Skip to main content
Log in

Developmental trajectories of physical aggression: prediction of overt and covert antisocial behaviors from self- and mothers’ reports

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical aggression declines for the majority of children from preschool to elementary school. Although this desistance generally continues during adolescence and early adulthood, a small group of children maintain a high level of physical aggression over time and develop other serious overt and covert antisocial behaviors. Typically, researchers have examined relations of developmental changes in physical aggression to later violence with teachers’ or mothers’ reports on surveys. Little is known about the degree to which children’s self-reported physical aggression predicts later antisocial behavior. The longitudinal study in this article had a staggered, multiple cohort design. Measures of physical aggression were collected through self- and mother reports from age 11–14 years, which were used to construct trajectory groups (attrition was 6 and 14% from age 11–14, respectively, for self- and mother reports). Overt and covert antisocial behaviors were self-reported at age 18–19 years (attrition was 36% from age 11 to 18–19). Four trajectory groups (low stable, 11%; moderate-low declining, 34%; moderate declining, 39%; high stable, 16%) were identified from self-reports, whereas three trajectories (low declining, 33%; moderate declining, 49%; high stable, 18%) were identified from mothers’ ratings. We examined the prediction of overt and covert antisocial behaviors in early adulthood from the high stable and the moderate declining trajectories. According to both informants, higher probability of belonging to the high stable group was associated with higher overt and covert antisocial behavior, whereas higher probability of belonging to the moderate declining group was associated with higher covert antisocial behavior. Our results support the value of children’s as well as mothers’ reports of children’s aggression for predicting different types of serious antisocial behavior in adulthood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Previous psychometric studies on the PVA scale have not explored its multidimensionality but sustained its monolithic dimensionality based on exploratory factor analyses [9, 30]. In order to update these results, confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to examine the factor structure of the PVA scale for self- and mother reports, accounting for the order categorical nature of its items. A two-factor model provided a better fit to the PVA scale for both self- and mother reports: one factor for physical aggression and another one for verbal aggression. Details on these analyses are available from the first author upon request. Only PA was used in this study.

  2. In each model, the initial level of the outcome referred to the unique contribution of the outcome at age 14 years that was not shared with PA at age 14 years. Thus, we obtained residual variables by regressing PA at age 14 years based on self-report onto OAB and CAB at age 14 years (explained variances were, respectively, 38 and 15%).

References

  1. Achenbach TM (1991) Manual for the Youth-Self Report and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry

  2. Achenbach TM, McConaughy SH, Howell CT (1987) Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bullettin 101:213–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brame R, Nagin DS, Tremblay RE (2001) Developmental trajectories of aggression. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52:503–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long SJ (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 136–162

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broidy LM, Nagin DS, Tremblay RE, Bates JE, Brame R, Dodge KA, Fergusson DM, Horwood JL, Loeber R, Laird R, Lynam D, Moffitt TE, Pettit GS, Vitaro F (2003) Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: a six site, cross national study. Dev Psychol 39:222–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cairns RB, Cairns BD, Neckerman H, Ferguson L, Gariepy J (1989) Growth and aggression: 1. Childhood to early adolescence. Dev Psychol 25:320–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Pastorelli C, Bandura A, Zimbardo PG (2000) Prosocial foundations of children’s academic achievement. Psychol Sci 11(4):302–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caprara GV, Mazzotti E, Prezza M (1990) Una scala per la misura dell’atteggiamento verso la violenza [A scale for the measurement of attitude toward violence]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 17:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  9. Caprara GV, Pastorelli C (1993) Early emotional instability, prosocial behavior and aggression: some methodological aspects. Eur J Pers 7:19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Card NA, Stucky BD, Sawalani GM, Little TD (2008) Direct and indirect aggression during chidlhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Dev 79(5):1185–1229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chamberlain P (2003) Treating chronic juvenile offenders: advances made through the Oregon multidimensional treatment foster care model. American Psychological Association, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Côté S, Vaillancourt T, LeBlanc J, Nagin DS, Tremblay RE (2006) The development of physical aggression from toddlerhood to pre-adolescence: A nationwide longitudinal study. J Abnorm Child Psychol 34(1):71–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Los Reyes A, Kazdin AE (2005) Informant Discrepancies in the Assessment of Childhood Psychopathology: A Critical Review, Theoretical Framework, and Recommendations for Further Study. Psychol Bull 131(4):483–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dishion T, Patterson G (2006) The development and ecology of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. Developmental psychopathology, Risk, disorder, and adaptation, Vol 3, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, pp 503–541

