S, Sullivan K, Caporino N, Peris T, Birmaher B, Rynn M, March J, Kendall PC (2014) Naturalistic follow-up of youths treated for pediatric anxiety disorders. JAMA Psychiatry 71(3):310–318. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4186
March JS (2011) Looking to the future of research in pediatric anxiety disorders. Depress Anxiety 3:322–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20754
Sherrill JT (2008) Commentary: expanding the research agenda on interventions for child and adolescent anxiety disorders. Cogn Behav Pract 15(2):166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2007.11.002
Daleiden EL, Vasey MW (1997) An information-processing perspective on childhood anxiety. Clin Psychol Rev 17(4):407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00010-X
Field AP, Lester KJ (2010) Is there room for development in developmental models of information processing biases to threat in children and adolescents? Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 13(4):315–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-010-0078-8
Muris P, Field AP (2008) Distorted cognition and pathological anxiety in children and adolescents. Cogn Emot 22(3):395–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701843450
Creswell C, Schniering CA, Rapee RM (2005) Threat interpretation in anxious children and their mothers: comparison with nonclinical children and the effects of treatment. Behav Res Ther 43(10):1375–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.009
Miers AC, Blöte AW, Bögels SM, Westenberg PM (2008) Interpretation bias and social anxiety in adolescents. J Anxiety Disord 22(8):1462–1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.02.010
Amir N, Beard C, Bower E (2005) Interpretation bias and social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy Res 29(4):433–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-2834-5
Rozenman M, Amir N, Weersing VR (2014) Performance-based interpretation bias in clinically anxious youths: relationships with attention, anxiety, and negative cognition. Behav Ther 45(5):594–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.03.009
Rozenman M, Vreeland A, Piacentini J (2017) Thinking anxious, feeling anxious, or both? Cognitive bias moderates the relationship between anxiety disorder status and sympathetic arousal in youth. J Anxiety Disord 45:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.11.004
Waters AM, Wharton TA, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Craske MG (2008) Threat-based cognitive biases in anxious children: comparison with non-anxious children before and after cognitive behavioural treatment. Behav Res Ther 46(3):358–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.01.002
Cristea I, Kok RN, Cuijpers P (2015) The efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions for mental health problems: a meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry 30:850. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(15)30663-5
Hallion LS, Ruscio AM (2011) A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. Psychol Bull 137(6):940–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024355
Gonzalez A, Rozenman M, Langley AK, Kendall PC, Ginsburg GS, Compton S, Walkup JT, Birmaher B, Albano AM, Piacentini J (2017) Social interpretation bias in children and adolescents with anxiety disorders: psychometric examination of the self-report of ambiguous social situations for youth (SASSY) scale. Child Youth Care Forum 46(3):395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9381-y
Stuijfzand S, Creswell C, Field AP, Pearcey S, Dodd H (2018) Research review: Is anxiety associated with negative interpretations of ambiguity in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 59(11):1127–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12822
Hankin BL, Gibb BE, Abela JRZ, Flory K (2010) Selective attention to affective stimuli and clinical depression among youth: role of anxiety and specificity of emotion. J Abnorm Psychol 119(3):491–501. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019609
Crick NR, Dodge KA (1994) A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychol Bull 115(1):74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
Orchard F, Apetroaia A, Clarke K, Creswell C (2017) Cognitive bias modification of interpretation in children with social anxiety disorder. J Anxiety Disord 45:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.012
Perez-Olivas G, Stevenson J, Hadwin JA (2011) The association between elevated maternal panic-like and depression symptoms and separation-related interpretive biases in offspring. J Child Fam Stud 20(2):232–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-010-9408-1
Sportel BE, de Hullu E, de Jong PJ, Nauta MH (2013) Cognitive bias modification versus CBT in reducing adolescent social anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 8(5):e64355. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064355
van Niekerk RE, Klein AM, Allart-van Dam E, Rinck M, Souren PM, Hutschemaekers GJ, Becker ES (2018) Biases in interpretation as a vulnerability factor for children of parents with an anxiety disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 57(7):462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.04.009
Vassilopoulos SP, Blackwell SE, Moberly NJ, Karahaliou E (2012) Comparing imagery and verbal instructions for the experimental modification of interpretation and judgmental bias in children. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 43(1):594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.08.004
Vassilopoulos SP, Brouzos A (2016) Cognitive bias modification of interpretations in children: processing information about ambiguous social events in a duo. J Child Fam Stud 25(1):299–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0194-7
Vassilopoulos SP, Moberly NJ, Lau JY (2015) Cognitive bias modification training in children affects anxiety during anticipatory processing of social evaluation. Int J Cogn Ther 8(4):318–334. https://doi.org/10.1521/ijct.2015.8.4.318
Klein AM, Salemink E, de Hullu E, Houtkamp E, Papa M, van der Molen M (2018) Cognitive bias modification reduces social anxiety symptoms in socially anxious adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities: a randomized controlled trial. J Autism Dev Disord 48(9):3116–3126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3579-9
Houtkamp EO, van der Molen MJ, de Voogd EL, Salemink E, Klein AM (2017) The relation between social anxiety and biased interpretations in adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil 67:94–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.06.003
Loscalzo Y, Giannini M, Miers AC (2018) Social anxiety and interpretation bias: examining clinical and subclinical components in adolescents. Child Adolesc Ment Health 23(3):169–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12221
In-Albon T, Dubi K, Rapee RM, Schneider S (2009) Forced choice reaction time paradigm in children with separation anxiety disorder, social phobia, and nonanxious controls. Behav Res Ther 47(12):1058–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.08.003
Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H (2013) Comprehensive meta-analysis version 3. Biostat, Engelwood
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press, New York
Cohen J (1992) Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1(3):81–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56(2):455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
