Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Isolated development of inner (wall) caries like lesions in a bacterial-based in vitro model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study conducted in a bacterial-based in vitro caries model aimed to determine whether typical inner secondary caries lesions can be detected at cavity walls of restorations with selected gap widths when the development of outer lesions is inhibited. Sixty bovine tooth specimens were randomly assigned to the following groups: test group 50 (TG50; gap, 50 μm), test group 100 (TG100; gap, 100 μm), test group 250 (TG250; gap, 250 μm) and a control group (CG; gap, 250 μm). The outer tooth surface of the test group specimens was covered with an acid-resistant varnish to inhibit the development of an outer caries lesion. After incubation in the caries model, the area of demineralization at the cavity wall was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy. All test group specimens demonstrated only wall lesions. The CG specimens developed outer and wall lesions. The TG250 specimens showed significantly less wall lesion area compared to the CG (p < 0.05). In the test groups, a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) in lesion area could be detected in enamel between TG50 and TG250 and in dentine between TG50 and TG100. In conclusion, the inner wall lesions of secondary caries can develop without the presence of outer lesions and therefore can be regarded as an entity on their own. The extent of independently developed wall lesions increased with gap width in the present setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baume LJ (1962) Special commission on oral and dental statistics: general principles concerning the international standardization of dental caries statistics. Int Dent J 12:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hals E, Andreassen B, Bie T (1974) Histopathology of natural caries around silver amalgam fillings. Caries Res 8:343–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hals E, Nernaes A (1971) Histopathology of in vitro caries developing around silver amalgam fillings. Caries Res 5:58–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fontana M, Dunipace AJ, Gregory RL et al (1996) An in vitro microbial model for studying secondary caries formation. Caries Res 30:112–118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Godoy F, Flaitz CM, Hicks MJ (1998) Secondary caries adjacent to amalgam restorations lined with a fluoridated dentin desensitizer. Am J Dent 11:254–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilmour AS, Edmunds DH, Newcombe RG et al (1993) An in vitro study into the effect of a bacterial artificial caries system on the enamel adjacent to composite and amalgam restorations. Caries Res 27:169–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilmour SM, Edmunds DH, Dummer PM (1990) The production of secondary caries-like lesions on cavity walls and the assessment of microleakage using an in vitro microbial caries system. J Oral Rehabil 17:573–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kidd EAM (1976) Microleakage in relation to amalgam and composite restorations. A laboratory study. Br Dent J 141:305–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lobo MM, Goncalves RB, Ambrosano GMB et al (2005) Chemical or microbiological models of secondary caries development around different dental restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 74:725–731

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas RZ, Ruben JL, ten Bosch JJ et al (2007) Approximal secondary caries lesion progression, a 20-week in situ study. Caries Res 41:399–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Özer L (1997) The relationship between gap size, microbial accumulation and the structural features of natural caries in extracted teeth with class II amalgam restorations. Master thesis, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

  12. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F (2000) Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int 31:165–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jorgensen KD, Wakumoto S (1968) Occlusal amalgam fillings: marginal defects and secondary caries. Odontol Tidskr 76:43–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Derand T, Birkhed D, Edwardsson S (1991) Secondary caries related to various marginal gaps around amalgam restorations in vitro. Swed Dent J 15:133–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Söderholm KJ, Antonson DE, Fischlweiger W (1998) Correlation between marginal discrepancies at the amalgam/tooth interface and recurrent caries. In: Anusavice K (ed) Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Criteria for placement and replacement, 1st edn. Quintessence Publishing, Berlin, pp 95–108

    Google Scholar 

  16. Totiam P, Gonzales-Gabezas C, Fontana MR et al (2007) A new in vitro model to study the relationship of gap size and secondary caries. Caries Res 41:467–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seemann R, Bizhang M, Klück I et al (2005) A novel in vitro microbial-based model for studying caries formation-development and initial testing. Caries Res 39:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seemann R, Klück I, Bizhang M et al (2005) Secondary caries-like lesions at fissure sealings with Xeno III and Delton—an in vitro study. J Dent 33:443–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shellis RP (1978) A synthetic saliva for cultural studies of dental plaque. Arch Oral Biol 23:485–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand Statist 6:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hodges DJ, Mangum FI, Ward MT (1995) Relationship between gap width and recurrent dental caries beneath occlusal margins of amalgam restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 23:200–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kidd EAM, O’Hara JW (1990) The caries status of occlusal amalgam restorations with marginal defects. J Dent Res 69:1275–1277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rezwani-Kaminski T, Kamann W, Gaengler P (2002) Secondary caries susceptibility of teeth with long-term performing composite restorations. J Oral Rehabil 29:1131–1138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kidd EAM, Fejerskov O (2004) What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenic biofilms. J Dent Res 83(Spec No C):C35–C38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Özer L, Thylstrup A (1995) What is known about caries in relation to restorations as a reason for replacement? A review. Adv Dent Res 9:394–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Seemann R (2005) Untersuchungen zur Kariespräventionin einem biofilmbasierten In-vitro-Modell (Habilitationsschrift). Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goldberg J, Tanzer J, Munster E et al (1981) Cross-sectional clinical evaluation of recurrent enamel caries, restoration of marginal integrity, and oral hygiene status. J Am Dent Assoc 102:635–641

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Marion von Zitzewitz and Steffie Balz who helped in the preparation of the specimens, Klaus Dannenberg from the “Medizinisch technische Labore” of the Charité by building the vice-like appliance, Dr. Carsten Grötzinger by helping us to take the CLSM images, Helmut Orawa from the “Institut für Biometrie und klinische Epidemiologie” of the Charité for his assistance in performing the statistical analysis. Special thanks to all of these people.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Seemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diercke, K., Lussi, A., Kersten, T. et al. Isolated development of inner (wall) caries like lesions in a bacterial-based in vitro model. Clin Oral Invest 13, 439–444 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0250-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0250-z

Keywords

Navigation