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dodge KA (2009) Community intervention and public policy in the prevention of antisocial behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50(1–2):194–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elliott DS, Mihalic S (2004) Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prev Sci 5(1):47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harachi TW, Fleming CB, White HR, Ensminger ME, Abbott RD, Catalano RF, Haggerty KP (2006) Aggressive behavior among girls and boys during middle childhood: predictors and sequelae of trajectory group membership. Aggress Behav 32:279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Henggeler WW, Schoenwald SK, Bourduin CM, Rowland MD, Cunningham PB (1998) Multisystemic treatment of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoeve M, Blokland A, Semon Dubas J, Loeber R, Gerris JRM, van der Laan PH (2008) Trajectories of delinquency and parenting styles. J Abnorm Child Psychol 36(2):223–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Istituto Italiano di Statistica (2002) Annuario statistico italiano 2002 [Italian yearbook of statistics 2002]. ISTAT, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jones B, Nagin DS, Roeder K (2001) A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociol Methods Res 29:374–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ladd GW, Kochenderfer-Ladd B (2002) Analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims. Psychol Assess 14(1):74–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Loeber R, Stouthamer-Loeber M (1998) Development of juvenile aggression and violence. Some common misconceptions and controversies. Am Psychol 53:242–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martino SC, Ellickson PL, Klein DJ, McCaffrey D, Edelen MO (2008) Multiple trajectories of physical aggression among adolescent boys and girls. Aggress Behav 33:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  26. Muthèn LK, Muthèn BO (2006) Mplus users guide. Muthèn and Muthèn, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nagin DS (1999) Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychol Methods 4:139–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nagin DS (2005) Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nagin DS, Tremblay RE (1999) Trajectories of boys’ physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Dev 70:1181–1196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pastorelli C, Barbaranelli C, Cermak I, Rodsza S, Caprara GV (1997) Measuring emotional instability, prosocial behavior and aggression in pre/adolescents: a cross/national study. Pers Indiv Differ 23(4):691–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Plewis I, Vitaro F, Tremblay RE (2006) Modelling repeated ordinal reports from multiple informants. Stat Modelling 6:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Raine A, Dodge K, Loeber R, Gatzke-Kopp L, Lynam D, Reynolds C, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Liu J (2006) The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggress Behav 32:159–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schaeffer CM, Petras H, Ialongo N, Poduska J, Kellam S (2003) Modeling growth in boys’ aggressive behavior across elementary school: links to later criminal involvement, conduct disorder, and antisocial personality disorder. Dev Psychol 39(6):1020–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Scott S, Sylva K, Doolan M, Price J, Jacobs B, Crook C, Landau S (2010) Randomised controlled trial of parent groups for child antisocial behaviour targeting multiple risk factors: the SPOKES project. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 51(1):48–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Steenkamp JEM, Baumgartner H (1998) Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. J Consum Res 25:78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Timmermans M, van Lier PAC, Koot HM (2008) Which forms of child/adolescent externalizing behaviors account for late adolescent risky sexual behavior and substance use? J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49(4):386–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tremblay RE (2000) The development of aggressive behavior during childhood: what we learned in the past century? Int J Behav Dev 24(2):129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tremblay RE (2008) Understanding development and prevention of chronic physical aggression: towards experimental epigenetic studies. Phil Trans R Soc B 363:2613–2622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods 2:4–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Verhulst FC, van der Ende J (1992) Agreement between parents’ reports and adolescents’ self-reports of problem behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 33:1011–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Waaktar T, Borge AIH, Christie HJ, Torgersen S (2005) Youth–parent consistencies on ratings of difficulties and prosocial behavior: exploration of an at-risk sample. Scand J Psychol 46:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by grants from the Spencer Foundation and W. T. Grant Foundation to Albert Bandura, from the Ministero dell’Istruzione dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR) to Gian Vittorio Caprara (COFIN 1998, 2000) and to Eugenia Scabini (COFIN 2000–2002), and from the National Institute of Mental Health to Nancy Eisenberg.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Di Giunta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Giunta, L., Pastorelli, C., Eisenberg, N. et al. Developmental trajectories of physical aggression: prediction of overt and covert antisocial behaviors from self- and mothers’ reports. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19, 873–882 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-010-0134-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-010-0134-4

Keywords

Navigation