Mullen B (1989) Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Giannini M, Loscalzo Y (2016) Social anxiety and adolescence: interpretation bias in an Italian Sample. Scand J Psychol 57:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12263
Haller SPW, Raeder SM, Scerif G, Cohen Kadosh K, Lau JYF (2016) Measuring online interpretations and attributions of social situations: links with adolescent social anxiety. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 50:250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.09.009
In-Albon T, Klein A, Rinck M, Becker E, Schneider S (2008) Development and evaluation of a new paradigm for the assessment of anxiety-disorder-specific interpretation bias using picture stimuli. Cogn Emot 22(3):422–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701872293
Klein AM, Titulaer G, Simons C, Allart E, de Gier E, Bögels SM, Becker ES, Rinck M (2014) Biased interpretation and memory in children with varying levels of spider fear. Cogn Emot 28(1):182–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.810144
Klein AM, Bakens R, van Niekerk RE, Ouwens MA, Rapee RM, Bögels SM, Becker ES, Rinck M (2018) The relation between generalized anxiety disorder symptoms and content-specific interpretation biases for auditory stimuli in children. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 61:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.06.011
Klein AM, Flokstra E, van Niekerk R, Klein S, Rapee RM, Hudson JL, Bögels SM, Becker ES, Rinck M (2018) The role of self-reports and behavioral measures of interpretation biases in children with varying levels of anxiety. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 49(6):897–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-018-0804-x
Klein AM, Rapee RM, Hudson JL, Morris TM, Schneider SC, Schniering CA, Becker ES, Rinck M (2019) Content-specific interpretation biases in clinically anxious children. Behav Res Ther 121:103452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103452
Lau JYF, Pettit E, Creswell C (2013) Reducing children’s social anxiety symptoms: exploring a novel parent-administered cognitive bias modification training intervention. Behav Res Ther 51(7):333–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2013.03.008
Lisk SC, Pile V, Haller SPW, Kumari V, Lau JYF (2018) Multisession cognitive bias modification targeting multiple biases in adolescents with elevated social anxiety. Cognit Ther Res 42(5):581–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9912-y
Mobach L, Rinck M, Becker ES, Hudson JL, Klein AM (2019) Content-specific interpretation bias in children with varying levels of anxiety: the role of gender and age. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 50(5):803–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-019-00883-8
Muris P, Kindt M, Bögels S, Merckelbach H, Björn G, Moulaert V (2000) Anxiety and threat perception abnormalities in normal children. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 22:183–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007588524525
Muris P, Luermans J, Merckelbach H, Mayer B (2000) “Danger is lurking everywhere”. The relation between anxiety and threat perception abnormalities in normal children. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 31(2):123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7916(00)00016-1
Muris P, Merckelbach H, Damsma E (2000) Threat perception bias in nonreferred, socially anxious children. J Clin Child Psychol 29(3):348–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP2903_6
Smith-Janik SB, Green JS, Teachman BA (2013) Age differences in information processing biases in spider fear. Int J Cogn Ther 6(4):401–420. https://doi.org/10.1521/ijct.2013.6.4.401
Vassilopoulos SP, Banerjee R (2012) Social anxiety and content specificity of interpretation and judgemental bias in children: specificity of cognitive biases in children. Infant Child Dev 21(3):298–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.746
Yu M, Westenberg PM, Li W, Wang J, Miers AC (2019) Cultural evidence for interpretation bias as a feature of social anxiety in Chinese adolescents. Anxiety, Stress, Coping 32(4):376–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2019.1598556
Van de Mortel TF (2008) Fake it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Aust J Adv Nurs 25(4):40
Ellis PD (2010) The essential guide to effect sizes: statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rosenthal JA (1996) Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. J Soc Serv Res 21(4):37–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(95)00082-8
Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M (2005) Publication bias in meta-analysis: prevention, assessment and adjustments, 1–7
Heeren, Mogoase, Philippot, & McNally (2015) Attention bias modification for social anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 40: 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.06.001
Goh JX, Hall JA, Rosenthal R (2016) Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: some arguments on why and a primer on how: mini meta-analysis. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 10(10):535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
Valentine JC, Pigott TD, Rothstein HR (2010) How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. J Educ Behav Stat 35(2):215–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998609346961
Greco T, Zangrillo A, Biondi-Zoccai G, Landoni G (2013) Meta-analysis: pitfalls and hints. Heart Lung Vessel 5(4):219–225
Grissom RJ, Kim JJ (2012) Effect sizes for research: Univariate and multivariate applications. Routledge, London
Hedges L, Olkin I (2014) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic press, Cambridge
Kraemer H, Gavins A (1982) A nonparametric technique for meta-analysis effect size calculation. Psychol Bull 91(2):404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.404
Rosenthal R (1986) Meta-analytic procedures for social science research. Educ Res J 15(8):18–20
Zakzanis KK (2001) Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth Formulae, illustrative numerical examples, and heuristic interpretation of effect size analyses for neuropsychological researchers. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 16(7):653–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/16.7.653
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data extraction, and analysis were performed by Anni Subar, Kaeli Humphrey, and Michelle Rozenman. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Anni Subar and Michelle Rozenman and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest for the current work. The last author has received funding in the last 3 years from the National Institute of Mental Health (R61MH121552), NIH/NCATS (UL1TR000124), University of Denver Professional Research Opportunities for Faculty, and UCLA Friends of Semel Research Scholar Program to conduct research unrelated to the current work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Subar, A.R., Humphrey, K. & Rozenman, M. Is interpretation bias for threat content specific to youth anxiety symptoms/diagnoses? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 31, 1341–1352 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01740-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01740-7